Wikipedia:Peer review/Beebe Hydrothermal Vent Field/archive1

Beebe Hydrothermal Vent Field edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because…

It probably isn't a stub any more
It needs a second set of eyes, especially for any personal biases
There may be aspects of the page which I haven't considered but warrant a section
References may need a check

Thanks, Wünderbrot (talk) 19:57, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wünderbrot looks like you've had to wait some time for this review. Overall the article is well written, easy to read, and almost completely well referenced. I'd say it is a B class and have changed the class accordingly. I'd recommend you even consider nominating it for good article status as I'd say it's pretty close already. Cheers and thanks for your contributions, Tom (LT) (talk) 07:01, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]