Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 June 24

June 24

Template:Hainish Cycle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:29, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

• Template:Hainish Cycle (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I appreciate the intent behind this template, but it appears to be entirely redundant with Template:Ursula K. Le Guin, which is also used in the places that this one is. Delete. Vanamonde93 (talk) 21:42, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

• delete per nom, redundant navigation. Frietjes (talk) 16:51, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
• Delete as redundant, but would redirection be useful, instead? —PC-XT+ 22:16, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cite HOT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. There was some discussion of deleting (or redirecting/merging) the other template, but that can be handled in another nomination if necessary. (non-admin closure) ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:35, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

• Template:Cite HOT (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Duplicates Template:Handbook of Texas — Maile (talk) 20:18, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

• Delete as per nom, does appear to be a duplicate. Vanamonde93 (talk) 05:34, 27 June 2016 (UTC) I appear not to have understand some of the technical subtleties involved the first time. Keep, unless the nominator has another comeback....Vanamonde93 (talk) 16:16, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
• Keep Template:Cite HOT is intended to be used in citations (hence its name). It is a wrapper around Template:Cite encyclopedia in that it captures all relevant info from the Handbook of Texas page citation and passes it to Template:Cite encyclopedia including common parameters. Template:Handbook of Texas does not do this and does not meet WP:cite standards. Template:Cite Template:Handbook of Texas seems to be only useful in the "External Links" section (although Template:Cite HOT could also fill this role). Darrend1967 (talk) 15:09, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
• Keep as citation, but nominate the other for redirection, merge or deletion, because they do appear redundant —PC-XT+ 22:21, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Link entity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to July 7. Primefac (talk) 02:43, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

• Template:Link entity (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

only used in one article, should be substituted and deleted. due to the complexity, this system should be rewritten in lua if we need it. Frietjes (talk) 18:36, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Table row Dutch town

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 04:08, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

• Template:Table row Dutch town (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Link Dutch town (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Province Dutch municipality (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

only used in one article, should be substituted and deleted. due to the complexity, this system should be rewritten in lua if we need it. Frietjes (talk) 18:36, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

• Delete: hardly any easier to use than an ordinary sortable table. - HyperGaruda (talk) 08:37, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Table row Dutch municipality with province

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete as unopposed. WP:REFUND applies. (non-admin closure) ~ Rob^Talk 18:45, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

• Template:Table row Dutch municipality with province (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Table row Dutch municipality by code (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused in article space. due to the complexity, this system should be rewritten in lua if we need it. Frietjes (talk) 18:32, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Multicol

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted here. (non-admin closure) ~ Rob^Talk 18:43, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

• Template:Multicol (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Col-begin (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Multicol with Template:Col-begin.
They obviously do the same thing and their auxiliary templates too. Dvorapa (talk) 14:23, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

support, assuming we also merge all the sibling templates (e.g., col-break, col-end, ...) Frietjes (talk) 22:33, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Post-orgasmic diseases

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. (non-admin closure) ~ Rob^Talk 18:40, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

• Template:Post-orgasmic diseases (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unnecessary navbox. Keilana (talk) 00:37, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Disagree. The template is useful. It groups together similar medical conditions and related terminology. It does not violate any of the WP:TFD#REASONS. POIS22 (talk) 14:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Rob^Talk 03:21, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).