User talk:TriiipleThreat/Archive 9

Active discussions

Happy New Year, TriiipleThreat!

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

CfD discussion you may be interested in commenting on

Here. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 01:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Joker (character) nominated for deletion

You are invited to take part at the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joker (character). DarkKnight2149 23:15, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Minor awards

Thanks! I'll take a look. In the meantime, regarding a similar issue about top-ten lists, you may want to comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film#Re "Top ten" vs. "Top ten list" in Carol and List of accolades received by Carol (film). --Tenebrae (talk) 18:29, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

  The Teamwork Barnstar
Thanks for all the work you did to help get Black Panther (film) ready for the mainspace. And thanks for being a continued friend and colleague in working on the MCU articles. :) - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:55, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Black Panther (film)

 On 2 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Black Panther (film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Wesley Snipes had been interested in portraying the Black Panther in film for more than 20 years, before Marvel Studios officially announced Black Panther in 2014 with Chadwick Boseman in the role? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Black Panther (film). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Black Panther (film)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Vanamonde (talk) 12:13, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jon Bernthal as Punisher.jpg

 

Thanks for uploading File:Jon Bernthal as Punisher.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:19, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Runaways (TV series)

 On 19 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Runaways (TV series), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the upcoming television series Runaways was first developed in 2008 as a feature film by Marvel Studios but was shelved due to the success of The Avengers? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Runaways (TV series). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Runaways (TV series)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:02, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Runaways

Whya have you deleted Runaways from MCU? It's already confirmed and filming is already started.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lado85 (talkcontribs) 08:14, February 19, 2017 (UTC)

Beacuse it has not been confirmed to be a part of the MCU.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 14:27, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Cloak & Dagger (TV series)

 On 26 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cloak & Dagger (TV series), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a version of the Freeform television series Cloak & Dagger had been in development since 2011, when the network was still known as ABC Family? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cloak & Dagger (TV series). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Cloak & Dagger (TV series)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Civil War II

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Civil War II you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Argento Surfer -- Argento Surfer (talk) 17:21, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

I appreciate your quick response to my review. I wanted to let you know that I will be offline until Monday so you wouldn't be anticipating a reply from me this weekend. Argento Surfer (talk) 20:02, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks, that'll give me sometime to work on the collected editions.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:44, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
@Argento Surfer: I see you have completed your review, unfortunately I do not think that I will be able complete it until Monday.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:56, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

If you have a second

Hey Triiiple. Since you have file mover rights, if you have a second, can you move File:AoS LMD poster.jpg to File:Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. season 4 second pod poster.jpg? It will be more in line with the other season posters we have for the series, as seen in Category:Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. seasons. Thanks! - Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:47, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

  Done.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 04:04, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Much obliged! - Favre1fan93 (talk) 04:10, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Civil War II

The article Civil War II you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Civil War II for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Argento Surfer -- Argento Surfer (talk) 20:02, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

  The Good Article Barnstar
Thank you for your continued work on keeping all MCU articles up to snuff and helping promote Doctor Strange to good article status. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:09, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Move request

A request to change the title and content of a comics article has begun at Talk:X-Men (film series)#Requested move 7 April 2017. Any interested WikiProject:Comics editor may comment there within one week. --Tenebrae (talk) 01:29, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Wonder Woman

Hi, TriiipleThreat. Please note that I reuploaded a new Wonder Woman infobox image, this one being a .png file as opposed to a .jpg file. The previous image you uploaded is not the one used from Justice #5, but rather one from Ross' website, as part of his personal collection. Wonder Woman.png is from the original cited source, Justice #5, and has a color scheme from the actual comic. I discuss this in the Wonder Woman Talk Page. I also reduced the size of Wonder Woman.png to 248 x 392, just as you did for Wonder Woman.jpg. DrRC (talk) 21:17, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

It is the original image, I edited it myself removing the text.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:22, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Connected User on Elon Musk

With this edit you were reported as a connected user on the article Elon Musk. I may have missed something but this edit was made by Auric. This intrigued me as a speedy glance at the histories of both the article and the talkpage don't show me you declaring a COI, but I might have missed something. If this is accurate could you please provide a diff formally acknowledging the COI? Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 19:05, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, that never happened. Thanks for pointing this out.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 19:07, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
@Auric: Do you care to explain this?--TriiipleThreat (talk) 19:11, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
I'm drawing a blank. That was in 2014. I must have had a good reason, I just can't think of it.--Auric talk 19:36, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Parameter

Hello, I've been away for a few months and now I'm adding the parameter you suggested for drafts. It's nice to put films and TV shows' drafts in a specific category. Thanks for informing me. --Captain Assassin! «TCG» 19:08, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Scarlet Witch

