User talk:TriiipleThreat/Archive 4

Active discussions

Captain America: The First Avenger

Hello. I'm copy editing the article at the request of Darkwarrior and have spotted a possible problem in its Marketing section. Please could you take a look at User talk:Darkwarriorblake#Your GOCE Request and comment? Thanks in advance. --Stfg (talk) 10:02, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

No problem, dunno how I missed that one award though, double checked it. Thought "Well I've got the ref handy, might as well hit a bunch of articles at the same time", save others the trouble. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 17:04, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

First Avenger

Threats are unbecoming, especially ones that are cut and paste by someone who is not an administrator. Your reverts are basically pointless since they are linking to an article about a mere shape and not the artifact that is clearly being portrayed in the film. The shape of the tesseract tells nothing about the source material on which the film is based, and is a redundant inclusion on the article's plot outline. Linking to the Cube is relevant given the film's source material, and allows a reader further insight into the material that brought about the creation of the film. Ganthet2814 (talk) 20:10, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

That was no threat and please use the article's talk page to resolve any disputes you may have. Thank you.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:13, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
If my dispute is with your edits, then it seems more appropriate if I direct my comments to you. Also, saying that I will be disciplined is a threat. Ganthet2814 (talk) 20:17, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
They are not just my edits. You appear to be edit warring with other editors as well. If you continue you will be blocked. Again this is not a threat. Thank you.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:19, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
"If you don't stop doing A, B will happen to you." That is a threat, regardless of your semantics. Thank you. Ganthet2814 (talk) 20:31, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
No, its a warning. One that I highly suggest you heed. Thank you.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 22:11, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia blackout

I just got a press release from the Wikipedia Foundation saying English-language Wikipedia is staging a 24-hour blackout on Wednesday to protest (as well it should) the SOPA legislation before Congress. Darn good way to get people's attention to that frightening bill.--Tenebrae (talk) 01:33, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Hawkeye (comics), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ghost Rider (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited X-Men: Schism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Javier Rodriguez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Request for comment

This is a neutral request for comment at Talk:The_Hobbit_(2012/13_film)#New_title.3FTheLastAmigo (talk) 00:43, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Avengers UK Title & release date

Hi, I added a section about this on the Avengers film talk page. Richiekim (talk) 15:10, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Neutral notice

This is a neutral notice to members of WikiProject Comics that two discussions of interest are occurring at Talk:Comic Book Resources#Requested move and Talk:Comics Bulletin#Requested move. --Tenebrae (talk) 15:32, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Smithsonian Institution Archives Edit-a-Thon and Meetup!

Who should come? You should. Really.
She Blinded Me with Science: Smithsonian Women in Science Edit-a-Thon will be held on Friday, March 30, 2012 at the Smithsonian Archives in Washington, D.C. This edit-a-thon will focus on improving and writing Wikipedia content about women from the Smithsonian who contributed to the sciences. It will be followed by a happy hour meetup! We look forward to seeing you there!

...and if you do not live in the Washington, D.C. area, please forgive the intrusion and you can delete this invite! Sarah (talk) 20:30, 8 March 2012 (UTC)


Thanks for your edits at the Box office section of Thor (film). Just wanted to assure you my edit-summary comments were not directed at your edits, but at an earlier editor whose work has been the subject of discussion since before this past October. Your stuff is as judicious and well-reasoned as always. With regards, --Tenebrae (talk) 14:03, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

No problem, I figured they weren't.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 16:34, 9 March 2012 (UTC)


Hello, TriiipleThreat. You have new messages at Darkwarriorblake's talk page.
Message added 03:05, 17 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Darkwarriorblake (talk) 03:05, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Avengers-2012-film.gif listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Avengers-2012-film.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:04, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

No need, I'll voluntarily remove it.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 23:14, 22 March 2012 (UTC)


It's quite alright, I wasn't put off or anything. I also think "Later" is a better option. I didn't read the whole paragraph, and "also" to me seemed like something was being connected to so I changed it to "In addition".  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 18:57, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Hey T3, I added some info about pre-release tracking to the Avengers article and the source I used has been updated to include some more info. Rather than try and fit it in I wanted to see if you thought it was worth it first. It mentions this Ultimate Marvel Marathon thing where they sold out tickets a month in advance to see a marathon of the five Marvel films before the midnight launch, and the other part just mentions the date/countries where the film will be first wide released.Darkwarriorblake (talk) 17:24, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Alright, what about the Marvel Marathon thing? Is that worth mentioning as a marketing and/or release event? I don't quite understand how big an event it is based on that article, don't know if you do.Darkwarriorblake (talk) 18:36, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
OK, also saw this thought you might find it interesting, don't thnik there is enough there to warrant it's inclusion in the article though. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 22:14, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
"Marvel Avengers Assemble" :( I gotta admit, I'm kinda angry that Disney thinks we're too stupid to differentiate between a film about comic heroes and an old film about a British TV Show and so gave us this offensively bad title. - EDIT Also this lists it as "Marvel's Avengers Assemble" and this as "Marvel Avengers Assemble". Seems to be some lack of clarity on how the Marvel is presented but it does seem to be Marvel Avengers Assemble. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 11:34, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
I'm not quite sure how it could be worded but I think it is interesting information. Post release for instance, where available, I add gender and age breakdowns when I can because I think some people will be enlightened by how certain audience types react. There is a lot of pre-release tracking for Avengers and I think that info will be really good when it is actually released, to compare the anticipation with the reality. So I think it would be worth including.Darkwarriorblake (talk) 13:43, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Also I just saw this. I don't know if any of those photos are of interest to you, I'm not quite sure how but I could try to contact the person who took them to see if they'd let one go for use in the article.Darkwarriorblake (talk) 13:55, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Hmm...tough question...probably Box Office since it's tied to predictions on the financials. Would make it easier to compare against the actual takings. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 18:41, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Avengers vs. X-Men

Thanks for the compliment. :-) I usually stay away from large-scale editing on those crossover articles (aside, perhaps, from basic copyediting or organizing), and I don't even intend to read AvX. The only reason I started and maintained the "Fear Itself" article was because I was present at the press conference at which Quesada, Alonso and Brevoort announced it, and took photos of the event, so I felt that gave me an advantage in getting the article started. Nonetheless, I did some copyediting/cleanup to the AvX article. I hope you find it helpful. Nightscream (talk) 20:30, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

I would prefer only to protect a page after placing warnings on the IP's talk page fails to work, or if the disruption comes from multiple IPs. There is only one IP making any recent edits to the article, with only one that was clearly disruptive The only one that appears inappropriate was the last one, so I left a message on that IP's talk page. If it continues, I'll intervene with more decisive measures. Nightscream (talk) 20:49, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

Hi. When you recently edited Wrath of the Titans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zimbo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 5 April 2012 (UTC)


Much better the way you did it. I hadn't wanted to just revert the other editor entirely, since he did find a cite, and I did try to base what seemed salvageable on what was done on another comics-movie page, but your edit tied it all together pretty seamlessly. Just wanted to say, Bravo, dude. --Tenebrae (talk) 03:16, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Avengers (roster members)

