Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Star Wars Jedi Knight: Jedi Academy/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Kept. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:00, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Uncited statements, especially in the "Gameplay" section. Z1720 (talk) 15:16, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
- Keep The uncited statements can be deleted with no real effect to the article, the complaint is not about the substance of the article as a whole. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 04:28, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- Zxcvbnm, I think that not describing the game's "gameplay" in any real fashion would be a significant effect on the article, no? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:25, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Ok, so someone removed text that was formerly cited and replaced it with uncited garbage. Then just revert it to the 2009 version of the text with the actual citation. I don't get people who say "woe is me, my hands are tied" when Wikipedia literally saves all histories of a page since its inception. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:39, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Zxcvbnm, I think that not describing the game's "gameplay" in any real fashion would be a significant effect on the article, no? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:25, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Zxcvbnm: It's sometimes not as simple as reverting the text: if an editor has added cited text to the article, reverting to an older edit might erase that additional information, so all of the text has to be checked to see if it should be in the article. There's still some uncited text: any interest in fixing this concern in the article? Z1720 (talk) 14:59, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- Added most of the remaining cites (two are left). One for the health and shield bars, which can be cited to an guide, but heard somewhere that it's not the best source; couldn't find anything better. Regarding the online I only found articles that said the publisher (that re-released the game in 2019) hoped the online would increase, but no reporting on the results of the hopes. —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 08:59, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- @LastJabberwocky: If the guide is the only source that can verify the information, then it's fine. When a better source is found, it can be replaced. If sources can't verify information, then it is better to remove it or change the text to reflect what is said in the sources. Z1720 (talk) 14:20, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- Added the rest of the citations; the online decline section now less useful but at least cited and working. —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 14:35, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- @LastJabberwocky: If the guide is the only source that can verify the information, then it's fine. When a better source is found, it can be replaced. If sources can't verify information, then it is better to remove it or change the text to reflect what is said in the sources. Z1720 (talk) 14:20, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.