You took issue with my changes but Scarlet Witch is not included in the xmen navobox either and considering that box is more full of actual xmen characters it stands to reason she would be associated with the correct franchise with which she has been long identified with since 1965 which is the avengers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.190.220.239 (talk) 14:05, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Scarlet 2

Alright just want to things consistent and accurate I have done some work with the uncannyxmen.net website so that stuff is important thank you for also removing the xmen navbox part. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.190.220.239 (talk) 14:43, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

This isn't just my own POV on the Get Out film

Just how many sources does it take to get this information included? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.53.51.129 (talk) 02:46, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

This would be best handled at Talk:Get Out (film) and try to build concensus based on reliable sources and Wikipedia policy.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 02:51, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Guardians Vol. 2

Hey, just wanted to say I hope you enjoy the film if you are seeing it at all this weekend. I'm going Friday afternoon, and will be back to the page shortly after. Adam's been on it for the past week, so hopefully it is not totally in shambles. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:08, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:2008–09 North American winter

--Anonymous Ryan (talk) 00:49, 5 May 2017 (UTC) please don't put this draft in the natural sciences category. It's not applied to the other winter articles have it. This just to keep consistency amongst the series of articles

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Defenders (comics), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defenders (TV series). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Why did you delete my edit

You deleted my edit on Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2, the images I used were copyright free. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ANDREWs13 (talkcontribs) 00:59, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

No, they belong Marvel / Disney which you have disingenuously claimed as your own.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 01:06, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

I did not mean to do that, they are still copyright free.Also, you violated the three-revert rule, the last edit that you reverted I did not claim to be mine and YOU uploaded one of the images. if you do not undo the reverts that you did, I will have no choice but to report you and get you blocked.(ps I am going to go back and fix the copyright on the GOTG images)— Preceding unsigned comment added by ANDREWs13 (talkcontribs)

No, they are copyright protected and I will not undo my edit. The fair use rationale only applies to use in the infobox in their respective articles.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 01:25, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
  • I've declined the report for reasons given on ANDREWs13's talk page. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:42, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Avalanche

Is this something worth mentioning in the article? 2602:304:CE74:9630:F547:54CF:BB57:887D (talk) 11:33, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Normally I would say no, but considering that there have been very few appearances/mentions of the character in other media it might be worth a mention. If the characters starts making regular appearances in other media then we should reconsider.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:22, 16 May 2017 (UTC)


Dark Universe

You deleted my photograph, even though it passes the Wikipedia fair usage checklist. It is a historical photograph and pertinent to the page as it showcases the shared universe's primary cast for the first time.--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 20:15, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

I already respond to your initial thread on the article's talk page.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:16, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the headsup. I'll go check it out.--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 20:40, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Meh

It reads better your way. I think technically it's not "needed", but however optional it's still better. Hijiri 88 (やや) 13:30, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:34, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Wonder Woman edit

Why did you undo my edit on Wonder Woman? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ANDREWs13 (talkcontribs) 22:57, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:David Tennant as Kilgrave.jpg

 

Thanks for uploading File:David Tennant as Kilgrave.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Nebula in Avengers 3

Hey. I need your help. The description of Nebula in Avengers: Infinity War is wrong. She is not a member of Guardians. Can you change it? I can't because the page is protected. Enjoyer of World (talk) 00:16, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

This is a good question to ask at Talk:Avengers: Infinity War.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 06:30, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

The best writer of an article about superhero films, hello from Russia.

KeymixGame (talk) 17:08, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Thank you.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 18:19, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Reversing my edits

Why in the world are you reverting my edits on List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films page? You didn't state a reason.--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 22:26, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

We are only including images of recurring filmmakers.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 22:46, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Mindless Ones in Doctor Strange film

I was under the impression that this was original research. Was I mistaken? 65.126.152.254 (talk) 23:31, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

It is unless verified by a reliable source.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 00:09, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

See

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Oppulence76 Doug Weller talk 13:44, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Riri Williams.jpg

 

Thanks for uploading File:Riri Williams.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Page mover granted

Hello, TriiipleThreat. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, and move subpages when moving the parent page(s).

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! — xaosflux Talk 19:15, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Miss America (dab)

First thanks with the moving and renaming for Madeline/Chavez pages and helping cleanup disambiguations afterwards.

