Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 October 24

< October 23	October 25 >

October 24 edit

Template:Infobox TfL line edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:36, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox TfL line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

after this edit, this template is now nothing more than a very simple frontend for the more fully featured template:infobox rail line. I suggest we simply substitute it in the articles transcluding it, history merge the appropriate history with template:London rail lines, then delete/redirect it. note that the field/parameter names in template:infobox rail line are also less ambiguous (e.g., is length line length or track length). Frietjes (talk) 15:30, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I'd like to see template:infobox rail line to be updated so that the title can be hidden, add "colour on map" and then add a switch for UK/US spelling. --Marianian^(talk) 00:06, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

colour on the map has been added. hiding the title may problematic due to microformat standards. however, I agree the logos + title are a bit redundant. Frietjes (talk) 18:29, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I Have changed District line article and it all works fine so I propose to delete I have moved the route map to infobox and will move the template of TFL lines to the District line template at bottom of page. Also the standard template allows for more information. Mark999 (talk) 00:35, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:RIOneWayPair edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:41, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:RIOneWayPair (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template. Dough 48 72 15:10, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Imzadi 1979 → 13:05, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:RI2xx edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:41, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:RI2xx (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template. Dough 48 72 15:10, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Imzadi 1979 → 13:05, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:RI4xx edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:41, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:RI4xx (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template. Dough 48 72 15:10, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Imzadi 1979 → 13:05, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2012–13 UEFA Champions League game A1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, per author request. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:50, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2012–13 UEFA Champions League game A1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:2012–13 UEFA Champions League game A2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:2012–13 UEFA Champions League game A3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:2012–13 UEFA Champions League game A4 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:2012–13 UEFA Champions League game A5 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I created them, but they are useless and blank. Stigni (talk) 11:03, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not used and serve no purpose. NapHit (talk) 13:02, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Why on earth did you create such a useless bunch of templates in the first place? Lukeno94 (talk) 20:18, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Because I thought they was useful but then I realized that are not... Sorry about that. Stigni (talk) 23:57, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:SFBaySports edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirect Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:49, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SFBaySports (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

better template at Template:Bay Area Sports, already linked. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:47, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

redirect Frietjes (talk) 18:30, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.