Hello, TriiipleThreat. I'm sorry, I don't speak english. Ce message est au sujet des récentes modifications de Avengers (comics). Je suis désolé mais il est évident que vous vous tromper. Car la série Avengers Assemble est considéré comme parlant de l'équipe actuelle des Avengers. Allez voir sur ou sur, et vous comprendrez que lors de l'événement Avengers vs. X-Men, Storm a quitté les Avengers, et que Black Panther, Black Widow, Thor et Hulk les ont rejoins durant la séries Avengers Asemble. Ils apparaîssent d'ailleurs tous comme mebres actifs dans New Avengers #26 qui est sortit en librairie hier et dans les récents numéros de Amazing Spider-Man durant l'événement de End of the Earth et plusieurs sites sur les comics les présentent comme meembres actifa. Donc s'il vous plait arrêtez d'enlever mes modifications. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 22:00, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Denisof, Gjokaj and Johnson

Just so you know, Alexis Denisof plays a character called "The Other". Enver Gjokaj is in the film as a New York cop and Ashley Johnson is a waitress who has a crush on Captain America. The last two may not be notable roles, but the first one sure as hell is! – PeeJay 00:27, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Still needs to be referenced by a reliable third-party source.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 00:39, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

Hi. When you recently edited Thor 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alan Taylor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Neutral notice

This is a neutral notice to members of WikiProject Comics of a discussion of interest at Talk:Blackmark (novel)#Move?. --Tenebrae (talk) 16:02, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Hey, Triiiple T -- If you know of editors in WikiComics Projects who might additionally like to comment on the above, please let them know. Things are starting to get ugly there, and a larger variety of editors commenting might cool things down. Lordy, lordy. --Tenebrae (talk) 18:43, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
As a newcomer to this article, I really don't know any other editors who might have an opinion on this. You might want to post a notice at WT:COMICS. Also after reading much of the discussion, favor doesn't seem to have sifted too far just a couple of more outspoken editors. I know it sometimes get hard not to take these things personally especially after all the time and effort you have put into it but the only thing I can advise is to let the discussion take its course. If the move is indeed blocked I think you'll find after while you'll get used to it and find other concerns to rack your brain over. At least thats usually the case with me. Good luck!--TriiipleThreat (talk) 19:23, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

List of The Avengers: Earth's Mightiest Heroes characters

Not sure. I can't remember which episode they called out his name, nor which one they referred to him as, so I'd have to go back and rewatch to verify. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 16:15, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

The Avengers

I think they should at least be acknowledged as part of the cast. Maybe add them back once the movie hits theatres and it's a known fact? And i think Stanton's cameo would be notable, he is a notable actor. RAP (talk) 16:48 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Perhaps, depending on the size of the roles. Stanton is a very notable actor but his role in this film might not be that relevant. Stan Lee is mentioned because he has a notable connection to the project; being a creator.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 17:25, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
Dude, just saw a press screening. It's everything you could want, and even a little more. I'm actually going to pay to see it again when it comes out. No spoiler to say they finally did the Hulk right. --Tenebrae (talk) 19:18, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Absolutely. I'd be happy and even honored. --Tenebrae (talk) 19:27, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Avengers Assessment

I don't use those assessment's period, because it's a sample size. I detest using things like "universal acclaim" or "universally panned" because "universal" implies basically everyone and since we only get a small sample size it's not responsible of us to apply such generalizations. I get that RT or MetaCritic are doing it, but I've always been against it. The same with the words "acclaim" or "panned"; they come across as personal opinions (again, it's RTs and MC's opinions). I tend to just stick to the data and let that speak for itself, but that's my personal philosophy. If the page is going to reflect an outside sources interpretation of reviews, then I think we should wait till it has more than 30 reviews from either site. Considering that once it is released in the US there will probably be closer to 200 reviews, it seems better to wait.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 14:25, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

I'd say so, because we probably should not be quoting a site that has like 6 or 9 reviews (or whatever it is).  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 14:51, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Just to temper my note to Triiple above, yes, of course, I agree with Bignole in favor of the most neutral wording (as I'm sure Triiip does, too). See my note from a few minutes ago at Talk:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2. --Tenebrae (talk) 19:20, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Hey T3, saw this and thought it was somewhat remarkable but I don't know if is something that is a big deal in the US. Was going to add it myself until I saw where it was from so thought I would ask your opinion on if it was worth while.Darkwarriorblake (talk) 17:23, 26 April 2012 (UTC)


Hi. Thank you for contacting me about this issue about the book title! Although Marvel's website lists the book as "Avengers Vs. X-Men: Versus", the solicitations they sent to every specialized comic book websites refer to the book as "AVX: VS", such as Newsarama, Comic Book Resources, Bleeding Cool and so on. The book is still referred to as "AVX: VS" in the May, June and July solicitations; it seems weird to think that Marvel would keep sending the solicitations to all websites with the wrong title. Maybe someone should contact one of their representatives to clarify this out. Thank you for your attention! — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 20:17, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Message from Mitchell-16

What note are you referring to? I only stated the release dates for the film in the republic of ireland and the UK, it is relevant as the film is already out there. Mitchell (talk) 21:25, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

There is an editor's note in the same sentence you edited referring you to the guideline on release dates. The film is out in lots of places, we only include the earliest release date and the release date in the country of origin.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:30, 26 April 2012 (UTC)


Hiya, Triiip. Didn't know it was you removing Para from the lead. I'm leaving it tillI speak with you, since I know you know your stuff. Could you go over the rationale with me, though? Onscreen and on the poster and in the press material, it all says "Marvel Studios in association with Paramount Pictures," so I'm not we can go against the official credits. If Para put money and resources into it, then the fall under "production studio" — as many Hollywood companies still are, in addition to distributors. In any event, that's what the "in association with" credit generally means — like "Marvel Studios in association with Fairview Entertainment" as the onscreen credits for Iron Man 2. Let's talk when you get a chance.--Tenebrae (talk) 13:45, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Absolutely — I must have skimmed right past this on the talk page. We should probably add a sentence to this effect somewhere in the article body specifically to explain the onscreen credit; otherwise, if we're any example (!), it could be confusing. In fact, there's probably a sentence about Paramount turning over the production in the article already, and we can just add a phrase within it to explain how that resulted in this specific onscreen credit. --Tenebrae (talk) 15:55, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Looks like an edit-war may be brewing over a separate issue at The Avengers (2012 film). Just a neutral head's up. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:07, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Ah, geez! Sorry. I just assumed it was a straight copy-paste of text. Didn't occur to me it might be from a video. My apologies. It's one thing for a professional organization to have that issue; it's a much different and more understandable thing for a civilian. I'm like Ralph Kramden here: "Me and my biiiiig mouth!" Mea culpa, mi amigo. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:05, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
And thank you for catching my website-attribution error. I have no excuse!
Well, I do have a rationale, at least, for why my brain is distracted -- I've just finished writing a far-too-short (650-word) Avengers feature for my newspaper. Let me know if you want to see it when it comes out Friday -- we've been colleagues long enough I don't mind being non-anonymous with you. --Tenebrae (talk) 16:39, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

This is a neutral notice of what may be a brewing edit war at The Avengers (2012 film) regarding the consensus comprise re: Thanos. --Tenebrae (talk) 20:02, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Of course. It hadn't occurred to me. Rest assured that what is revealed above has no bearing on the body of the film itself. See you on the flip side. --Tenebrae (talk) 20:26, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Triple, I haven't been following the article intentionally but why is it being referred to by name as the Cosmic Cube? Was there a discussion about that because it's only referred to as the Tesseract in the film and in the plot it's being flat out called Cosmic Cube, not even Easter Egg linked. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 21:29, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Oh have you not seen it yet? Glad I didn't spoil anything for you then, I assumed you had. Well I've removed it anyway, they were just literally referring to it as the Cosmic Cube throughout the plot. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 21:41, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

