Duplicate images uploadedEdit

Thanks for uploading Image:Branxholm Tower.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you uploaded the same image twice: as Image:Branxholm Tower.jpg and also as Image:Lg 213-2.jpg. The latter copy of the file has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 03:32, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Dover BeachEdit

Thank you for the addition to the Dover Beach page. I was unaware of this echo of the poem. Mddietz (talk) 21:11, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

It's the basis for the NY Review of Books article "The Rattle of Pebbles"[1][2] by Jason Epstein, which in turn was the inspiration for his Book Business. My mother, who is in a nursing home now, recited the poem to me word-for-word, which sent me to your article. Zelchenko (talk) 04:12, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 9Edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thelma Schoonmaker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Schoonmaker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

AcrylamideEdit

Something went wrong here [3]. Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 23:38, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generationEdit

Your upload of File:Charles H. Kerr Irving Meirovits Stock Certificate 200dpi.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:32, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas Goodspeed (September 17)Edit

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Primefac (talk) 22:20, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!Edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Thomas Goodspeed concernEdit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Thomas Goodspeed, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Thomas GoodspeedEdit

 

Hello, Zelchenko. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Thomas Goodspeed".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 18:57, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Zelchenko (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #16904 was submitted on Nov 15, 2016 10:13:40. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 10:13, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!Edit

 Hello, Zelchenko. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Futurewar Screenshot from Cyber1.png listed for discussionEdit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Futurewar Screenshot from Cyber1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 00:42, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Futurewar Screenshot from Cyber1.png listed for discussionEdit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Futurewar Screenshot from Cyber1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Futurewar Screenshot from Cyber1.png listed for discussionEdit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Futurewar Screenshot from Cyber1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Sparkline editsEdit

Hi there. I appreciate your passion on the Sparkline article. When I say "poorly sourced" I do not mean that it's true or not, just that there is no source. If Edward Tufte has made statements about the inspiration for sparklines that can be cited per Wikipedia convention I would be happy to work with you to integrate them into the article as appropriate. Thomas Craven (talk) 14:51, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi Zelchenko. I see you've rolled back Sparkline again. Let's connect to discuss what's needed citation-wise and how to integrate Peter Zelchenko's contributions to the development of sparklines in an appropriate way. I'll add a section at the bottom of Talk:Sparkline and we can work through it there. I'd love to help add encyclopedic content with citations. I don't think the existing article meets Wikipedia's standards though, so we'll need to improve/reformat it. With a proper source, I'm sure that will be doable. Thomas Craven (talk) 14:14, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

→ Edit to also thank you for adding the link to the Wayback Machine. It doesn't address all the information in the caption (which might also belong in the main text), but it is a great start! Thomas Craven (talk) 14:16, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

→→ Apologies, editing again to add that I have just now seen your additions to my user page! I will dig in some more later, but it looks like there's a lot of notable stuff I can hopefully help find links for and add to appropriate articles. Many thanks! Thomas Craven (talk) 14:22, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter messageEdit

 Hello, Zelchenko. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Sustainability critique page or indexEdit

Andy Couturier just popped up again on my radar with his new book. He was just here in Shanghai. Need a page or index that grabs all of these (if just to show how transient they really are). Remember Foer 12 x 12, Affluenza, Elaine St. James, Joe Dominguez and Vicki Robin, Duane Elgin, all the way back to Emerson, Franklin, etc.

ArbCom 2018 election voter messageEdit

 Hello, Zelchenko. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter messageEdit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)