Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Best MLS Player ESPY Award/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:30, 30 April 2018 (UTC) [1].[reply]

Best MLS Player ESPY Award edit

Featured list candidates/Best MLS Player ESPY Award/archive1

Nominator(s): MWright96 (talk) 07:21, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Next up from the ESPYs stable, the Best MLS Player Award, which was introduced in 2006. As with the previous two lists nominated under my name, all comments and suggestions on how to improve the list are very much appreciated, and will be attended to as soon as possible. MWright96 (talk) 07:21, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 09:20, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Put (MLS) after your first use of Major League Soccer, and then use the abbreviation.
"three and five choices " -> "three and five nominees "
"which period generally includes a portion" I don't think you need "period" here.
"Cuauhtémoc Blanco " needs a diacritic.
As does "Luciano Emílio".
"Dwayne De Rosario " -> de to De.
FC Toronto is actually Toronto FC, isn't it?
Multiple winners table -> those with the same record should be listed in alphabetical order.
Same for countries.

The Rambling Man (talk) 12:22, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man:. Thanks for your suggestions. All of them have been implemented into the list. MWright96 (talk) 13:19, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support my concerns addressed. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:20, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Kosack (talk) 16:25, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

"is presented to the professional Major League Soccer player", as the MLS is listed as a fully professional league, isn't professional redundant as all players in the league are professional?

Just a small point. Kosack (talk) 15:35, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Kosack: I'm inclined to agree. Removed. MWright96 (talk) 15:54, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Minor issue addressed, no further concerns. Kosack (talk) 16:25, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support No concerns. Courcelles (talk) 18:50, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source review –

All of the references are well-formatted and the link-checker shows no dead links.
~~What makes SB Nation (ref 15) a reliable source? If I'm not mistaken, this is a site of blogs, which we wouldn't normally consider reliable.~~
- The aforementioned source has been replaced with one from Bleacher Report. MWright96 (talk) 05:19, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Spot-checks of refs 12, 14, and 21 show that the content is adequately supported by the cites, ~~although I do think it's odd that ref 12 has a different title than the cite shows. It's possible that the site changed it since it was added.~~ Giants2008 (Talk) 21:14, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- That was an error on my part which has now been corrected. MWright96 (talk) 05:19, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - With my couple of issues addressed, I consider this source review to be passed. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:07, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:02, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.