September 29 edit


Template:Sydney Locator Map edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 02:41, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sydney Locator Map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Infobox Settlement}} et al. Used three times only. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 19:34, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Japanese city short info edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 02:12, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Japanese city short info (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Infobox Settlement}}. Used twice only. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 19:32, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Where in Bangladesh edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was no consensus. I'm not moving it now, but a move can be discussed at the portal talk. delldot ∇. 04:44, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Where in Bangladesh (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Your Used once. Should be subst:d? Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 19:01, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep but move this section of the portal seems to be intended to change regularly and I can see why, given the complicated formatting syntax employed by the portal, they might want to simplify the task of changing it by providing the content in an easy to edit page but it really should be a subpage of the portal, that is how all the other portals I have seen have worked. - Icewedge (talk) 23:50, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Locality of Murcia edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 01:53, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Locality of Murcia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Infobox Settlement}}. Used four times only. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 18:57, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Template:Infobox Chubut edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 01:49, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Chubut (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Infobox Settlement}}. Used ~15 times only. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 18:45, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Voblasts edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 01:48, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Voblasts (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Infobox Settlement}}. Used six times only. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 18:42, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProject El Cor de la Ciutat edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 01:43, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject El Cor de la Ciutat (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I redirected this unused template, but now feel it should be deleted in conjunction with my MfD nom here for the pseudo "Project" it was related to. — TAnthonyTalk 03:10, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Pretty much the only reason you would have a redirect template would be if that template was already used anyways, which this one is not; redirecting is easier than going around and changing all instances of transclusion of the template, but there really is not reason to create a redirect to a template otherwise, kind of like categories. - Icewedge (talk) 06:13, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Uni edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. I'm not creating a dab page, but others are free to. United and uniting churches is an article that's kind of serving as a dab/list; we may want to move that. Anyway, that's an editorial decision. delldot ∇. 05:11, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Uni (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The concept behind this template appears to be sound, but this is a highly non-standard disambiguation template, and seems a highly inappropriate way to disambiguate these articles. It seems that this idea would more properly be executed as a disambiguation page of some sort with hatnotes on the affected articles. I would create the disambiguation page first, but I have no idea what one would call such a disambiguation page. However, this template seems fit to be deleted. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:57, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.