User talk:WereSpielChequers/Archive 34

Home

Bling

Content

Userboxen

Editcount

Talk

Guestbook

Email

This is my archive for threads from 2019 that mainly relate to deletion.

Revdel request

Hi WereSpielChequers, Hope all is well,
Could you revdel this and all edits thereafter please, Many thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 11:10, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

I'm well thanks and hope you are too. One revision deleted and one account blocked. Thanks. BTW Do you fancy coming to Meta:Meetup/London/139? ϢereSpielChequers 11:19, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi WereSpielChequers, Good good and yeah I'm great thanks, Brilliant thank you, Thanks for the offer it's very kind of you but given the recent "issues" in London I'd rather not go there, Truth to be told I wouldn't enjoy it, I went up there nearly 10 years as a birthday treat and even then the bombings etc were constantly on my mind and now given the stabbings that are happening everywhere I'd rather stay far away as possible but thanks for the offer it's much appreciated :), Take care, –Davey2010^Talk 14:26, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi Davey, that's a shame. Truth is the pub we use isn't anywhere near as rough as some think, and it is in London, a very safe city with less than a tenth of the murders that New York was getting a generation ago. ϢereSpielChequers 20:53, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Deleted article from 2005

I noticed that your user page mentions that you take deleted article requests. I've never made one before, but I think I might like to. I wrote a request for an article at Requested articles for Fishtail braid. I didn't really know how to write an article about it (I know how to write an article, but I'm not sure how to approach this article in particular), but I did want to read about one, and I think that that could meet notability standards. There was a version of the article that was deleted in 2005 and I have no idea on whether or not it could be helpful. Clovermoss (talk) 17:12, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) I wonder why it wasn't redirected to Hair styles per policy? Perhaps it wasn't policy in 2005 of course. Still, wouldn't get away with a close like that today...  :) ——SerialNumber54129 18:36, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi Clovermoss, ordinarily I would restore, draftify or userfy and let you loose on it. But in this case, as per the deletion nomination "WP is not an instruction manual" the article is simply instructions as to how one would make a fishtail braid. Plus a reference to Vogue, but without either a page number or even an issue number. Sadly even my beard isn't long enough to test those instructions with, so I couldn't test it, but if I were you I would start from scratch. As for SerialNumbers point about linking, it was considered in the AFD, but at the time there was no mention of this sort of braid in the relevant article. However, since the deletion was because it was instructions as to how one does such a braid, there is absolutely nothing stopping you or anyone else writing an actual encyclopaedia article on the subject. ϢereSpielChequers 19:06, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the answers Serial Number 54129 and WereSpielChequers! I might get past writer's block and write the article eventually (or someone else at Request an Article will first). Clovermoss (talk) 20:01, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Go for it! Topics that affect 50% of the global population? "I'm lovin it" 👀 🐞 🎶 ——SerialNumber54129 20:20, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

RevDel request

Per RD3, can you redact this blatantly abusive and disruptive edit summary [1] from the page RS-68? funplussmart (talk) 22:58, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi funplussmart, while I don't agree with that edit, the tone of the edit summary or its use of all caps, I see this as an intemperate content dispute, not something which merits redaction of the edit summary. ϢereSpielChequers 23:14, 22 December 2019 (UTC)