I've requested page protection for The Avengers, the level of activity is ridiculous and minor edits are being lost to larger vandalism or ignorance of consensus.Darkwarriorblake (talk) 12:27, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

The jerkoff declined it O_o, not enough recent activity. Just ya know, the last 24 hours of constant reverts and undo's. Need JGreb. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 12:44, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Apropos of this, I've just given Darkwarrior some well-deserved kudos on his talk page, as I gratefully give you now, over all the effort you and some of our other colleagues are putting in to keep out the fancruft, the vandalism and the plot bloat out. It's going to be rough there for a couple of weeks. --Tenebrae (talk) 00:00, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Found this, don't know if the talk about the wanting to go cosmic Marvel and that was the origin of the alien invasion and such would be of use to the article or not. ALso says that Joss was the one who came up with the leader being Thanos. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 19:10, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

I'll have a go in an hour or so, just working on some course stuff at the minute. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 21:54, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

The Avengers

You did a good job with the Avengers article. I am proud of you. In fact you are such a inspiration that I came back from my semi-retirement and start to be involved with expanding and bettering a lonelier upcoming film article on my own. Keep up the good work. Jhenderson 777 13:58, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

  The Comics Barnstar
For your dedicated efforts upholding the standards of Wikipedia verifiability, tone and more at all Marvel Cinematic Universe articles and especially now The Avengers (2012 film), where your solid efforts helped stabilize a contentiously edited article and exemplifies Wikipedia collaboration. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:28, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
I actually got you and Tenebrae mixed up....but like I said it looks like another editor did that already. ;) Jhenderson 777 21:03, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Neutral notice

This is a neutral notice that an edit-war appears to be occurring at The Dictator (2012 film) and other editors are invited to observe and weigh in to keep it from escalating. --Tenebrae (talk) 16:39, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Will do. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:53, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Digital "D'oh!"

That makes much more sense that what was there! And I'm sure there's an RS cite for this somewhere. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:53, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

  Not that I don't appreciate everything you do! Darkwarriorblake (talk) 15:52, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
Lol, very timely choice. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 18:51, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Thor 2

  Hello! Your submission of Thor 2 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 03:45, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Template:Marvel Cinematic Universe

I have started a discussion about whether or not Villains should be included in the 'Marvel Cinematic Universe' template. Your opinion would be greatly appreciated. Spidey104 14:27, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Neutral notice

This is a neutral notice to frequent editors of The Avengers (2012 film) that the page may be in danger of an edit-war, with one editor unilaterally changing the first line in a way contrary to consensus determined by admin J Greb here. For the sake of the article's stability, editors may wish to pay attention to this page.--Tenebrae (talk) 13:10, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Avengers Assemble.jpg


Thanks for uploading File:Avengers Assemble.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 07:44, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Thor 2

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Mjolnir (comics)

Better, but do we know that Marvel 2099 is not the future of Earth-616? (Or is that why you qualified the phrase with the word "primary"?) I guess it's okay. Thanks for the compromise. Nightscream (talk) 17:00, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

But that designation has never been in the comics, has it? The Multiverse provides no citation for that assertion, and the Marvel 2099 indicates that that designation is derived from the OHOTMU books, which most other members of the Comics Project reject as an RS. Ah well, whatever. Like I said, "primary continuity" takes care of it, I think. :-) Nightscream (talk) 22:07, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

ScreenRant etc.

I would like to hear your opinion on here on if these sources are reliable/unreliable. Jhenderson 777 20:43, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Revert in Captain America: The First Avenger

Whats the problem? I simply add a member of cast, and with two references (now I add also Imdb source). --Kasper2006 (talk) 06:41, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

The "cast", strictly speaking, are those persons listed in the cast credits. A body double is, by all industry standards, part of the "crew," like stunt men. I'd ask Kasper to please be more collegial in his tone at the movie's talk page, and I'd also note that Wikipedia disallows IMDb as a non-reliable source. --Tenebrae (talk) 15:39, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

The Avengers (2012 film)

This is a neutral notice of an edit-war occurring at The Avengers (2012 film) --Tenebrae (talk) 13:24, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

I agree with you. I would say that if a reliable-source trade magazine — not a consumer hobbyist site — were to announce that such-and-such a studio had announced it was going to make such-and-such film, then I would consider that credibly reported news. I think you're right that a wish-list comment made in a casual setting is not any formal commitment by a studio. --Tenebrae (talk) 19:30, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi, T. I hadn't looked at The Avengers (2012) film when I answered, and was just responding to a general question. I dunno — I'd say that if it's Disney chief Bob Iger saying The Avengers 2 is in development, that's about as official as it gets. Our saying "in development" seems accurate enough — a film can be under active development even before a screenwriter or director is announced, as a studio auditions screenwriters, for example. And again, you're right that we should be very careful to differentiate between active development and WP:CRYSTAL. --Tenebrae (talk) 19:42, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Mark Ruffalo pic

sorry, i didn't mean to overwrite it, I just wanted to upload the cropped copy. Xpinkxcasualtyx (talk) 22:08, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Dardevil franchise

What do you think. Daredevil and Elektra a "Daredevil" franchise? Sounds subjective to me but I respect your opinion. Jhenderson 777 20:37, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

The name of it is more the reason. Daredevil doesn't even appear in Elektra. Tie-in's are proven unnecessary when the Marvel Cinematic Universe was divided....and I felt that it was logical that being divided if MCU is divided...if you know what I mean. Jhenderson 777 21:03, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Iron Man in film

That sounds like a reasonable idea. We might need to have contribution history to be moved along with Iron Man (film series) on though if this will be a redirection. Jhenderson 777 02:13, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

comic book characters based on mythology

in the comics, the characters based on mythology, specifically Loki and Thor, is it necessary to put "based on mythological deity" where it says "created by"? to me, that doesn't make sense to put it there, plus it states that they are based off the deity of the same name in the first paragraph of the page. so couldn't we take it out of the info box altogether? Xpinkxcasualtyx (talk) 19:06, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Its not needed in the infobox, I just more objected to use of word "character" when referring to mythological beings.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 19:15, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
So you agree we could just remove it altogether?Xpinkxcasualtyx (talk) 19:35, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Remove it if you want, I really don't have a strong opinion on the matter.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 19:47, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
I understand, I just wanted a second opinion before I edited anything. Thanks :) xx Xpinkxcasualtyx (talk) 20:13, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Regarding the Black Widow movie

Hello friend, I dont want to sound mean or anything, but seriously did you even see the reference that I included?? Firstly you tell me that it's not in development which is sonething I never said, and then you say its not anounced when it actually is. I don't know why you weren't convinced with that reference but here are some more links to persuade you:

1 2 3

I could show you more links if you wanted or you could find some yourself but they all are pretty much the same. It is clearly confirmed by the producer himself Kevin Feige that there will be a standalone film featuring Black Widow. I also found out there are plans about a standalone Nick Fury film but didn't find enough info for that. I hope you take all these in consideration and if I am wrong by all means please prove it to me. I wish you the best and eagerly await for your reply!

DingleMr (talk) 18:00, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

All of those cites are actually just copy-catting of the original source, which is this interview in Movieline. I've placed the verbatim quote below. I'm afraid he's not actually announcing a Black Widow movie — he's just saying Marvel would like to have one at some unspecified future point in time. That's much, much different from saying, "We have an Iron Man movie set for 2013" or "We have Thor 2 scheduled for 2014."

[Question] There’s been talk of Scarlett Johansson’s Black Widow getting her own spin-off films. How far along are we from seeing the next female superheroine in her own story?

