Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 September 27

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< September 26 September 28 >

September 27 edit

Template:Samford Bulldogs quarterback navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus, with NPASR if the currently linked pages are deleted. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 00:35, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough links for this navbox. Once enough blue notable links are added I would support recreation. UCO2009bluejay (talk) 00:25, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Two more wikilinks have been added since this nomination was made, which may change opinions.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 23:00, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Courtesy ping for UCO2009bluejay and Corkythehornetfan per my relist comments above. Primefac (talk) 23:06, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment – as long as others are making articles like this (which will more than likely never be expanded and/or even if it is, it'll be 5-10 yrs from now), my opinion won't change... even though it has 3 articles (excluding the one I mentioned), but general standard is 4. Thanks for the courtesy ping, Primefac! Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 23:36, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • weak keep, connects 4 articles. Frietjes (talk) 16:34, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • comment shouldn't that article linked by corky go up for AfD. Look I really like the work Cake does but in this instance unless there are four or five legitimate notable quarterbacks to link I won't withdraw my nomination. I am tired of the WikiProject linking outside articles to AfD proposals and others types of discussions in order to keep the proposed deleted item, but they never add them to the WParticle in question. If it isn't in the article to establish notability it isn't notable.UCO2009bluejay (talk) 14:53, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Various SUN TV timeslot navboxes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 01:22, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NAVBOX and WP:NOTTVGUIDE. Seem to group together TV series that only have timeslot in common. Rob Sinden (talk) 13:25, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:User Extendon edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Test page. WOSlinker (talk) 12:24, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Supposed to be only for the userboxes for User:Extendon. No transclusion found either. NgYShung huh? 09:38, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • speedy delete, clearly an editing test. Frietjes (talk) 22:15, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Barbadian diaspora edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 October 8 (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 01:04, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fs3 mid edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete under WP:CSD#G7. — ξxplicit 01:35, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No useful purpose and probably duplicates and existing template, which I am still searching for JMHamo (talk) 09:28, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fs3 manager edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete under WP:CSD#G7. — ξxplicit 01:35, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No useful purpose and just hard coded text JMHamo (talk) 09:28, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, can't see how we need this. Frietjes (talk) 22:17, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fs3 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete under WP:CSD#G7. — ξxplicit 01:35, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No useful purpose and probably duplicates and existing template, which I am still searching for JMHamo (talk) 09:27, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, can't see how we need this when we have {{fs2}}. Frietjes (talk) 22:17, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fs3 player edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete under WP:CSD#G7. — ξxplicit 01:35, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hard coded text, no useful purpose JMHamo (talk) 09:22, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, can't see how we need this. Frietjes (talk) 22:18, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Captain edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete (also per author request). MER-C 09:28, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Completely pointless template Joseph2302 09:02, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Loan edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete (also per author request). MER-C 09:33, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Completely pointless template Joseph2302 09:02, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete The function of this template can be easily accomplished as plain wikicode without the need for a billion transclusions across Wikipedia. – PeeJay 11:59, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Kante4 (talk) 13:44, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, we don't need it. Frietjes (talk) 22:20, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:18, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Canal 5 (Televisa Network) Baja California edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 01:03, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Again, there's only one place this article is or could be transcluded. Not an aid to navigation. Raymie (t • c) 07:04, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Torreon TV edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 01:03, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Another Mexican TV template with no transclusions because all the stations in town are repeaters of national networks. Raymie (t • c) 07:01, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2016_September_27&oldid=1074237674"