Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 February 25

< February 24	February 26 >

February 25 edit

Template:Telebabad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was withdrawn by nominator. Non-admin close. JPG-GR (talk) 17:51, 25 February 2008 (UTC) :Template:Telebabad (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) This template displays primetime programs of GMA Network from past to present, which could also be found in Category:GMA Network. Nominated for lack of noteworthiness. — Starczamora (talk) 12:16, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Retracted nomination, decided to discuss this with the editors instead. Starczamora (talk) 12:55, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Fairusenoalternative edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:08, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Useless template. Its text is the same WP:NFCC-1. All NF-images must comply with it. All NF-license tags allude to it. All NF-rationables must point to this apect. For what purposes do we need in template, which is saying only about WP:NFCC-1? Alex Spade (talk) 22:23, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I can only say "well duh!!" Happy‑melon 23:10, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the Dishpan!) 06:42, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete completely useless, it is already said in the rationale of images, and if the image doesn't have a rationale its likely to not have this template. — Save_Us † 00:40, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In case anyone's wondering, this template well pre-dates the current policies on non-free content, and was created precisely with the intent of easing the transition to a future policy which would be less tolerant of willy-nilly usages of non-free content, by easing identification of non-free content without free replacements. Johnleemk | Talk 07:53, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.