Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2023 December 28

Science desk
< December 27 << Nov | December | Jan >> December 29 >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Science Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


December 28

edit

density of mercury

edit

Hi. I'm trying to understand the answer to this question[1].

Assuming that the given answer on that site is correct: I don't understand why ρ is replaced with the value 3.6 * 10^3.

My understanding is that ρ is the density of mercury, so it should be around 1.35 * 10^4. At least, that's the value I get when I google "density of mercury in kg/m3".

Every other value I understand. Alpha is the surface tension of mercury in N/m. g is the acceleration due to gravity which is 9.8 m/s2. d is the diameter of the hole given in the question which is 70 micrometer. Liberté2 (talk) 00:10, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to clarify that this is not a homework question.
I remember seeing liquids unable to escape out of tiny holes, likely due to surface tension. So I was wondering whether there's a direct relationship between minimum hole size and surface tension. Googling that lead me to this physics stackexchange [2] which has the correct equation. I tried to search for some actual applications of this equation which lead me to that toppr.com page. Liberté2 (talk) 00:38, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't the foggiest, I'd agree with you. The only thing I can think of is they stuck in the density of the wrong material, but anyone in physics would know the approximate density of mercury. NadVolum (talk) 01:03, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The next step combines powers of ten and a few other factors (490 / 9.8), and the 3.6 changes to 13.6. So the 3.6 seems to be just a typo. --Amble (talk) 02:06, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you!!! It's indeed a typo. Liberté2 (talk) 05:24, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I should have noticed that, silly me, thanks. The 3.6 had nagged me a bit but I hadn't thought about it properly. NadVolum (talk) 14:25, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  Resolved