Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Geostrategy

Geostrategy edit

Mediation of this dispute has been completed. The case pages should not be edited.

To report a problem with the outcome of this case, contact the Mediation Committee.
If additional mediation proceedings are required, a new mediation request should be filed.
These case pages should not be edited, even to correct article content problems. Case pages are not indexed by search engines.

Resolved:

Inactivity.

This mediation case is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this case page.

view edit delete watch
Filed: 03:39, August 16 2006 (UTC)

Involved parties edit

Stevertigo (talk · contribs)
Perceval (talk · contribs)

Articles involved edit

Geostrategy

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted: edit

NONE.

Issues to be mediated edit

Writing form
Nature of topic
Claimed sources

Parties' agreement to mediate edit

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.

Agree. -Ste|vertigo 03:39, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. —Perceval 16:52, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee edit

Extend: Awaiting Stevertigo's return from wikibreak.

For the Mediation Committee, —Guan aco 03:36, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please, let's proceed with the mediation. Steve has returned from Wikibreak.—Perceval 07:07, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Accept

For the Mediation Committee, ^demon^{[yell at me]} 01:00, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I volunteered on one of the other pending mediations, and I'll do the same here. I'm not a member of the mediation committee, but I do have some experiance in various forms of mediation, and I'd be happy to try and resolve this dispute, if the parties consent. JCO312 20:28, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I consent.—Perceval 22:55, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

JCO, is it your intention to become a regular mediator? Why not first simply ask to join the medcom? There is surely a need for more assistance. In the mean time, Ill accept your offer, as long as you first openly state your own interest in the subject, as well as your point of view. The debate is already laid out on the talk page. Regards, -Ste|vertigo 18:16, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I volunteered to help with a couple of mediations because I saw that the medication committee was backlogged and I have some experience/education in mediation (although never in an online context). I didn't apply to be a member because I want to want to throw myself into a few mediations so I can get a better idea for the time commitment and such.

As far as the particular topic, I don't really have a specific interest in it. I do have a degree in political science, so I'm somewhat familiar with the topic, but my interest here is in dispute resolution, not in seeing a particular result on this article. As such, I don't think it would be appropriate for me to lay out my own personal view on what should happen. If you're still interested in working with me, I'll start a talk page (unless you both prefer email or some other method) and we can get started. Cheers, JCO312 18:48, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Let's get started on a talk page.—Perceval 00:39, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've started the talk page at Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Geostrategy. JCO312 01:05, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.