Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 September 1

< August 31	September 2 >

September 1 edit

Template:Infobox adult actress edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by The JPS (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:08, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox adult actress (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and redundant, given the existence of Template:Infobox adult biography. Super Mario Man 21:31, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Drag Racing Team edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Swatjester (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Drag Racing Team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and empty except for a few categories. Super Mario Man 20:41, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ebaychatter0/sandbox/ship edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy deletion. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 20:56, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ebaychatter0/sandbox/ship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not being used anywhere or for anything useful. —Tom Morris (talk) 18:16, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this all you want. But Wikipedia should provide better areas to test templates. Template:X1, Template:X1, Template:X3, etc... are used by dozens of people who overwrite other people all the time. If that's not bad enough, the bot will clean those areas too. I propose removing them all together because those are useless. Ebaychatter0 (talk) 18:35, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:SwimmingAt2004SummerOlympicsVertical edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:28, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SwimmingAt2004SummerOlympicsVertical (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and redundant to Template:SwimmingAt2004SummerOlympics. Courcelles 16:13, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not used and duplicates functionality of another template. -- Whpq (talk) 18:19, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Title No Consensus edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:28, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Title No Consensus (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This simply transcludes some of the text from the policy page on consensus. It does not seem particularly useful, or a good idea: how is this template more convenient than simply posting a link to the relevant section of the page? Robofish (talk) 16:12, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused boilerplate. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 08:44, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I fail to see the need for such a template. -- Whpq (talk) 18:21, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:HistoryWiki edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:41, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:HistoryWiki (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

HistoryWiki is a small, moribund, open Wiki. As such it is in no way a reliable source, and should not be included as an external link (WP:ELNO 12). I guess we should remove the template from the 28 articles that use it before deleting the template itself. Grafen (talk) 10:35, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. No reason to link to such a small potatoes wiki. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 11:51, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No need to insult the site in the process, guys. Nevertheless, only the most active user-generated sites can be considered to have sufficient editorial oversight to be considered reliable enough to link to regularly via a template. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 08:26, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Sfd-t edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Relisted, see Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 September 9#Template:Sfd-t

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.