Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of tallest buildings in Baltimore/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was removed by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 21:17:17 29 September 2019 (UTC) [1].
List of tallest buildings in Baltimore edit
List of tallest buildings in Baltimore (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Notified: WikiProject Skyscrapers
This list was nominated back in 2008 and has not aged well. The lead is 3 short sentences. The history section is a giant largely unsourced blob of a paragraph that is very difficult to read (having many run-on sentences). It uses out of date terminology (ex: "this list...."). Building 16 is unsourced. The section on under construction or proposed is out of date (says buildings were completed last year). And many of the proposals run afoul of WP:CRYSTAL being simply speculations (some are from years ago and nothing happened). The notes use a strange outdated mode where note A has sub note a and b in it? The sources are almost exclusively Emporis, which uses user generated data (I believe) and thus is not the most reliable source. Also, none of the many image have alt-texts. Anyway it's a mess. Mattximus (talk) 15:20, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist. It needs a lot of work to come up to standards. --Golbez (talk) 14:02, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist – the fact that it has multiple tags and an only 3-sentence lead says the star should be removed ASAP – zmbro (talk) 02:46, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been removed, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:17, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.