Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Serbian Radical Party/1

Serbian Radical Party edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted The article has not been updated since being brought here. Wouldn't need much to update, just a few sentences describing the most recent election. The last section is still unreferenced. I think this could easily be brought up to GA standard, but unfortunately no one has shown any interest for nearly two months despite the appropriate projects and editors being notified AIRcorn (talk) 11:58, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article is outdated. Someone should write a few new sections about 2012 election and loss of support among voters, since SRP lost all of MPs in the National Assembly, while they had more then 70 members, also they lost a lot of MPs in the Vojvodina Assembly.

Also, the article has one unreferenced section (Electoral performance). --Wustenfuchs 23:20, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please notify the reviewer, nominator and primary contributors. You could update the article yourself. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:16, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not an expert about the subject and I don't know really what happen and what to search to expand the article myself. I need an user who know what's involved. --Wustenfuchs 22:43, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You didn't notify the Serbian Wikiproject or Filippusson (talk · contribs) about this review. The aim here is to improve the article not to summarily delist it. I have now done so for you. AIRcorn (talk) 23:09, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies. You did notify Filippusson, but they removed it from their talk page [1]. I guess that answers the question of whether or not they are interested in keeping this article at GA. AIRcorn (talk) 23:12, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't knew he erased my message. Well, I'll inform members of the WP Serbia at the WP's talk page. I'm sure some users will join the discussion. --Wustenfuchs 01:44, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This article also has one dead link. --Wustenfuchs 19:28, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]