[Feige] Well, I think you saw it in Avengers. I think that’s one of the many amazing things Joss Whedon can do. I think people are going to be surprised by how powerful Scarlett is in this movie, and how evolved her role is. We have already planned her next appearances and where to take that character because we believe in it and we believe in her in a big, big way. When will there be a standalone? Both is what we’re heading toward. A lot of it is that we’re only going to make two movies a year, maybe sometimes it’ll be one movie a year like this year, maybe someday it’ll be three movies a year just depending on what comes together. But really, it’s two movies. So there’s kind of a backup on the runway right now in terms of when can something go. We do like when some of the characters appear in other people’s movies. ... And that’s [i.e. "other people's movies"] probably where you’ll see Black Widow next.

--Tenebrae (talk) 19:09, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Norman Osborn

You know that situation we have had with Thanos on the Avengers movie. Well I am worried we are going to have that with Norman Osborn on the TASM page. Just be prepared. ;) Jhenderson 777 20:08, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

I don't think is name is mentioned. That's why I am worried. But this character is definitely set up to return in the sequel. All I know is this actor is portraying the supposed character and he is mostly used in a cameo and also used in the post credit scene. ;) Jhenderson 777 20:23, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

black widow image

could we use the image of scarlett as natasha from the avengers in place if the one from iron man 2?Xpinkxcasualtyx (talk) 05:03, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

There's no policy saying that you cannot. However my opinion is the IM2 image is better as it shows more of her costume and has more significance as the first officially released image of the character.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 05:43, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

MCU Cast Table

The issue I'd had with it is that the table is a lot more difficult to get information from in its alphabetized form. Obviously, Tony Stark is a more notable character (and certainly higher-billed and more involved in the series) than Christine Everhart. It struck me as sensible that the four primary stars of The Avengers (themselves the stars of their own movies first) followed by the secondary characters / primary characters who were not stars of their own movies, followed by the secondary casts of the previous films (in order of film release and billing of those films) would be the logical order of listing the casts. It's troublingly awkward to read in its original form (particularly with most of the non-leading characters appearing only twice). The listing of all multiple-appearance characters gives them all due appearance and appropriate weight, but if we list casts of characters on film pages in order of billing/importance, then I feel we should reflect that in cumulative cast tables as well. Rickie-d (talk) 21:28, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Can we not in that case do the following:
  • In order determined by the credits of The Avengers (as that is the culmination of the series thus far), followed by
  • The order determined by the credits of each movie, in release order (for those that weren't in The Avengers)?
It's an impartial, unbiased ordering determined by the films themselves. Thoughts? Rickie-d (talk) 21:37, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
I believe that the films suggest that themselves. Both Thor and Captain America end with a stinger leading into The Avengers, with the latter ending with a full trailer for the film. Iron Man closed by referencing the entire series to come, The Incredible Hulk featured the previous film's lead discussing the events to come, and Iron Man 2 leads directly into Thor. The series couldn't be much clearer about all of these films leading up to The Avengers. Rickie-d (talk) 21:43, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Except there is an in-universe chronology. And that aside, the films' release order supersedes that from a non-in-universe perspective anyway. We can re-evaluate the situation once Phase Two is further in (or even upon the release of the Avengers sequel), but as far as accuracy and logic dictate, the re-order simply follows what the films have already stated and/or suggested themselves. Rickie-d (talk) 21:54, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
The truth of the matter is that MCU and The Avengers are something that has never been really done before, and many aspects of the series simply don't fit into our pre-established notions of just what a film series is. We need to take this into consideration. Rickie-d (talk) 21:58, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Perhaps if we removed the characters who appear only twice from the table? It was initially meant to be a summarized version of the larger cast page, but if we do this we'll drop much of the Thor secondary cast and Christine Everhart, cleaning up the list. (The downside is that we'd also lose Bruce Banner, though, unless we made a special alteration for that.) It would bring the list from 23 down to 14 or 15. 16 if we list the Natalie Portman cameo in The Avengers. Rickie-d (talk) 22:10, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Reducing it to 16 allows the whole list to be shown on one screen, it looks like. Rickie-d (talk) 22:13, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Put it on my sandbox, if you could take a look. Still alphabetized for now, but reduced in size. Rickie-d (talk) 22:20, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
I like it. Drops War Machine and Happy, but seeing as they are Iron Man characters and not exactly MCU characters, that makes perfect sense. We keep Jasper Sitwell, oddly enough. Rickie-d (talk) 22:51, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Done. Thoughts? Rickie-d (talk) 23:12, 29 June 2012 (UTC)


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:43, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Thor 2

How is my phrasing of the sentence so different from the original phrasing ([1]) that WP:CRYSTAL comes into it? My change was to make the sentence less stilted and formal, because it sounded weird when compared with the other sentences. Both versions state the same thing, so if you're going to apply WP:CRYSTAL you should remove the entire sentence. Spidey104 15:02, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

It's hard to put emotion into digital words, so I didn't interpret the edit summary as being harsh. We don't always agree on things, but I've seen your edits enough to know you're a good editor and to trust your edits. That's why I went to your talk page instead of reverting your edit.
You're right. I'm wrong. I see the difference between intentions and what will happen. Spidey104 15:12, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Amazing Spider-Man

I and another editor asked for temporary semi-protection two days ago and got declined. I'm going to go bring the plot back to <700. Meanwhile, Maybe you could give the protection-request page a try? If enough different editors try, maybe it'll get through to them.--Tenebrae (talk) 19:56, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Well put! I have a good feeling your argument will convince them. Fingers crossed. --Tenebrae (talk) 20:23, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

TASM critic

Yeah Triiiple Threat. I was aiming for the New Yorker too due to being a top critic/Metacritic critic and having his own article. But I am not really sure what Tenebrae is really looking for? He still seems to be offline in the moment. Jhenderson 777 15:07, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

You could also weigh in your thoughts too. Jhenderson 777 15:08, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
You know what's funny. If I add the New Yorker one on the negative side then it would be obvious that the majority of New York critics didn't like the film. Jhenderson 777 16:53, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
Heh, I noticed that too, especially considering its a film about New York's arguably most famous superhero.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 17:00, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
J. Jonah Jameson paid them to do it. ;) Jhenderson 777 20:33, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Comic-Con images

We talked about this once. You said images with the certain license should be ok. But I got images like these and others shown them in Comic-con nominated for deletion while you have images like these as well. What's up with that? Jhenderson 777 18:41, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

You can also join the deletion request if you like. I am just guessing that he user assumes that they are screenshot which I am not sure he is correct on. Jhenderson 777 20:14, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
I added my two cents to the nomination page, however the issue isn't about Comic-Con, its about an image of an image that may or may not be copy-protected.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:03, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Captain America 2

But it has been announced and it even has it's own logo now.--Milomilk (talk) 21:14, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Iron Man in film

What happened to the idea to make Iron Man in film/Iron Man (film series) article? Jhenderson 777 18:53, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, I got sidetracked working on other stuff. I have rough draft of the layout in my sandbox. Don't mind the prose, its just filler for now. There is also a few references for use at the bottom of the page.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 18:58, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
If we are going to count animation. There should be a Hulk one too. Do you agree? Jhenderson 777 19:18, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Perhaps, I don't see why not.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 19:21, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Cap 2

There was a reason to my madness on Captain America: The Winter Soldier ;) Xpinkxcasualtyx (talk) 15:17, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

