Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 October 18

October 18 edit

Template:Film table edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:23, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Film table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

easier to just use a standard table, which requires less typing, and no kludges to surpass 50 rows. Frietjes (talk) 23:17, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Federal Shariat Court of Pakistan edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:24, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Federal Shariat Court of Pakistan (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 18:25, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Neuroepistemology edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:24, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Neuroepistemology (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 18:07, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Medcyclopaedia edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:14, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Medcyclopaedia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Link to a web encyclopedia which no longer exists. Feral mage (talk) 17:44, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • comment, I changed the link to go to archive.org, but I agree this should at least be deprecated. Frietjes (talk) 18:16, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. LT910001 (talk) 12:02, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Autotable5 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:27, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotable5 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Autotable5 big (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. although it is an interesting idea, I believe it would be better accomplished by changes to the backend software, or by introducing code to MediaWiki:Common.js. Frietjes (talk) 17:05, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Autocol big edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:31, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autocol big (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

seems we don't need this now that we have {{colbegin}}/{{colend}}/{{columns-list}}. replaced it in two places Canter's and Wikipedia:Kilometre (which we probably don't need either since {{convert}} has a |abbr= parameter). Frietjes (talk) 17:02, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox GAA player3 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:13, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox GAA player3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Merge/replace with Template:Infobox GAA player Magioladitis (talk) 09:29, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Alliance Aeroplane aircraft edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:20, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Alliance Aeroplane aircraft (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

There are only two entries. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:45, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep These manufacturer navboxes are a usual feature in aircraft type articles, and are useful even if they contain only two types.TheLongTone (talk) 09:05, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The fact that there are only two entries is irrelevant. This is a standard navbox type used across the vast majority (and intended to be used on all, but WP:DEADLINE) of aircraft articles; long-standing WP:CONSENSUS is that this is appropriate and useful to the Wikipedia reader. - The Bushranger One ping only 09:06, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Bushranger's explanation a standard navbox used in aircraft articles. MilborneOne (talk) 12:05, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - This is a standard nav box used across WikiProject Aircraft. These are helpful to the reader as they innumerate the types made by a manufacturer, even if there are only a few types listed. - Ahunt (talk) 13:51, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:UKSC case short edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:49, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:UKSC case short (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused fork of Template:Infobox UK Supreme Court case. eh bien mon prince (talk) 03:11, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox institute department edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:49, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox institute department (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The only mainspace instance was replaced with Template:Infobox academic division. eh bien mon prince (talk) 01:20, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Toy-linked animated and live-action television series edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:50, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Toy-linked animated and live-action television series (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The connection here between individual items is tenuous at best. Is anyone really navigating between Madballs, Rescue Heroes, and The Adventures of Teddy Ruxpin? —Justin (koavf)TCM 01:19, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete – Sufficient category exists (see Category:Works based on toys); ditto on its purpose, chronologizing doesn't really make much sense either, as does the indiscriminate (?) string of production companies. — Whisternefet (t · c) 02:11, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Virusbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:13, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Virusbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Three transclusions. Articles about viruses use Template:Taxobox. eh bien mon prince (talk) 00:26, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Indifferent; the virusbox was never embraced, and I'm not convinced there are editors in the field that know how to use it. Bob the WikipediaN (talkcontribs) 01:17, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom LT910001 (talk) 03:25, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.