Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 November 9

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< November 8 November 10 >

November 9 edit

Template:Trump edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Oppose (overwhelming opposition) (non-admin closure) User1937 (talk) 13:20, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Trump with Template:Donald_Trump_series.
Maybe split the "Family" section as well, for this template is overly long IMO. The "series" template should replace most of the instances of {{Trump}} if applicable. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 23:45, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose merge, suggest split of navbox – A merge doesn't make much sense, as one template is a navbox and the other is a sidebar. I agree that the navbox should be seriously trimmed, or perhaps split in two navboxes, one focusing on Trump's family and businesses, another one focusing on his political activities and presidency. — JFG talk 00:05, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose merge It makes no sense to merge a series box with a navbox. They serve separate purposes in different locations.   Spartan7W §   00:22, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong oppose, per above. MB298 (talk) 00:24, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose where else on Wikipedia are two unrelated boxes merged like that? One is primary subject, the other is primary, secondary, and tertiary. Semmendinger (talk) 00:46, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - These two boxes are too different. Yoshiman6464 (talk) 01:52, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose: Two templates that serve completely different purposes. pbp 02:30, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong oppose For many of the reasons already given. Calibrador (talk) 03:42, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose – How on Earth do you suggest we go about merging a navbox and an infobox? Plus, they have separate purposes anyway. Dustin (talk) 05:06, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - I cant imagine any graceful way to merge the two templates - either we have one gigantic monstrosity with too much irrelevant information on every page, or a grossly shortened version that does not do justice to the various interests of Donald Trump - neither solution can be described as desirable. BrxBrx(talk)(please reply with { {re|BrxBrx}}) 06:47, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong oppose - Per everyone else. Parsley Man (talk) 08:31, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong oppose - Pretty confident that Donald Trump is not the only example of a person on Wikipedia who has two templates like this. Plus, these templates are exist for two very different purposes. I can't honestly imagine what merging them would look like. Alxeedo TALK 11:28, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - The templates serve different purposes and help to organize the many nav links.- MrX 12:58, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Heads of the Ministries of the Government of India edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 November 18 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:59, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Clans of Ahluwalias edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob13Talk 02:01, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused and provides no navigation Frietjes (talk) 19:04, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. No links, and nearly all the entries in these templates are non-notable. utcursch | talk 20:28, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:World cinema edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 November 17 ~ Rob13Talk 02:02, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2014 Angola FIBA World Championship for Women team roster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge with the article Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:40, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

single-use templates, should be merged with the article. Frietjes (talk) 17:17, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to 2014 FIBA World Championship for Women squads. Kante4 (talk) 17:55, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Germany Squad 1994 FIBA World Championship edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 November 17 ~ Rob13Talk 02:00, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:A Championship venues edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13Talk 01:59, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 15:14, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ALCOTW edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13Talk 01:58, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused and Wikipedia:WikiProject Alabama/ALCOTW has not been active since 2007 Frietjes (talk) 15:11, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AFL clubs map edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 13:58, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 15:10, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The template has been restored at Australian Football League, for some reason it was removed and replaced with the text that was already in the template. Flickerd (talk) 10:55, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AFL stadiums map edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob13Talk 01:57, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 15:10, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AFL Labelled Map edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13Talk 01:57, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 15:09, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:A-League NYL Ladder edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob13Talk 01:55, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 15:01, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Was used for seasonal NYL ladders, but all ladders have been converted to module format, and thus this template is now unused. --SuperJew (talk) 17:20, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:A-League confirmed expansion map edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13Talk 01:56, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 15:00, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:A.S. Augusta edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13Talk 01:55, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 15:00, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Palana edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by RickinBaltimore (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:23, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be duplicate of the article Palana village. Wasn't sure which speedy criteria applied, so decided to TFD. Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:51, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, it appears to be created by mistake by the same author who created the article. I tagged it as a test page. Frietjes (talk) 14:06, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AFCHD Archive header monthly edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 November 17 ~ Rob13Talk 01:54, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Show only to logged in users edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob13Talk 01:52, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This undocumented, unused template does not appear to work: it just applies a visibility-hidden style to any content passed to it, and a "ShowOnlyToLoggedInUsers" class which has no effect. An example of it not working, of the templated word "test" inside quote marks: "{{Show only to logged in users|test}}". McGeddon (talk) 10:08, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PD-ESA-Gallery edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob13Talk 01:51, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused license tag; potentially misleading - not all ESA photos are freely licensed enough (may entail restrictions or other terms) for Wikipedia FASTILY 08:36, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, if it's PD, it should be moved to commons. Frietjes (talk) 16:08, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:More colored flags edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete per WP:CSD#G5 ~Amatulić (talk) 06:55, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As with the other members of Category:Trylie's Flag Templates, this is a jarring Template that visually supersedes the established method of hatnotes and veers into a non-encyclopedic WP:TONE, especially with its title choice. (I would think, of almost universal necessity, that all flags have colors in them and can think of no colorless ones.) The template repeats information that could easily be contained in the WP:MOS parameter of WP:ALSO. (The whole template seems simply redundant and unnecessary.) Shearonink (talk) 05:47, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:More American flags edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete per WP:CSD#G5 ~Amatulić (talk) 06:56, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A jarring Template that visually supersedes the established method of hatnotes and repeats information that could more easily be contained in the WP:MOS parameter of WP:ALSO. (The whole template is simply redundant and unnecessary.) Shearonink (talk) 05:30, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Reina Hispanoamericana edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob13Talk 01:50, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Navigational box no longer needed since all the annual articles were deleted. Richie Campbell (talk) 03:34, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2016_November_9&oldid=1144554813"