How? It's in development, it has it's own official logo. Marvel announced it at Comic Con. How does it still fail? Xpinkxcasualtyx (talk) 15:29, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Bah! Ok fine so when there are enough reliable sources and it can have its own page, can I undo your revision back to mine? Xpinkxcasualtyx (talk) 15:35, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Dude you're killing me! Lol ok ok fine. But I thought it was allowed if it was the official representation? But I guess it isn't if the page isn't official yet right? So can I use it when the page can go up? Xpinkxcasualtyx (talk) 16:25, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Oooh alright! I guess I'll have to deal with it...for now...;) Xpinkxcasualtyx (talk) 16:31, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Merging Symbiote related media

Hey T3, I know you edit comic articles but I don't think I've ever seen you edit Symbiote stuff. I just wanted to make you aware of an attempt I am making to create a single article for Symbiotes in media to deal with a couple of issues of redundancy and overlap across articles that ends up with a lot of incorrect or unverified info across articles, particularly Symbiote (comics) which draws from Venom (comics) which itself draws from Eddie Brock and Mac Gargan at least, plus Carnage (comics), Scream (comics), etc. Then you have issues where Eddie Brock's article is about Eddie Brock but features his appearances as Venom (since he never shows up alone as far as I am aware) and that the Symbiotes can switch hosts for an extended period quite often (since we now have Flash Venom). I thought a single article might be a good solution and make it much easier to monitor and maintain that information, and I have set up a page at User:Darkwarriorblake/Symbiote in other media to test it, but if you had any suggestions it would be appreciated, I'm struggling to think of the best way to manage the sectioning, could do it "Venom -> Live-action -> show", "Live-action-> Venom -> Show / Carnage -> show", "Live-action -> Show -> Carnage / Venom", etc where "/" is returning to the previous level. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 18:18, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks T3, and do you think it is an appropriate solution to merge those characters' media appearances? An alternative could be to just do Venom/Black suit in media since he is the worst offender and remove all the Venom mentions from the appropriate Venom-related articles, but in theory at least, the Symbiote unified one does seem like a good idea to me. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 19:45, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

DYK for The Wolverine (film)

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:03, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Man of Steel teasers

Did you see the teasers for this? Looks incredible.Rusted AutoParts 00:29, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Yes, it does, can't wait.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 18:05, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

The Avengers (film)

Hi! My redirect of The Avengers (film) to The Avengers (2012 film) was not based on its being the newest film, but rather it being the most well-known. It is already the third highest-grossing film ever, which is a pretty strong case in itself. The two other films mentioned on the disambigation film are (a) not even really called "The Avengers" and (b) a critically-panned box office bomb and 10-time Golden Raspberry nominee (winning one). So with the inclusion of the hat notice in the The Avengers (2012 film) article, I don't think it is unreasonable to redirect The Avengers (film) to The Avengers (2012 film). Jon Harald Søby (talk) 00:15, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank you

Just wanted to say thanks for the Peta Wilson talk page thing, I know youre just doing your job but I appreciate it :) Lady Lotus (talk) 20:38, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

No problem, we should always try to keep our focus on content not the contributor.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:45, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
I agree. Don't think the other guy does seeing as how he reverted your edit lol but I appreciate it nonetheless ;) xx Lady Lotus (talk) 00:25, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Renaming of section on talkpage of Peta Wilson

You should have a good reason for renaming a section on a talkpage. The name is neutral "Edit of ...". There is no Wikipedia guideline that gives you license to change the title I gave that section in this case. Debresser (talk) 00:49, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines#Editing_comments, that you should not change a section header unless the new name were better. As I explained in my revert of the first time you did it, the name you propose is less accurate. Debresser (talk) 00:51, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Thor 2 source

Saw this, reveals a filming location and the films working title possibly. Didn't want to add it as while it is a reliable source it does seem like it might be speculation even if its fairly obvious, so thought I would let you decide. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 19:49, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Yeah I saw that too, personally I think we should wait to see if anything more explicit turns up.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 19:55, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Fair enough. An aside, are you still opposed to a table like this in the Marvel Cinematic Universe article? Not exactly like, thats old, pics can be changes and things improved obviously. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 00:22, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
To me it just looks like the cast of the Avengers, and I don't think the images add that much. While we're at it, what's your opinion of this?--TriiipleThreat (talk) 16:03, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
Well it's kind of like the Thor article, just highlights the main players and adds some images to the article. As for the Johanson thing, if the Sun is the only source it's not off to a great start, but then it isn't even from a named source, just "a source". I probably would not include it or any source that can be traced back to the Sun article. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 16:27, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Are you working on a incubator article for Guardians of the Galaxy because this news has been released, so there is some development occurring there and an idea of the characters making it into the film. I'd be interested on collaborating on that film as I really like the comic, but I'm not interested in doing it solo, too much hassle on your own. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 00:52, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Nevermind, found it. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 00:58, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

ANother source, had some quotes, not sure if anything interests you for the Dark World article, I found "Underneath the steely cold veneer of his trickster charm is a certain vulnerability and sensitivity – the wounded fragility of an outcast brother and son" might be worth while adding. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 17:23, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

  • Hey T3, I was thinking the Development section of Marvel Cinematic Universe could use some subheaders to break up the info, at the moment I think two would probably be enough and you could use the studio defined arcs to decide where the break comes, so everything from Iron Man to the Avengers would be a section like "Avengers Assemble" (it can be more professional I just thought that was apt and catchy), and the second would be something like "Expanding the universe" or somehthing to refer to adding new characters, regaining others and going into the cosmic part of Marvel, which is hte second phase. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 00:08, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
And I don't know if it is worth mentioning the rights they have acquired since the opening of Marvel Studios. This source at THR mentions things like Blade, and I think the Deadline source I just added to the article mentions the Punisher. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 10:47, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
We will have to sub-divide the section at some point. I'm okay with dividing it by phases as well but maybe not until after the release of the fist couple of phase two films, when we can establish the universe connections through reliable sources. I'm also okay with mentioning the rights they have acquired. Just keep in mind with all of this, this isnt the Marvel Studios article. Its the MCU so everything needs to be framed on how its fits into the universe.--11:57, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Oh, there is a separate Marvel Studios article? Why did we add the Daredevil info to the MCU one? Was that someone else? Darkwarriorblake (talk) 12:04, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
It was someone else. I know we did include the Punisher info in the future section at one point.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 12:23, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Another day, another source here. Says the Avengers has sold 76 million tickets. It doesn't say that its a record, just says its more than even The Dark Knight. Don't know if you think that adding hte ticket numbers is worth adding. I think its notable in a sense since they were saying that the inflated 3D prices were pushing it up too but obviously just lots of people are going to see it as well. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 23:46, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, I missed this comment. I've got a headache dealing with a new editor. Anyway, it what way were you planning on using this source? Also regarding Thor 2's filming, I just saw this even though we can't us it as a WP:RS. And even though variety source says it is filming, I haven't seen anything official, like they did with Iron Man 3.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 14:46, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
Would have just added it to the box office section maybe, saying how many tickets it had sold. As for Thor, I can't remember where but I saw a letter earlier today about that saying a film called Thursday Mourning was being filmed and the company was Asgard Productions or something like that. It's obviously it, but no news source it spelling it out to make it easy for us. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 20:33, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
If you just want to state the number of tickets sold, I'd say its fine. I would not add it the the list of B.O. records though. Are you talking about the source that started this discussion? :) I'd say the set construction photos adds some validity to it but two semi-reliable sources, do not make a reliable source. Though if they are still constructing sets, filming might not be taking place when they claim. Looking back, Marvel had press releases for Iron Man 2, Thor, The Avengers and Iron Man 3, you would think they would do the same for Thor 2.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:45, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

