User talk:Titoxd/Archive26
Welcome to my Talk Page! DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE. This archive page covers approximately the dates between March 9 2008 and June 21 2008. Post replies to the main talk page, copying or summarizing the section you are replying to if necessary. Please add new archivals to User talk:Titoxd/Archive34. (See Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page.) Thank you. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 10:01, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Peer reviewI saw your name listed on Wikipedia:Peer review/volunteers so I really wanted to contact you. Currently, I am reqesting that Aang be peer reviewed, and I would really appreciate it if you left some comments about the article. Thanks a lot! Parent5446(Murder me for my actions) 20:15, 9 March 2008 (UTC) Late reply to a Village pump threadI added some late information about the {{Google custom}} template to: Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 19#Namespaces as subdomains. You were active in that thread, so I thought you might like to know. I did not see the question when it was fresh; another user called my attention to it later. --Teratornis (talk) 20:57, 9 March 2008 (UTC) Requesting peer review of FacebookI noticed that you listed yourself as a volunteer for "Applied sciences and technology" subjects for peer review. I am requesting a peer review from you for Wikipedia:Peer review/Facebook/archive2, if you have the time. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 18:37, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Titoxd. I am going to nominate the Oil shale and Oil shale extraction articles for FAC. As the last peer reviews of these articles were not very productive, I wonder if you agree to take a look and give some advice and hard critics before proceeding with the FAC nomination? Thank you in advance. Beagel (talk) 19:47, 15 March 2008 (UTC) Peer review ideaHi, I have made a proposal that no peer review request be archived without some response. To aid in this, there is a new list of PR requests at least one week old that have had no repsonses beyond a semi-automated peer review. This list is at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog. There are just over 100 names on the PR volunteers page, so I figure if each of these volunteers reviewed just one or two PR requests without a response from the list each month, it would easily take care of the "no response" backlog (as there have been 2 or 3 such unanswered requests a day on average). If you would be able to help out with a review or two a month from the "no responses" backlog list that would be great (and much appreciated). Please discuss questions, comments, or ideas at the PR talk page and thanks in advance for your help, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 23:59, 15 March 2008 (UTC) Requesting peer review of PHPI noticed that you listed yourself as a volunteer for "Applied sciences and technology" subjects for peer review. I am requesting a peer review from you for Wikipedia:Peer review/PHP/archive2, if you have the time. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 21:11, 16 March 2008 (UTC) RFA thanks
Peer Review RequestedHello. Would you please peer review Tropical Storm Charley (1998)?TheNobleSith (talk) 23:05, 21 March 2008 (UTC) Peer review/copy editHi there. Degrassi: The Next Generation is currently being Peer Reviewed here, and I was wondering if you would be able to give it a copy edit before I take it to WP:FAC. Any help, big or small would be appreciated. Thank you -- Matthew 20:11, 24 March 2008 (UTC) P.S. I love what you did at the blogpage. That's actually how I edit Wikipedia - by printing the article, putting pen to paper, and then typing it up! WikiProject Council roll callHi there. You are receiveing this message because your name appears on the WikiProject Council participants list. The WikiProject Council is currently having a roll-call; if you are still interested in participating in the inter-project discussion forum that WT:COUNCIL has become, or you are interested in continuing to develop and maintain the WikiProject Guide or Directory, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Participants and remove the asterisk (*) from your name on the list of participants. If you are no longer interested in the Council, you need take no action: your name will be removed from the participants list on April 30 2008. AangI saw your name on the PR volunteer list, so I decided to come to you. The Aang article was kept from FA status mainly for one reason: prose. I would really appreciate it if you could look over the article and provide some comments on the prose or maybe even copyedit it yourself. Thanks. — Parent5446 (t n c e m l) 21:20, 25 March 2008 (UTC) ja.wpYes, that was me. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 20:44, 27 March 2008 (UTC) Egads the Cross Nominating!Hi Titoxd, glad to see everyone so cheery today but be careful with cross nominating pages at MFD. I had to remove some of them because it was spawning the deletion tag all over the place. And Happy April Fools you joker :P...¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 21:53, 1 April 2008 (UTC) First Edit Day!
