Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/2022

This is an archive page for featured picture status removal debates. These debates are closed and should not be edited. For more information see Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.

2006 - 2007 - 2008 - 2009 - 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015
2016 - 2017 - 2018 - 2019 - 2020 - 2021 - 2022 - 2023 - 2024

Retained edit

Delist: Lynching edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2022 at 12:51:39 (UTC)

An unnamed person after being lynched in an unknown locale in 1925.

Reason: I think the photographic decisions reinforce a narrative, and it's not one I like: Not photographing the face is a photographic decision that reinforces the dehumanisation of the victim. The hat - seriously, why would he still be wearing a hat after a violent lynching - hides any evidence of beatings prior to the lynching. His neck is hidden by the collar, hiding the actual lynching except for a short bit of chain. His arms are tied, but that isn't particularly visible. It feels like this photograph was staged, the body arranged to lessen the violence, and hide the humanity of the victim.
There's also an extreme lack of documentation for this image. Other than knowing it comes from 1925, we don't know where it happened, we don't know who it happened to. And, I hesitate to say this, but the lack of documentation means we don't even know for certain this was a real hanging: stage rigs for fake-hanging someone aren't particularly complex. (Obviously, lynchings happen, but that would go some way to explaining some of the other features of the image).
Articles this image appears in: Leonidas C. Dyer, Lynching
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Lynching
Nominator: Durova

Delist — Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.8% of all FPs} 12:51, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You have good points and I remain undecided on this. Just a question: why is it "not possible" to have one's arms tied? I don't understand the rationale behind that statement. Bammesk (talk) 14:09, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Bammesk: ...I think I got autocorrected. I meant "particularly visible". Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.9% of all FPs} 16:12, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:35, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for delisting the image, and it’s still used in Lynching. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:35, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delist: Chestnut-headed bee-eater edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2022 at 05:38:22 (UTC)

Chestnut-headed Bee-eater (Merops leschenaulti), Kaeng Krachan, Phetchaburi, Thailand

Not for delisting: the new FP

Reason: Replaced by newly promoted FP File:Chestnut-headed bee-eater (Merops leschenaulti) Yala.jpg.
Articles this image appears in: None
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Merops leschenaulti - Kaeng Krachan.jpg
Nominator: MER-C

Delist — MER-C 05:38, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I will say background contrast is better in JJ's, but it's limited by the bird itself being so many fewer pixels. I'd be inclined to try to keep this one as a secondary photo in the article, though I think Charles' has to be the lead. It's at least a different angle that shows other details. It's unused at present, though, so unless something happens, it's not going to matter much Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.9% of all FPs} 11:51, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delist –~~ Bammesk (talk) 14:13, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Just to make this fun I've reprocessed from the RAW and reuploaded with full resolution. Now the old FP has more pixels, more detail and doesn't have a distracting background or half the head noise reduced to blur. JJ Harrison (talk) 22:27, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That... is a challenge. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.9% of all FPs} 13:11, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I struck my vote. Also, the nom image was added [1] to Chestnut-headed bee-eater earlier today. Bammesk (talk) 14:08, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Aye. By me. I figure it's worth considering. There's three images in the article, and, admittedly, that's probably too many. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.9% of all FPs} 15:01, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comparing the two, the busy background of the new FP isn't ideal in this case, IMO. Bammesk (talk) 16:04, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If it sticks, consider this nomination withdrawn. MER-C 03:12, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:48, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There isn’t enough support to delist this image, which is still used in Chestnut-headed bee-eater. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:48, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delist: Dream of the Fisherman's Wife edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2022 at 14:33:49 (UTC)

Dream of the Fisherman's Wife

Reason: I'm willing to stand up against censorship, but I'd like the image to be of FP quality first. This is just not a good reproduction. The restoration's decent as far as it goes, but the scan wasn't great and the colours are terrible. This version might be acceptable, if we can get it downloaded.
Articles this image appears in: Dream of the Fisherman's Wife and quite a few others.
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Tako to Ama, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Dream of the Fisherman's Wife
Nominator: Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.9% of all FPs}

Delist — Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.9% of all FPs} 14:33, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist — Tiouraren (talk) 03:49, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist – per reason above. Bammesk (talk) 03:47, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:53, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There isn’t enough support to delist this image, which is still used in numerous articles. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:53, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced edit

Delist and Replace: Dorie Miller edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2022 at 03:55:47 (UTC)

Dorie Miller, cropped - current FP

Full restoration (by me) - for replacement

Reason: Not quite sure why this was cut off in the original restoration; I presume in imitation of a magazine I found, combined with some really nasty damage to the tie that was... quite a restoration work.
Articles this image appears in: Dorie Miller +2
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Dorie Miller
Nominator: Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.7% of all FPs}