The Wolverine

Sure. Later today. Hope all's well wit'cha. --Tenebrae (talk) 20:10, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Planning on getting back to this later tonight. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:52, 7 August 2012 (UTC)


You beat me to it! I just saw the Joss Whedon news at Nice work, yo! --Tenebrae (talk) 22:52, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, but I wasn't the first just cleaned up and verified.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 02:00, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
I'd love to, but I'm on deadline. Go for it! --Tenebrae (talk)

Man of Steel

Hey, would you mind taking a look at the Man of Steel article and adding/removing anything that could help bring it to the standard of other superhero-related articles such as The Avengers? Rusted AutoParts 20:49, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Creating new wikipedia articles for long running comic book titles

hey i was actually thinking that it would be good if we made articles for comic books like Iron Man, Captain America, Incredible Hulk, Thor, Daredevil, Ms.Marvel and some more.actually these comic books have included at least 3,4 volumes so it would be good to make these pages for good information .actually i am new i am feeling difficulty creating articles and i have found you very devoted to these comic book media so will you do the pleasure and make these pages.once u make then i will do my best to increase information.i know we have these characters pages but having pages for their comic books will be a really nice work like superman has his comic book page. so will you and if "yes" then when???? --Shoxee1214 (talk) 17:49, 13 August 2012 (UTC) Shoxee1214

Its common practice to merge content for characters with self titled series together since the information usually goes hand-in-hand. There are however a few notable exceptions. My advise would be to solicit wider consensus at WT:COMICS before creating any new articles, like the ones you have suggested. Hope this helps.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 18:08, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
But what about "Indestructible Hulk", "Thor God of Thunder", "All-New X-Men", "Uncanny Avengers" ???? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shoxee1214 (talkcontribs) 21:24, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
They have to meet WP:GNG.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:41, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Red dawn

What's an EL? And sorry i didn't mean to redo the cite, I didn't realize you had reverted it when I added the plot. My bad :) Lady Lotus (talk)

Sorry, its shorthand for external link.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:20, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Wow, what a brain fart, I probably could have guessed that if I thought hard enough lol Those citation things annoy me so I was just trying to get rid of it by adding the cite. Could I put it under the External links and remove the citation thing or no? Lady Lotus (talk)
It doesnt really work that way but seeing how the main cast is already cited in the production, I'll look the other way. However someone else could challenge it.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:46, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Marvel NOW!

Thanks for fixing my citation. I'm glad we could come to a consensus so quickly! Snakebyte42 (talk) 13:45, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Declined Review of Pages for Creation

hey hi i actually created articles for comic books of Thor and Incredible hulk and u declined there submission .ok but can u tell me what more content should i include in this article to be legal because this article is specifically for comic book not character so it would be really usefull .and u know there are many more articles of comic books . superman, batman,flash and many more have their character pages and comic book pages also.and also thor and hulk comic books are notable as they are running for 5 decades. so can u tell me how to improve my articles and submit ?? Regards --Shoxee1214 (talk) 08:29, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank You i really appreciate ur help. actually i want to help improve articles as much possible .so can u guide me how to write perfect things i would really appreciate that.Thanks and can i add titles information (bibliography) in their parent pages. Regards --Shoxee1214 (talk) 16:56, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

License Tag

hey i actually need your help. actually i want to ask which license tag should i put with images (during uploading) which are available all over the internet for promotion like images avilable on, etc. these websites upload pictures free and also these pictures can be downloaded by everyone across the world for free so which license tag should i put with these kind of images while uploading on wikipedia? --Shoxee1214 (talk) 08:28, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Marvel NOW!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:03, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Iron Man 3

What is wrong with you people? Why must you make Gwyneth Paltrow 2nd in the side bar? This is not Iron Man 2!Mark (talk) 20:52, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Ugh, see Talk:Iron Man 3#Gravitons POV/OR changes to the starring list.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:39, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Avengers vs. X-Men, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Brooks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:34, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Avengers VFX

I saw this and thought it might keep you or someone busy. Extensive breakdown of the VFC. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 22:37, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Alot of this is already covered pretty generally in the article, I dont we think we should get bogged down with technical minutiae.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 16:02, 7 September 2012 (UTC)


  • If there is a U.S. release date, why can't there be a U.S. gross?
  • Can we shorten the text on Ruffalo's pic? That's a lot to write in that little box.
  • I updated the worldwide gross, why is that reverted? I got it from the same ref as the one before it
  • Can I still center the 'year' and 'award' columns? since it's all that space, it looks nicer

p.s. - still convinced you just like reverting my edits ;) Lady Lotus (talk) 15:37, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

  • See Template:Infobox film
  • It might be alot but adds context to its inclusion in that particular section.
  • Sorry, it got lost in the revert.
  • Same here
Sorry, its nothing personal, I actually think you are becoming a valued contributor.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 15:47, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Aw thanks :) I'm trying, I know there's still a lot of guidelines and rules to remember and go by, I only try to change or update things for the better of the page. And thanks for redoing those edits :) xx Lady Lotus (talk) 15:55, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Hangover 3

Thanks for your patience with the Bartha interview thing today. I was at work and wanted to get the info up quickly but didn't have the time to properly format it, and I appreciate your effort in doing so. Cheers! --DarthBinky (talk) 21:11, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

No problem, thank you for adding a source.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:13, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Thor: The Dark World

well damn dude! ok so why isn't the daily mail link usable if it's already in the article? especially if it offers set pictures. j/w. Lady Lotus (talk)

See WP:ELRC, sites that are being used as references should not be duplicated as external links.--14:36, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Gotcha. P.S. - i REALLY did look to see if the avengers 2 was already in incubation but couldn't find it. not trying to be difficult :) Lady Lotus (talk)
No prob, and really neither am I, you're catching on quick though.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 14:44, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for The Hangover Part III

PanydThe muffin is not subtle 00:03, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Psylocke-20050603013519041.jpg)

  Thanks for uploading File:Psylocke-20050603013519041.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:11, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

A+X is an ongoing series

hey i wanted to tell u that a+x is an ongoing series not limited series u can check that on internet also u should google it i'd say. btw marvel also said that marvel now! will only include ongoing series no limited series so kindly include that a+x series in new series portion of marvel now! article.--Shoxee1214 (talk) 17:23, 18 September 2012 (UTC)


Trip, you know I respect you and your work, and changing the opening line of The Avengers (2012 film) after everything all of us went through for weeks to reach that wording doesn't seem like you. If you think it's worth reopening discussion on what had seemed a settled, admin-approved issue, I understand. Making this change unilaterally after a compromise was hammered out is different, though. Who knows? It may be a course to take at this point — but it really, really ought to be discussed. With regards, Tenebrae (talk) 21:06, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Like I said in my edit summary, I knew it was a bold edit, which you were free to revert. I just thought since the release of the UK Blu-ray, that this wording would be more neutral. I'm not opposed to the current wording so I won't challenge your revert nor do I wish start another debate over this topic. Although largely settle, I thought this new bit of information would help settle any remaining contentious attitudes before the article goes up for GA review after the release of the Blu-ray in the US. Sorry if I caused any further problems.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:18, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Naw, naw, no problem at all; are you kidding? You've done so much great work at WikiProject Comics I was actually embarrassed to bring it up!
The UK Blu-Ray is interesting, and I'd like to see what's onscreen, since the US poster also has just "Marvel" in a red box, but "Marvel's," with apostrophe, onscreen. And the original press screenings of the US version, which Disney called "Marvel's" all up and down the street, did not have the apostrophe-s, which was added prior to general release.--Tenebrae (talk) 22:42, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gina Carano, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Expendables (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for RED 2

Casliber (talk) 08:03, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Marvel Studios

Hey, there's a completely nonsensical argument over at the Marvel Studios page, can you help me resolve? There's a user who keeps reading what he wants to into articles from 5 years ago and saying that Paramount will distribute the Thor, Cap, and Avengers sequels, despite literally every source saying otherwise. Thanks. -Fandraltastic (talk) 17:12, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Thor 2 second unit

Looking into it it everything I can find seems to trace back to Unless you think a youtube video works as a source. I'll keep a look out. -Fandraltastic (talk) 21:44, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Can you give your opinion on a 3RR case about Marvel Studios?

