Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 August 26

< August 25	August 27 >

August 26 edit

Template:Ahnentafel-compact7 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:07, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ahnentafel-compact7 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template designed to show 128 ancestors of a specified individual. Violates WP:NOTGENEALOGY. Currently not used. DrKay (talk) 20:06, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete, way too detailed. Frietjes (talk) 17:25, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:New page edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 September 6. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:59, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:New page (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rochdale Manchester Metrolink edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:58, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rochdale Manchester Metrolink (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only one transclusion. Literally only transcludes {{Rochdale Manchester Metrolink line}} and so looks exactly the same except for the different header. I don't think it's necessary. Jc86035 (talk) 15:08, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the nom. Izno (talk) 16:42, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not important for me. AlfaRocket (talk) 10:21, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete seems like a duplication. D4iNa4 (talk) 17:28, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:G13 statistics edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:07, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:G13 statistics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Incomplete, unused template created by now-banned user. Also nominating the associated Module:G13. – Train2104 (t • c) 14:37, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the nom. The form of these statistics is not obvious to me. --Izno (talk) 16:42, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not important to me, irrelevant. AlfaRocket (talk) 10:22, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fact of the Day edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:55, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fact of the Day (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unmaintained. KMF (talk) 04:52, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the nom. --Izno (talk) 16:42, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete . Not important. AlfaRocket (talk) 10:23, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).