Delist and replace — Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.7% of all FPs} 03:55, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace - Yes, it was the tie damage that I didn't have the expertise to fix. However, I think the contrast correction (or did I turn up the shadows, I forget) was in the right direction, even if overdone. The original and this restoration are a bit dull. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 06:05, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Coffeeandcrumbs and MER-C: Done! Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.7% of all FPs} 15:56, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replace. @Adam Cuerden and Coffeeandcrumbs: are you sure you want to delist without replacement? MER-C 11:55, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm an idiot. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.7% of all FPs} 13:04, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Corrected. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 13:21, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace – Bammesk (talk) 15:56, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace – Yann (talk) 18:39, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 04:43, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced with File:Dorie Miller - Restoration, full.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:38, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delist and Replace: Wheatfield (F411) by Van Gogh edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2022 at 22:22:21 (UTC)

Delist

Replacement

Reason: Unused, replaced long ago in articles with a better quality image presented here as replacement.
Articles this image appears in: List of works by Vincent van Gogh, Wheat Fields
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/A collection of paintings of that strange wild man who roamed the fields of Provence
Nominator: --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs)

Delist and replace — --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 22:22, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace – Bammesk (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.2% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 07:20, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I wonder which one shows the truer colors? Looks like they are photographed with different color temperature lighting... --Janke | Talk 19:36, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There's no one true reproduction; brightness of light, sunlight v. artifical, and many other things will make it vary. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.2% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 02:37, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree with Adam that there is no true reproduction. However, two things convinced me the replacement is better:
  1. If you zoom really close at the barn in the replacement image, you will notice the foreground wall of the barn remains unpainted. You can also see streaks from brushstrokes painting the sky that reach down into area of the barn wall. In the delist, these notable features are not clearly rendered. The unpainted barn wall also looks more yellow than an off white color you would expect from the unpainted canvass. The sky also has unnatural yellow streaks which are a more natural brown streaks in the replacement. This all indicates to me that the lighting in the delist is too yellow. Similar things are noticeable when looking at the bottom left corner as well where the canvass has blank spots allowing your eye to adjust and see the delist for the low quality image it really is.
  2. It is possible to virtually tour the painting in the museum setting here. While it doesn't complete prove this is the "best reproduction", the Google tour shows that the replacement colors are much closer to what it appears like in its exhibition setting.
- Hope that helps. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 05:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace - Indeed. --Janke | Talk 14:37, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace – Choliamb (talk) 21:59, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Replace. MER-C 15:57, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace – Yann (talk) 20:41, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced with File:Korenveld - s0146V1962 - Van Gogh Museum.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:42, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted edit

Delist: Avocado edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2022 at 12:24:56 (UTC)

A ripened avocado fruit with its cross section

Newly promoted FP for comparison. Not for delisting

Reason: Replaced with newly promoted FP File:Avocado Hass - single and halved.jpg.
Articles this image appears in: None
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Avocado with cross section.jpg, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Avocado cross section
Nominator: MER-C

Delist — MER-C 12:24, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist – Bammesk (talk) 15:26, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist TheFreeWorld (talk) 08:51, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Janke | Talk 11:41, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.7% of all FPs} 03:15, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 13:22, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --The helper5667 (talk) 18:02, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:17, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delist: Shuffle edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 May 2022 at 02:46:18 (UTC)

A riffle shuffle being performed during a game of poker.

Reason: Noticed that this image fails the second criterion as its 1,024 × 731 pixels, being much too small for the minimum.
Articles this image appears in: Shuffling
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Shuffle, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Shuffle delist
Nominator: GamerPro64

Delist — GamerPro64 02:46, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist While I don't think we should delist historic FPs just because they're of resolutions too low for modern FPs, this hits a number of problems beyond that, like the unneccessary black and white. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.8% of all FPs} 16:56, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist. With no historical significance to this particular image, it would be easily replaced by a new image of appropriate quality. A different version of the same image appears to be available at double the resolution at File:Deuces Wild (44276782).jpeg but that is still low by modern standards and doesn't affect the other issues. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:21, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:14, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:46, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

While the discussion is bellow qourum, this unused image can't retain its featured picture status and is delisted. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:46, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delist: Northern mockingbird edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 May 2022 at 11:28:56 (UTC)

