Wikipedia:Peer review/Cincinnati chili/archive1

Cincinnati chili edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because…I'd like to take it to FA and have never done that before, and it looks terrifying. I thought maybe some fresh critical eyes on it might be a good step.

Thanks, valereee (talk) 14:17, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Given the length of the article, suggest expanding the lead a bit more

Per this RfC, entries in an In Popular Culture section should have sources that indicate not only that the mentioned reference exists, but also that it is significant to the topic

Before going to FAC, I'd strongly suggest taking a look at the consistency of the citations. You basically want to ensure not only that the citations are complete and correct, but also that citations to the same type of source are similarly formatted. For example, footnotes 1 and 2 are both books but only one includes location; footnotes 4 and 27 are to the same source but one has the publication italicized and one does not; footnote 53 has page title but no other indication of the source; etc. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:33, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nikkimaria, thanks so much for your comments, I'll start in on them! --valereee (talk) 17:01, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]