With Miss America (Marvel Comics)‎, since its being used as a disambiguation, does it's talk page still need to be redirecting to Madeline's page, or should we blank it and replace with just a wikibanner? Just wanted to check before I changed anything. WikiVirusC (talk) 10:27, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

No, I believe we can remove the redirect. Thanks.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 10:29, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

^_^

KeymixGame (talk) 04:00, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Renner injury

FYI, in the second paragraph of the article, it says Speaking at a Karlovy Vary Film Festival press conference on Friday for Taylor Sheridan’s “Wind River,” the actor said he fractured his right elbow and his left wrist. I do see how Renner said he "broke his arms", so I'm fine with either. But since what I added is in the article (not my diagnosis), I think it is more appropriate to state that, since (trying to pull from high school anatomy class here) they are both joints, but now I'm just being technical about it. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:28, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

I must have missed that. Very well then. My apologies.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 17:47, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
No worries!   Just wanted you to know it was in the article. I zeroed in on the actual injuries without seeing it as "broken arms" and you must have zeroed in on the "broken arms" without seeing the actual injuries stated. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:12, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Just saw this which seems to call out and contradict the Variety article. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:03, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
I see. In that case we can remove it entirely.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:08, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
I was thinking since it was most likely referring to the untitled film, not Infinity War, we could move the info there. But since it didn't happen during the production, and Renner claims it will not hinder his ability to film scenes for the untitled film, I agree we can just remove the info altogether. I will get on that. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:44, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Maybe you'd feel like weighing in here

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Comics/Marvel_Comics_work_group#Suggestion_for_the_Template:Marvelwiki

Since you receted my citing of the site maybe you'd have an oppinion here.★Trekker (talk) 12:19, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

SDCC/Stranger Things

Thanks for finding that photostream from the Stranger Things SDCC panel we can use (free images, yay!) One quick thing as I'm at work and can't do it as quickly: If you see how I did a similar cast shot for Fringe (TV series) could you upload a cropped version of the full cast and place it like I did on the cast list there? We can then place it horizontally and give more space to call out the visible cast members. --MASEM (t) 15:46, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

@Masem: I like the idea but I don't think the images that Gage took really lend themselves that well to that format. The image in the Fringe article is taken from the center and is aligned horizontally. Gage's images are from one side and a bit skewed. You could try something like at Futurama#Voice actors and create a table with individual images.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 16:00, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
That's true, the skewness may be a problem. Oh, well, we have lots of other images from his flicker to help (I've already added a few more). --MASEM (t) 16:02, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Reverted my edit

You just deleted my addition to Kamala Khan's page and said it was a poor source....since when is Screenrant a poor source?!--50.232.205.246 (talk) 00:07, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

That's not what you cited, look again.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 00:12, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Absorbing Man and Zzzax

Are these[1] and these[2] reliable sources? 2600:1700:E820:1BA0:8517:14D3:64AD:6731 (talk) 04:18, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Nurseline247 AN/I

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. DARTHBOTTO talkcont 01:29, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Be careful of your silly reversions

I write regarding your reversion here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Guardians_of_the_Galaxy_Vol._2&oldid=prev&diff=769830930. What nonsense! If date A precedes date B, then obviously date B cannot be "first". The film was always scheduled to be released before 5th May -- for example, in the UK, when it was released on 28th April .. per my edit. (And, as it turns out, the release was even earlier, on the 25th April in Australia, New Zealand and Italy. Again, this was known at the time you reverted to 5th May.) Please **fact check** before undoing people's work, and improve their edits rather than rejecting them with silly rationales. Thanks. Tomalak Geret'kal (talk) 21:06, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) The lead of a film article should include the absolute first release, plus the release in the country of production. Triiiple was 100% correct in restoring the edit, because, at least with MCU films, there are always film premieres which satisfy the "first" release (which April 28 was not), and then May 5 for "country of production" release. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 22:21, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
@Tomalak geretkal: Yes as Favre pointed out May 5th was always going to remain in the lead because it is the US release date so you were wrong to remove it. You also provided no source that April 28th was the first release date. I was correct that the film's premiere on April 10th turned out to be the first. WP:FILMRELEASE suggest to use both the first release and the release in the country of origin. In the future please familiar yourself with Wikipedia guidelines before editing.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:44, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Your Recent Revert

Could you please explain this edit? I've seen other film articles use more than one genre in the lead.

There are lots of mistakes on Wikipedia.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 11:07, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

D Roopa IPS

I recently created this article and it's been just deleted saying that this article contains the contents of the article that was previously deleted.

I found this article in draft and I want to republish this article. Can I do it by editing from the draft?

--Kiranmadhu.e (talk) 17:24, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

@Kiranmadhu.e: You should address the concerns of the AfD before attempting to republish it.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 17:36, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Guardians of the Galaxy reversion

First of all, the only reason you give for reverting is a link to a page. You don't link to the section. There are six shortcuts you could have used (assuming that's the section you're referring to).