Northern Mockingbird, Mimus polyglottos, Humber Bay Park (West), Toronto, Canada

Not for delisting: the newly promoted FP

Reason: Replaced by newly promoted FP File:Mockingbird in Bay Ridge (85082).jpg.
Articles this image appears in: Residual uses, can be replaced.
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Mimus-polyglottos-002 edit.jpg
Nominator: MER-C

Delist — MER-C 11:28, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist – I forgot about this. Thanks. Bammesk (talk) 14:04, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist TheFreeWorld (talk) 17:07, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist UnpetitproleX (talk) 19:20, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist if it matters at this point (any image not in use at the end of a delist nom is delisted automatically) Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.8% of all FPs} 21:01, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:13, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:39, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delist and replace: Love or Duty edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2022 at 17:00:38 (UTC)

Love or Duty by Gabriele Castagnola, restored by Durova from an old Library of Congress Scan. Has a strong yellow cast (admittedly, attractive, but not accurate from what I can tell) and (relatively) low resolution

Proposed replacement, restored by Adam Cuerden from a better scan.

Reason: Quite simply, the Library of Congress has rescanned this, it's now far, far better quality than the one we used to have, and thus a much better restoration can be done. Also, given it's used on Chromolithography, cutting out the colour check on the right - which shows the inks appearing in it and provides a quick check that all of them were printed - seems counterproductive when it only adds value. A defining feature of Chromolithography is the number of inks used in the high-end stuff, which this demonstrates.

On the restoration, I've checked, and in other paintings of the same scene he made he put a paint spill on the ground about where there's a blotch in this one, so I think that blotch in the shadow between her and the easel is meant to be there.
Articles this image appears in: Chromolithography, and, perhaps more questionably, Gabriele Castagnola
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/"Love or Duty" and Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Love or dutyb.jpg
Nominator: Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.9% of all FPs}

Delist and replace — Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.9% of all FPs} 17:00, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace – Bammesk (talk) 01:46, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Replace. MER-C 05:33, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:06, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

While the discussion is bellow qourum, this unused image can't retain its featured picture status and is delisted. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:06, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delist: Su-27 edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2022 at 12:40:10 (UTC)

Su-27 on landing

Reason: Low quality, composition, not used in any article
Articles this image appears in: -
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Su-27 on landing
Nominator: Andrei (talk)

Delist — Andrei (talk) 12:40, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist, though it's probably academic at this point. There's basically zero chance of it returning to use. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.9% of all FPs} 13:54, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist. MER-C 05:32, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist – Bammesk (talk) 14:12, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:57, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

While the discussion is bellow qourum, this unused image can't retain its featured picture status and is delisted. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:57, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delist: Michele Merkin edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2022 at 18:37:43 (UTC)

Reason: Legs appear heavily photoshopped (where are her knees?), butt proportions seem way off, spine should likely have cracked.... Honestly, I think this was a reasonable FP for when it happened, and it should have been on the main page years ago. But it's far, far too late for it now.
Articles this image appears in: Michele Merkin, Handbra
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Michele Merkin 1.jpg Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image:Michele Merkin 1.jpg
Nominator: Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.9% of all FPs}

Delist — Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.9% of all FPs} 18:37, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist – EV, i.e. I don't see much in her article that relates to nudity in her career. Bammesk (talk) 02:23, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Not a horrible photo, but not featured quality. Looking at it, i fail to see any educational value. The helper5667 (talk) 03:35, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I think best case scenario, it's a photo of her, in her job as a model. However, it's also not even the lead image in her article. I have the vague idea it used to be in glamour photography, which I think would do a lot to justify it, but it's not there now. And then there's the... simply terrible usage from the original nomination. [2]. I somewhat feel bad nominating it, because I feel as POTD co-ordinator I should be a little more dispassionate, but it's also clear people are willing to spend three pages complaining about how bad of an image it is without taking any concrete action, so perhaps I can justify the nomination on the grounds of "I'm speaking up for people who will not listen to advice on proper forum to deal with the objections they're making". Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.9% of all FPs} 17:01, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am not familiar with the featured picture process so I have no vote, but I would like to point out that this picture is being discussed at Talk:Main Page#Planned POTD 2022-06-13 (File:Michele Merkin 1.jpg). Delisting this image does not resolve questions of what is or is not appropriate for POTD. Polycarpa aurata (talk) 03:45, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, if the objection is, as it was there, that the image isn't good enough for featured picture status, this 100% resolves the question. If there's anything else worth objecting to in the queue, I'm 100% sure I'll hear about it. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.9% of all FPs} 17:22, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That comment from a single user did not refer to the image's status as a featured picture. It referred to suitability as an image to be POTD. Polycarpa aurata (talk) 23:16, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This, not POTD, is the most appropriate venue to deal with quality issues. Other issues are irrelevant if quality isn't there, because quality alone can block it. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.9% of all FPs} 01:06, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delist – Exploitive, gimmicky, lacks EV. – Sca (talk) 12:51, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist – --Janke | Talk 15:46, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist - poor quality image, a poor example of the genre, an inaccurate likeness of the person, little if any educational value. Levivich 20:45, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nom, and per Levivich: this just isn't a good photo, and the EV is very low. Nick-D (talk) 09:59, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:16, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delist: Amanita caesarea edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2022 at 14:41:06 (UTC)

