Welcome! edit

 
Some cookies to welcome you!  

Welcome to Wikipedia, Twisha.K! Thank you for your contributions. I am Aranya and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! – Aranya (talk) 21:50, 20 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

About Dr. Falguni Vasavada-Oza edit

  Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Dr. Falguni Vasavada-Oza a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. -- a they/them | argue | contribs 23:55, 20 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Falguni vasavada edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Falguni vasavada, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 01:25, 21 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Falguni Vasavada edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Falguni Vasavada, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 13:11, 22 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest edit

  Hello, Twisha.K. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Falguni Vasavada, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. ... discospinster talk 15:59, 22 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

November 2019 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 17:13, 22 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Unblock edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Twisha.K (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi, this is my first article and I have been trying to write an article on Falguni Vasavada who is a known personality whose info is not available on wiki. While my 1st ver of the article, may seem to have some irrelevant info but I attempted to make it specific and informative in 2nd ver. Now that I have understood the promotional policy, I would make sure my further contribution adheres the policy and there is no need to block as I wish to make active contribution on wikiTwisha.K (talk) 19:45, 22 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

No thanks. If you can convince us you understand why this is inappropriate and tell us what subject areas you'd write about instead, areas for which you have no conflict of interest, you are welcome to request another block review. Yamla (talk) 19:48, 22 November 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Re-Review edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Twisha.K (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi Thanks for providing opportunity to explain, I would be keen to write about the Person, Early life and Career also the earlier post was inappropriate as it was inadvently more of praising the person by providing lots of irrelevent information Twisha.K (talk) 20:04, 22 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

As you've been told, we don't want you writing about that. The problem is just with what you wrote, but the fact that you wrote it at all; please review some of the posts above. Until you can explain what you did wrong and tell what you will edit about instead, since you won't be allowed to edit about your professor, there is no reason to lift the block. For this reason, I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 20:28, 22 November 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No, we aren't interested in having you do that. Please reread the policies and guidelines we've pointed you to. --Yamla (talk) 20:05, 22 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Unblock Re-Review edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Twisha.K (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Inadvently I was Inflating the Resume and trying to make a famous personality information which is against the Conflict of Interest Policy Twisha.K (talk) 20:30, 22 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

See below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:38, 25 November 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

We aren't interested in having you write about Falguni Vasavada. At all. There are a billion other subjects you could write about. What else are you interested in writing about? --Yamla (talk) 20:34, 22 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Unblock Re-Re-Review edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Twisha.K (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi Thanks for advise, Wish to drop writing on Falguni Vasavda howerver would certainly wish to contribute wiki by writing on Sports in Rajasthan to start with followed by Sports in diifferent districts like Ahmedabad, Surat Twisha.K (talk) 20:45, 22 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

See below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:38, 25 November 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Twisha.K (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello, I do understand the mistake now could you pls unblock to start my contribution Twisha.K (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Your contributions so far have not been very useful. You would need to give us an example of an edit that you would like to make. Edits like this do not really improve Wikipedia. It seems like you made this pointless edit simply to game the system so you can spam our website. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:38, 25 November 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Talk page access revoked edit

You now have three open unblock requests. To prevent you further abusing the unblock template, I have revoked your talk page access. Another admin will be along eventually to review your unblock requests. If declined, that leaves you with WP:UTRS. --Yamla (talk) 13:42, 24 November 2019 (UTC)Reply