Vertical exaggeration (VE) is a scale that is used in raised-relief maps, plans and technical drawings (cross section perspectives), in order to emphasize vertical features, which might be too small to identify relative to the horizontal scale.[1]

A vertically exaggerated mountain. In reality, the terrain would appear much flatter.

Scaling Factor edit

The vertical exaggeration is given by:

 

where VS is the vertical scale and HS is the horizontal scale, both given as representative fractions.

For example, if 1 centimetre (0.39 in) vertically represents 200 metres (660 ft) and 1 centimetre (0.39 in) horizontally represents 4,000 metres (13,000 ft), the vertical exaggeration, 20×, is given by:

 .

Vertical exaggeration is given as a number; for example 5× means vertical measurements appear 5 times greater than horizontal measurements. A value of 1× indicates that horizontal and vertical scales are identical, and is regarded as having "no vertical exaggeration." Vertical exaggerations less than 1 are not common, but would indicate a reduction in vertical scale (or, equivalently, a horizontal exaggeration).

Criticism edit

 
A NASA projection of Maat Mons on Venus, with vertical exaggeration used to emphasize the mountain's height.

Some scientists[2][3] object to vertical exaggeration as a tool that makes an oblique visualization dramatic at the cost of misleading the viewer about the true appearance of the landscape.

In some cases, if the vertical exaggeration is too high, the map reader may get confused.

References edit

  1. ^ "Vertical Exaggeration". 11 September 2007. Archived from the original on 2007-09-11. Retrieved 8 November 2023.
  2. ^ Morrison, David (3 March 1992). ""Flat‐Venus Society" organizes". Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union. 73 (9): 99. doi:10.1029/91EO00076. accessed 11 March 2019
  3. ^ Robert Simmon (5 November 2010). "Elegant Figures - What Not To Do: Vertical Exaggeration". NASA Earth Observatory, earthobservatory.nasa.gov. Retrieved 11 March 2019.