Please see WP:AN3#User:Spshu reported by User:Sjones23 (Result: ). You seem to have some knowledge in this area, and you are not one of the combatants. Do you have any idea of how an admin ought to close this case? Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 19:42, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Marvel Studios#Request for comment

  You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Marvel Studios#Request for comment. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 17:11, 13 October 2012 (UTC)


WP:IMAGELOCATION (just to show I'm not making it up or anything ;) lol) Lady Lotus (talk) 20:46, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, it only applies the top left though, it might be better located elsewhere to avoid conflict with the infobox and other section headers. Besides its not pertinent to career section.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:04, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Right, the top left of a section or subsection, which is where it was, so I moved it, aren't we saying the same thing? :P Doesn't matter to me where it moves to, just trying to follow guidelines, like a good little editor :) Lady Lotus (talk) 21:21, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Iron Man 3 Miami beach filming

Hey, I found this [2] pdf straight from the Miami Beach Gov't, with filming dates on the location. The link automatically downloads the file instead of bringing it up in a window. Do you think it's fine to use is as a source anyway? (You can view the pdf here without downloading.) Thanks. -Fandraltastic (talk) 00:41, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Gov't source? You can't get much better than that.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 09:02, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Yeah but a pdf that auto-downloads? Would have thought that'd be an issue -Fandraltastic (talk) 15:03, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
I don't think its a problem, you can always make a note of it in your citation. Besides offline sources are acceptable. You might want to ask the appropriate help page and see what they think.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 15:09, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Kenneth Branagh

Hello TriiipleThreat,

I have received your message re: my revisions. I am unsure why my revision on the Kenneth Branagh article resulted in accusations of an edit war - I provided valid and factual references stating that Mr. Branagh is Irish. As a citizen of Northern Ireland, Mr. Branagh is an Irish citizen by birth, as well as a British citizen, and can identity with either, or both, as per the Belfast Agreement. He has stated in the sources provided he identifies as being Irish, and feels Irish, as opposed to British. The genetleman un-doing the valid contribution that I made is perhaps the one you might like to contact regarding an Edit War, as it is he who is invalidly removing the information.

All the best. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 18:50, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

You haven't provided any source that suggests he's an Irish citizen (i.e. of the Republic), only that he "feels", to an extent, ethnically Irish and not English, which no-one would expect him to anyway. The facts as they stand are that he is a British citizen, with a knighthood, from Northern Ireland, and the article currently reflects that. You are welcome to discuss on that article's talk page, but it might be worth reading through the prior discussions first. At any rate, edit-warring isn't acceptable behaviour. Jon C. 08:12, 25 October 2012 (UTC)


Whatever changes you and the other editor were making were so subtle, I'm not sure I saw them!   :- )   I did catch an issue with a Jackman quote that wasn't a Jackman quote, and did a little touchup for flow. Hope it reads OK. And I hope if you're one of the Hurricane Sandy affected area that you've literally weathered the storm. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:50, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marvel NOW!, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Broo and Wolverine and the X-Men (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 31 October 2012 (UTC)


Hello. I was referring to the ComicBookResources page linked to by that very first paragraph that I changed. It says that "Special series will also play a role in the launch of Marvel NOW!", and then gives A+X as an example. [3]: Are you OK if I put it back?

By the way, the other source that paragraph quotes, [4], doesn't seem to mention A+X at all! I'm not sure how that got there! Morwen - Talk 13:56, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

That's an unedited live transcript of a panel! I think we'd need a better source than that. How about we take out whether or not it is an ongoing or limited series at all, until we get a good source either way? Oddly, I can't find the book in the October 2012 solicits (#2 appears in the November 2012 solicits). Morwen - Talk 14:07, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
That's a fair point, but look at [5] for how it handles something that is very definitely a limited series: they even have (wrongly) "2011 - present". And even if it's a limited series, it's definitely a monthly one, that's not in dispute. Possibly they are leaving it deliberately ambiguous? I suppose we could just ask Tom Brevoort on his formspring, we could cite that. Morwen - Talk 14:31, 2 November 2012 (UTC)


Oh so now I can't even attempt to discuss something with you because that's uncivil? --Allthestrongbowintheworld (talk) 15:25, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

The manner in which you choose to address me was uncivil. But to your point, your edit was reverted because you feel eight weeks is a brief period of time. That is a matter of opinion and constitutes original research. Just state the facts, without any editorializing.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 16:57, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
How exactly was it uncivil? Because I called you anal? That's not an insult or anything. It means someone who rigidly strict adherence to detail and rules. As for the matter at hand, Wikipedia is choc-a-bloc with things like these, because they are accurate descriptions that the vast vast vast majority of people do not have a problem with. It's hardly original research and it certainly isn't editorialising. --Allthestrongbowintheworld (talk) 18:04, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
Just because other articles are incorrect doesn't mean we need to degrade this one.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 19:59, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
Adding the word brief is degrading? If you say so. --Allthestrongbowintheworld (talk) 21:08, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Green Arrow

Read the Talk page for a link to the Peer Review.... Add your comments there please and thank you. Wjmummert (KA-BOOOOM!!!!) 18:23, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Ant-Man Need Help?

Hi, I saw that you have been working on a draft of Ant-Man at Wikipedia:Article_Incubator/Ant-Man_(film). Disney is a client of my employer, so while I don't edit Disney-related Wikipedia articles, I would be happy to help track down any sources that would be helpful to you. Is there anything specific you need or could use help with in order to turn that draft into a live article? --Jbettigo (talk) 22:23, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Wow, thanks for the offer. There haven't been very many details released so far, so anything you have will do. The only thing is that everything must be verified, so I can't just take your word for it. It has to be published by a reliable source.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 22:59, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for getting back to me. I definitely understand that you mean by providing reliable sources. Since I work on Disney properties, I'm very familiar with the reliable sources for Ant-Man and it seems like you have this page well cited. I'm just curious about what you think this page might need before it can go live. Is it still too early? Jbettigo (talk) 20:52, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Its too early with what we have. Either the film needs to start principal photography or we obtain an over-abundance of reliable sources, before the article can be created.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:21, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marvel NOW!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magik (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Decorative images