MIsidentified mushroom

Reason: Not used in any English Wikipedia articles, and per User talk:Sasata/Archive 23#POTD notification 2 it is likely misidentified.
Articles this image appears in: N/A
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Amanita caesarea
Nominator: --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE)

Delist — --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:41, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Although, since it's unused, it's basically automatic unless someone can find A. a good enough identification that we can use the image with confidence (Sasata's message may well be enough), and B. a place to use it. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.9% of all FPs} 17:58, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist – unused and uncertain identification. Bammesk (talk) 01:36, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist – --Janke | Talk 11:37, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist The helper5667 (talk) 22:13, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist pending correct identification and actual use in an article. At least the image itself is of high quality. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 16:42, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
To be fair, it is identified, sort of, but as a provisional species. Which means that until it's made an official species, it's in a limbo. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.9% of all FPs} 18:06, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Is this a good enough source to add it to List of Amanita species? There are other species in that list indicated as indefinite, and there is room for the image. I'd rather not do so myself, since the only thing I know about mushrooms is not to eat ones found anywhere except the grocery store. blameless 21:53, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The name has definitely made its way into the literature, but (just from some quick googling) it looks like the species hasn't been formerly named yet. For example, it has an entry in this book, which is from a university press. (The lead author is a prolific mycologist.) This seems to be the original (but not formally published) description; at least, it's cited in at least one scholarly paper. But this isn't a straightforward situation. Josh Milburn (talk) 22:20, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:45, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delist: Ivan the Terrible and Harsey edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2022 at 14:42:32 (UTC)

Ivan the Terrible and Harsey

Suggested replacement: Not tiny, not bad quality, exists.

Reason: Tiny, bad quality, nothing to replace with
Articles this image appears in: none
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Ivan the Terrible
Nominator: Andrei (talk)

Delist — Andrei (talk) 14:42, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
https://dezoomify.ophir.dev/#https://rusmuseumvrm.ru/fullimages/dz_canvas/z-4401/dzc_output_files/0/0_0.jpg from https://rusmuseumvrm.ru/data/collections/painting/19_20/zh_4401/index.php?lang=en ? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.9% of all FPs} 21:27, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist and replace Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.9% of all FPs} 21:58, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  - That is rather bad digitization on my humble opinion. And its watermarked. I am often opposed cloning out trash from photos, but cloning out a watermark from the painting is basically equal to conservation/restoration. Not acceptable under any circumstances. --Andrei (talk) 22:04, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Fair point. It's better, but maybe not there. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.9% of all FPs} 22:37, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist – Bammesk (talk) 01:41, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist (t · c) buidhe 20:56, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace --Yann (talk) 21:16, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:23, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:36, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delist: Uranus edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2022 at 09:19:02 (UTC)

False-color image

Replace – higher quality version

Reason: This image is not used in any articles, and has no longer EV
Articles this image appears in: None
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Uranus
Nominator: The NMI User (talk)

Delist — The NMI User (talk) 09:19, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It was replaced with File:Uranus as seen by NASA's Voyager 2 (remastered).png. MER-C 11:22, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Replace. MER-C 18:59, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Per MER-C, I would support a delist and replace nom. Bammesk (talk) 16:19, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I mean, if it's not used in any articles, it's an anti-Semitic at time of closure. Delist if it matters Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8% of all FPs} 16:56, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We shouldn't delist FPs every time they are replaced with higher quality versions of themselves. The image is used in articles (just not the older version). Bammesk (talk) 17:26, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It happens, though. Have to renominate Love and Duty, for instance. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8% of all FPs} 17:55, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, I introduced the newer version, Support delist and replace. Bammesk (talk) 18:10, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
...and replace is fine with me. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8% of all FPs} 18:15, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:30, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

While the discussion is bellow qourum, this unused image can't retain its featured picture status and is delisted. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:30, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delist: Landscape Arch edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2022 at 18:35:23 (UTC)

Landscape Arch