Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 November 14

November 14 edit

Template:Lo-Fi-Fnk edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:33, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

One album with an article. Doesn't not provide additional navigational benefit. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 21:14, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Metrolink web edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. Template now functions. Documentation of how it works now would be helpful. (non-admin closure) James (talk/contribs) 16:08, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This template is no longer functional due to a change in the linked website. James (talk/contribs) 21:04, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Metrolink still has individual station pages; see e.g. [1] for Tustin station. The template needs to be rewritten; instances will have to updated. Mackensen (talk) 21:08, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • The new links at the website are convoluted; I don't see a way of rewriting the template that is useful to editors. Happy to be proven wrong. James (talk/contribs) 21:30, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep, I updated the code to automatically determine the new URL, and added support for using the new format as well. the automatic transformation doesn't work in some special cases, so we should eventually change the ca. 55 articles to use the new format. Frietjes (talk) 14:23, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Dutch general election, 2003 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:04, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and generally duplicates the table in Dutch general election, 2003#Results Frietjes (talk) 20:26, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:EQS 2016 riders edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:04, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates List of 2016 UCI WorldTeams and riders#Etixx.E2.80.93Quick-Step Frietjes (talk) 20:21, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:EQS 2015 riders edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:04, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates List of 2015 UCI WorldTeams and riders#Etixx.E2.80.93Quick-Step Frietjes (talk) 20:20, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:EUC 2014 riders edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:04, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates list in List of 2014 UCI ProTeams and riders#Team Europcar Frietjes (talk) 20:19, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:EU apportionment per capita January 1 2007 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:04, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and not clear where it would be used Frietjes (talk) 20:17, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:EU directive edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:04, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, directive articles are using template:Infobox EU legislation directly. Frietjes (talk) 20:17, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:EU fprogrammes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:04, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and all the working links redirect to Framework Programmes for Research and Technological Development Frietjes (talk) 20:16, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Early NFL template list edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:04, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and not clear where it would be used Frietjes (talk) 20:15, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:East London Localities edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:04, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, not clear where it would be used since there are already maps in East London Frietjes (talk) 20:14, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Naked Ape edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:31, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing to navigate to. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 19:00, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, navigations nothing. Frietjes (talk) 20:04, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Wow! Absolutely nothing to navigate! Useless! --woodensuperman 11:06, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wan Light edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:31, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No other articles to provide any navigational benefit. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 18:48, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Andrew Ridgeley edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:26, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Both singles redirect to the album. Not enough other links to warrant a navbox. --woodensuperman 15:50, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 18:56, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, connects 3 articles. Frietjes (talk) 20:05, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bal Chandra Poudel sidebar edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:26, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Author created a series of articles on one regional politician (provincial president of his party), which was overkill. Articles have been speedy deleted A10 as they duplicated info from the main article anyway, but the template is now unnecessary as there is no "series of articles" any more. Fram (talk) 15:28, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Nothing to navigate. --woodensuperman 15:32, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete; template has zero transclusions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:33, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Selena Gomez songs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 November 23. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:26, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).