Hey. TT -- I've gone through some of these edits, and most of those images no longer appear to be in the articles. In the course of this I ran across some new articles for Marvel Now titles that, let's say, need some work to each encyclopedic standards. A ton of in-universe fancruft and over writing — I have to say, it galls me when people try to use Wikipedia as free-server fansites and don't respect it as an encyclopedia. Thank goodness for stalwarts like yourself, Nightscream, JGreb, Darkwarriorblake and others working to keep WIkiProject Comics up to standard. Keep me posted. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:58, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Marvel NOW! relaunched series

hey look no offence and i'm not going to old table format thing. i want to ask as you know you have put titles like avengers,new avengers,secret avengers in both cancelled and new sections in marvel now! article. i mean they are appearing for 2 times in table. dont you think we should somehow write these only once. i mean relaunched series section could be created in table containing only those titles which are restarting again . so what do you think?? and do beleive i'm not going to same old thing. i just had this idea so i wanted to discuss it with you . --Shoxee1214 (talk) 21:51, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Perhaps we could just get rid of the cancelled series section all together, and leave only the "New", "Other" and "One-shot" sections.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 22:27, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
well actually i was thinking that as too man titles are in both new and cancelled section we should create separate section for only relaunched . in this way one section can show two meanings that the title are cancelled and relaunched again . it will be space effective. --Shoxee1214 (talk) 13:39, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
The only titles we have listed as being cancelled are being relaunched, so that would be most of them. Besides its bit of WP:SYNTH since none of the references actually state they are being cancelled due to Marvel NOW!, we only assume so since they are coming back with #1 issues. So we might as well get rid of the entire lot.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:44, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
ok as you think is good. but do refine a table a bit because i was seeing a DC new 52 table,they have edited a lot to give a good look. and as you know marvel now! just does not count first issue ,but we are only listing a first issue in table. format should tell us that how many issue are included of each series. --Shoxee1214 (talk) 14:11, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
and by the way as you are saying that cancelled series are not worth incuding then what should we do about bundle of articles which have listed cancelled series like Dark reign,civil war,heroic age, etc etc. --Shoxee1214 (talk) 14:13, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
and hey what do you say about this design . this is showing a title only one time while also showing its relaunched and cancelled information. we can bold a new info if we want to. but you also think about a some new design about these relaunched series thing
I think that muddies up the information we're trying to present so like I said I think we should either leave it as is or get rid of cancelled information. Also you have a sandbox for test edits.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 15:02, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fearless Defenders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Brooks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:39, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Some bubble tea for you!

  Thanks for reviewing Dredd! Darkwarriorblake (talk) 21:37, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
Quick question, why is /Film not an acceptable source? Either way is comicbookresources better? It's the only one so far I have found mentioning Jock's involvement at that time. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 04:00, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the tea. I wouldn't say /Film is unacceptable but more weakly reliable. It's a blog but there does seem to be at least some editorial oversight. One or two of these might be okay for a GA depending on the circumstances but should be replaced for FA. CBR on the other hand is a highly respected website within the comic book industry.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 04:13, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
K, thanks T3. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 04:28, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Opinion request.

Hi there. Can you jump in and provide your opinion on this? Thanks! --uKER (talk) 20:45, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Neutral notice

There is a discussion involving WikiProject Comics at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Grand Comics Database that may be of interest to you. --Tenebrae (talk) 01:49, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Avengers article

I was just wondering as to why you undid my edit of removing the link to Maximiliano Hernandez? I removed the link because the page it links to does not exist, there is no point linking the name if there is no article there. I'm not gunna get into an edit-war about this but until a page for the actor is created there is no need for the link. Thanks. – Blue☆Stars83 22:01, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Please read WP:RED.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 22:41, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
Okay that's fine, but do you know when the page shall be created? I just feel having a link to a non-existent article for a while seems a little unnecessary. Sorry about the undoings from before. – Blue☆Stars83 22:52, 22 November 2012 (UTC)


Hello, TriiipleThreat. You have new messages at Talk:The Hobbit (film series).
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

De728631 (talk) 17:10, 26 November 2012 (UTC)


Hello, TriiipleThreat. You have new messages at Talk:The Hobbit (film series)#Latest position.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--2nyte (talk) 18:51, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Agent Sum.jpg)

  Thanks for uploading File:Agent Sum.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:17, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Daredevil vol. 3 & Uncanny X-Force vol. 1

hey you once said that those titles deserve a separate title which are worthy of recognition. thing is that every issue of daredevil vol. 3 (written by Mark Waid) and uncanny X-Force vol. 1 (written by Rick Remender) is universally acclaimed so don't you thin there separate articles should be created? if yes, then can you help in creating these because you are good in this thing?? --Shoxee1214 (talk) 13:24, 30 November 2012 (UTC) and yes Age of ultron has years in the making and nw its officially been announced for march 2013. so can you create also a article for this . thanks.

Hawkeye vol. 4

hey hi. as usual i need your help buddy. actually i saw that a critically acclaimed series of matt fraction and david aja called immortal iron fist has its own separate aeticle. that is why i want to ask can you create a separate article for hawkeye vol. 4 written by matt fraction and david aja. its been universally acclaimed since its release and also same is true for Captain marvel vol. 6 written by kelly sue deconnick. can you create their separate articles. ?? --Shoxee1214 (talk) 21:25, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

I do not yet believe those volumes meet general notability guidelines, perhaps sometime in future but not now. The same thing goes for Daredevil vol. 3 & Uncanny X-Force vol. 1.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:02, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Jack the Giant Slayer.jpg

Done. Please tell me when you've resolved the issue, so that I can undelete the image. Nyttend (talk) 13:26, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

I figured that it was just a caching issue, so I purged the cache and viewed it in a browser that I'd not previously used to view it, but the wrong image still persisted. Accordingly, I've redirected the old title to the new one; is that okay? Nyttend (talk) 14:12, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
Sorry about not getting to that sooner; I've deleted the new upload that you requested. While I was out of the house for a few hours, I got six messages from four different users, so I missed your comments entirely. Nyttend (talk) 22:13, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

  The Original Barnstar
Thanks for your work getting the Avengers up to Good Article status, and for your work on Marvel movies generally. Khazar2 (talk) 18:37, 12 December 2012 (UTC)


Wow ... two in one day. I better stop doing what I'm doing or I'll get a reputation!   : )   You're very thoughtful, TriiipleT ... thanks! --Tenebrae (talk) 21:10, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for the barnstar. --Boycool † (talk) 13:02, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Avengers Arena

Hi, I started adding the plot to Avengers Arena, but you removed it entirely because it was "way too long". why would you remove the entire thing, that just summarizes the first issue, and not just shortenining it to be more appropriate? — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 13:47, 13 December 2012 (UTC) can you define "too long"? and why not just shorten it yourself? no one else is writing the plot right now — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 19:29, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Publication history

I'm inviting you to discuss this issue at the WikiProject Comics talk page. (talk) 13:27, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Avengers Incorrection

Why did you re-add {{sic}} here? While the use of commas to join sentences is questionable, "It's clamorous" (i.e. it is loud) is neither ungrammatical, nor unexpected, nor a typo.

chocolateboy (talk) 23:32, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Actually I didn't even notice that I was reverting the lead edit.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 01:03, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

A brownie for you!

  Merry Christmas Threatx3 Darkwarriorblake (talk) 03:35, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

World War Z

Friend, you can answer me to "talk" to the movie "World War Z" because i wanted to change the nationality, as the movie is not British, please await your response, I would start a consensus.

participe please, because you are who created the article.

World War Z (film)

Hello, there is currently a discussion a user has set up regarding the nationality of the film on the article talk page. Seeing as you reverted his edit before I could, thought it would be a discussion you would be interested in taking part in. Happy Holidays. MisterShiney 00:14, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

It would seem the sock puppets are out in full force on the said talk page. Two IP users with few previous edits "just happen along" MisterShiney 00:45, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

I wish more people participate. MervinVillarreal (talk) 01:08, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "TriiipleThreat/Archive 4".