What's in the section, in those articles, called "Cast" is mostly talking about the characters. It is not just about the cast members. And what it does say in the section on MOS:FILM is "If roles are described outside of the plot summary, keep such descriptions concise." Concise would be no more than three sentences. And if the character has its own article, then there should be no more than a one-sentence description in the list. —Musdan77 (talk) 21:40, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

The section headers are labeled as outlined in the MOS. Besides only the first sentence is about character. The rest is real world context about the actor and the role; the actor's insight, preparation, etc. It need not be a simple list. Also please remember to sign your comments.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 12:26, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Ah, I forgot to sign. I guess it's been a long time since I've had to comment on a user page about an incorrect or unnecessary reversion. Nowhere do I see anything saying as you say about section headers. In WP:TVCAST, it clearly says 'Cast list: In a section labeled "Cast" or "Cast and characters"' (and 'Characters list: In a section labeled "Characters" or "List of characters"'). And I think it should be the same for films. —Musdan77 (talk) 21:40, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
I understand, it's like when I have to point out the obvious that Guardians of the Galaxy is a film, not a television series and the MOS in question makes several references to a "Cast" section (in quotation marks), not a "Cast and characters" section.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 22:00, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Generations-related

As you know, the final two parts of the Generations anthology is coming out today. I was wondering what you have thought of this anthology? --Rtkat3 (talk) 16:07, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Without getting into a off-topic conversation, I'd say it is pretty hit-or-miss.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 22:25, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Can I get your eyes on this draft

Discussion of the production section revamp seemed to of died down, to the point where I'm probably going to have to get the draft going on my own, but I wanted to see if you had any input on the draft I proposed since you were one of the editors who expressed concern about where it was going. I would still like to say something about presenting casting news in a more readable way so if you have any suggestions there too, that'd be great. You can find the discussion here Thanks. --Deathawk (talk) 06:57, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Venom

I'm a bit confused about your thinking with those edits. Your "clarified" version of the lead is not at all what is sourced in the article. If a less experienced or anonymous editor had done that I would have reverted it straight away as vandalism. - adamstom97 (talk) 21:36, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

I've started a topic on the article's talk page.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:50, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

X-23

Hi Triiiple, I just saw that you started a draft on the potential X-23 film. I am letting you know that I threw something together for it at User:Adamstom.97/sandbox/9#Laura film yesterday if you wanted to use any of that. - adamstom97 (talk) 21:18, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

@Adamstom.97: Excellent work! Feel free to copy it over.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:46, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Jane Foster Picture

Is the picture not supposed to show the character in their most recognizable form? The image I added features Foster as herself and as Thor. HarrisonSteam (talk) 21:09, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

@HarrisonSteam: It features Foster as Thor and as her cancer stricken self, which is not her "most universally recognizable appearance".--TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:24, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
@TriiipleThreat: Really? I can't really think of one definitive form for Foster outside of as Thor. If I can find a picture of Foster as her healthy self alongside herself as Thor, could I place that picture? HarrisonSteam (talk) 21:48, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Really? She has existed for over 40 years and until recently as a medical professional. Possibly, depends on the image.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:53, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewing

Hello, TriiipleThreat.

I've seen you editing recently and you seem knowledgeable about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 09:45, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

 Hello, TriiipleThreat. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

Merry Christmas!

I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. If you don't like Christmas or just don't celebrate it in any of its forms, then please accept a generic "Happy Holidays". If you celebrate no holidays at this time of year, then hopefully you will be satisfied with an even more generic "Season's Greetings". :) BOZ (talk) 01:04, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas to all!

  We wish you a Merry Christmas and a prosperous New Year 2018!
Wishing you and yours a Merry Christmas, and a Happy, Glorious, Prosperous New Year! God bless!    — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 09:23, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Seasons' Greetings

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 16:33, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

  Happy Holidays
From Stave one of Dickens A Christmas Carol

Old Marley was as dead as a door-nail. Mind! I don’t mean to say that I know, of my own knowledge, what there is particularly dead about a door-nail. I might have been inclined, myself, to regard a coffin-nail as the deadest piece of ironmongery in the trade. But the wisdom of our ancestors is in the simile; and my unhallowed hands shall not disturb it, or the Country’s done for. You will therefore permit me to repeat, emphatically, that Marley was as dead as a door-nail.

So you see even Charles was looking for a reliable source :-) Thank you for your contributions to the 'pedia. ~ MarnetteD|Talk 23:15, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

  Thanks and Merry Christmas! Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 18:33, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "TriiipleThreat/Archive 9".