Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 June 20

< June 19	June 21 >

June 20 edit

Template:Doctl2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 20:08, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Doctl2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, completely deprecated with {{Documentation}}, just the same that {{Doctl}}. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 22:41, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Philmind edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 20:09, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Philmind (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

It does not appear that this template was ever implemented. The template Template:Philosophy of mind makes this one obsolete anyway. Pontiff Greg Bard (talk) 17:58, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:tilde edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirect to {{uw-tilde}} and fully protect. JPG-GR (talk) 20:11, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tilde (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This signature-notification template is older, less edited, and less functional than the more recent {{uw-tilde}}, which seems to have supplanted the original. BlueSquadronRaven 14:24, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, because regardless, deleting isn't the best approach in this instance due to the frequent use of both, and thus it would result in unnecessary confusion. If they're the same, just redirect one to the other instead of tfd. Be sure to WP:RFPP for full protection on whatever one is decided upon otherwise someone could vandalize the template thereby causing SineBot to make vandal edits to mostly new users. --slakr^\ talk / 16:24, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Roger Federer Nicknames edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted, author requested deletion. Jamie^☆S93 23:15, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Roger Federer Nicknames (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is a single use template without any links, so it's a list masquerading as a template. The creator is a newbie at templates. I suggest that we subst the template and then delete it. It just really has no place in Template space. User:Woohookitty ^{Diamming fool!} 05:42, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I'd even advise against its usage as subst since the content is essentially trivia with no significance in development of article. ^LeaveSleaves 05:46, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't think this would even deserve to be in his article at all, it's just cruft. TJ Spyke 16:05, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cinematic depictions of and references to Mahatma Gandhi edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 01:55, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cinematic depictions of and references to Mahatma Gandhi (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is essentially for trivia, exists on less than 2 dozen articles and simply seems superfluous. There is already an article, List of artistic depictions of Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, which treats the subject matter in a more extensive manner. The 22 or so pages that have this template could and should be better served by a "See also" link to the article that exists. Wildhartlivie (talk) 02:04, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The list provides a much better treatment of the subject than a template ever could—especially one defined so loosely as to include any cinematic reference to Gandhi. –BLACK FALCON ^(TALK) 05:08, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, agree this is trivia. Few or none of the other films listed will be relevant to a discussion of any particular film. Flowerparty^☀ 14:36, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Best Selling Wii games edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 20:12, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Best Selling Wii games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template is uneeded. It is just a duplicate of the info at List of best-selling Wii video games (the user actually blanked the article and replaced it with this template despite just having the same info). TJ Spyke 00:49, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – unused duplicate of a list article and should not be used per Wikipedia:Template namespace#Usage: "Templates should not masquerade as article content in the main article namespace; instead, place the text directly into the article." –BLACK FALCON ^(TALK) 05:05, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.