Happy First Edit Day
Idontknow610TM 19:15, 2 April 2008 (UTC) Awarding Barnstar
Peer review assistance requestedI started a peer review at WikiProject video games for The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time. If you could copyedit it or put in any other suggestions, I'd appreciate it: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Video_games/Peer_review#The_Legend_of_Zelda:_Ocarina_of_Time. Thanks! Voyaging(talk) 01:36, 3 April 2008 (UTC) Hi, I fixed your concern about the images in Weather front. Is there anything else you think needs to be done? Thanks, Juliancolton The storm still blows... 19:42, 4 April 2008 (UTC) Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #15The Hurricane Herald This is the monthly newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The Hurricane Herald aims to give a summary, both of the activities of the WikiProject and global tropical cyclone activity. If you wish to change how you receive this newsletter, or no longer wish to receive it, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. This newsletter covers all of March 2008. Please visit this page and bookmark any suggestions of interest to you. This will help improve monitoring of the WikiProject's articles. Storm of the month  Cyclone Jokwe was the first tropical cyclone to make landfall in Mozambique since Cyclone Favio struck in the previous year. The tenth named storm of the 2007-08 South-West Indian Ocean cyclone season, Jokwe was first classified as a tropical depression on March 2 over the open Southwest Indian Ocean. It tracked west-southwest, crossing northern Madagascar as a tropical storm on March 5 before intensifying into a tropical cyclone on March 6. Jokwe rapidly intensified to reach peak winds of 195 km/h (120 mph), before weakening slightly and striking Nampula Province in northeastern Mozambique. It quickly weakened while paralleling the coastline, though the storm restrengthened as it turned southward in the Mozambique Channel. Late in its duration, it remained nearly stationary for several days, and steadily weakened due to wind shear before dissipating on March 16. The storm caused minor damage in northern Madagascar. In Mozambique, the cyclone affected 165,000 people, and left at least sixteen fatalities. Cyclone Jokwe destroyed over 9,000 houses and damaged over 3,000 more, with the heaviest damage in Angoche and the Island of Mozambique in Nampula Province. The storm also caused widespread power outages and crop damages. Other tropical cyclone activity
Member of the month  The March member of the month is CapeVerdeWave, whose first edit was to a tropical cyclone article, back in January 2006. CapeVerdeWave has been a steady and active member of the project, writing several articles on Category 5 hurricanes as well as working on the often forgotten older hurricanes. The user also has contributed to some older season articles, and recently helped update the project after the recent hurricane re-analysis. We thank him for his continued dedication. New members New and improved articles
Main Page content
Storm article statistics
Project News: Updates on the Best Track - Atlantic and North Indian Ocean, and more According to an email sent to the India Meteorological Department, there will be an online version of the North Indian Ocean best track from 1877 to 2006, scheduled to be released in two months; it is unknown if it will cost money to access. In unrelated news, the project was featured on the Signpost; Mitchazenia was interviewed, and talked about the past, present, and future of the project. At the end of the month, there were five different Featured content candidates (FXC's) by five different editors; two were featured article candidates, two were featured list candidates, and one was a featured picture candidate. The have been a few times in which there were four FXC's from four different editors, most recently in February and early March of 2008. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:38, 6 April 2008 (UTC) I've been working on the Tropical cyclone WikiProject for almost four years now and I know that at times it can be pretty draining. Hurricanehink and I started a fun little thing two years ago called the Hurricane Hall of Fame (based on a concept I'd created much earlier). It works just like any other Hall of Fame: every year, five storms are voted in based on notability. Up until now, the voters were just me and Hink and the honorees were just Atlantic storms. Both of those are changing (hopefully). I'm trying to get more Project members involved in the voting and I'm going international this year. This ballot is for the Eastern Pacific. Following this election, I'll send out ballots for the Western Pacific and then perhaps the Indian Ocean...all leading up to the Atlantic ballot early this summer. I'd really appreciate your participation. It's just for fun; something to lower stress levels. I'll announce the winners next weekend. The nominees are...
-- §HurricaneERICarchive 01:54, 14 April 2008 (UTC) Category:No-Category Version 0.7 articlesHi Titoxd. I found Category:Uncategorized Version 0.7 articles. Is there still a need for Category:No-Category Version 0.7 articles (which you created)? If not, please post {{db-catempty}} on the top of the page. Thanks. GregManninLB (talk) 00:51, 19 April 2008 (UTC) Requesting copy-editing for Dredg articleHi. You were listed as a general copy-editor on the peer review volunteer page. Your volunteer comment said that you were an ESL reader. Dredg has many fans outside of English speaking countries, and I would like for the article to be easy for them to follow. I would greatly appreciate if you could assist with the Dredg peer review. Thank you. --Ars Sycro (talk) 02:11, 28 April 2008 (UTC) Hi Titoxd (Re: Withdraw AfD nomination for Audiocom article)How are you? I need your help here. I want to withdraw my nomination to delete Audiocom article. Can you help me out. Thanks in advance. Jrod2 (talk) 08:52, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Deleted PageA page I created was deleted today Jameel williams. Could you please send me a copy of it at andresandres444@yahoo.com ? Thanks Headphones2413 (talk) 01:57, 29 April 2008 (UTC) Hi, you peer reviewed Facebook a few weeks ago. If you have time, could you please take a second look at the article as it is now and post some comments at the peer review? Please let us know if the comments you posted last time have been addressed or not. I would like to bring the article to FAC soon, so any copyediting help would also be greatly appreciated. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 00:05, 4 May 2008 (UTC) Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #16The Hurricane Herald This is the monthly newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The Hurricane Herald aims to give a summary, both of the activities of the WikiProject and global tropical cyclone activity. If you wish to change how you receive this newsletter, or no longer wish to receive it, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. This newsletter covers all of April 2008. Please visit this page and bookmark any suggestions of interest to you. This will help improve monitoring of the WikiProject's articles. Storm of the month  Typhoon Neoguri was the earliest tropical cyclone on record to strike China. It formed on April 13 to the east of the Philippines, and once entering the South China Sea, environmental conditions allowed for quick strengthening. Neoguri attained its peak intensity of 150 km/h (90 mph) as it approached the island of Hainan, though rapidly weakened due to unfavorable conditions. The system made landfall in southern China on April 19, causing three deaths and moderate damage totaling over ¥296 million (2008 RMB, $42 million 2008 USD). The typhoon left 40 fishermen missing in the South China Sea. Other tropical cyclone activity
Member of the month The April member of the month is VOFFA. Though not officially a project member, VOFFA is an important user to the project, having maintained and updated the talk page archives on tropical cyclones worldwide; activity includes adding warnings and discussions for all storms. The user is particularly active during the off-season of the Atlantic basin, when article activity on tropical cyclones typically declines. New members New and improved articles
Main Page content
Storm article statistics
Project News A Wikipedia traffic counter was launched earlier this year. In the month of February, the article on Hurricane Katrina was viewed just over 200,000 times, making the article the 496th most viewed article on the English Wikipedia during the month. During the month, Hurricane Camille was demoted from GA status, continuing the trend of good articles degrading in status on notable storms; other occurrences include the FA removal of Cyclone Tracy and 1900 Galveston Hurricane. If anyone has any ideas how to fix the problem, feedback and ideas are appreciated. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:50, 4 May 2008 (UTC) Re: GeorgesYea, I know there was an A-class assessment, but that appears to be a while ago before our standards were as high as they are now. For one thing, there's no aftermath and there's that trivia-like section, which is against the MoS. If you believe it should be A-class still, by all means go back and change it. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 13:29, 5 May 2008 (UTC) Do you think this article is of low importance? The main article 2003 Atlantic hurricane season is rated mid-importance. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 07:54, 11 May 2008 (UTC) Speedy deletion of ؟؟ЯƎออAHSorry about that,just tagged the page as speedy. Sorry again! - `Amog |Talk 08:28, 12 May 2008 (UTC) Keeping it togetherThis discussion is effectively closed, but this and this discussions at the Pump and this discussion at the Assessment talk needs to happen at the same place. I completely agree to you on that. Is it just possible to close the proposal page discussion and put the arguments (there are a few) on the other discussion, possibly in a collapsible format? Will it be disruptive or something? I hope not, as it will put all the eggs in the same basket ready to be sorted. No? Aditya(talk • contribs) 14:10, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Rfb participation thanksHello, Titoxd. I wanted to personally thank you for taking part in the project-wide discussions regarding my candidacy for bureaucratship. After bureaucratic discussion, the bureaucrats decided that there was sufficient significant and varied opposition to my candidacy, and thus no consensus to promote. Although personally disappointed, I both understand and respect their decision, especially in light of historical conservatism the project has had when selecting its bureaucrats. If you have any further suggestions or comments as to how you think I could help the project, please let me know. Once again, thank you for your support. -- Avi (talk) 18:31, 12 May 2008 (UTC) ArchiveI created an archive for your talk page as you haven't archived it in such a long time (11 months). Weatherlover819 (talk) 10:40, 13 May 2008 (UTC) Jet streamLet me know if I haven't fulfilled the comments you made for GA. I searched for a couple hours regarding ENSO connection to the jet stream, and nearly all references concerned North America. I did find a couple that mentioned Europe and South America, and the limited information found was added into the article. Thegreatdr (talk) 15:23, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
RfA thanks!
Greetings!I saw you over at WP:AN, and wanted to stop by and say hello! Nice to see you around - I hope all is well. -- Natalya 15:06, 19 May 2008 (UTC) May 19 DispatchMentions the assessment poll: Wikipedia:FCDW/May 19, 2008. Best regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:38, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi, just dropping in to echo SandyG's encouragement, and also to say that I've watchlisted that redlink and am ready to help out as soon as you can put some content up. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 04:44, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Soft redirects on Country ProjectsTitoxd, do you have any idea what is behind this? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:07, 20 May 2008 (UTC) Errant templates - could you edit them?You mentioned that templates could be edited to allow both |A and |class=A to be accepted. Would you please make such edits to Template:WikiProject Arthropods, Template:WikiProject Spiders and Template:WikiProject Lepidoptera? I presume you know how to do so. If not, I can ask at the template requests. Richard001 (talk) 00:11, 24 May 2008 (UTC) Request for Peer Review helpThank you for you work as a peer review volunteer. Since March, there has been a concerted effort to make sure all peer review requests get some response. Requests that have gone three days or longer without a substantial response are listed at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog. I have three requests to help this continue. 1) If you are asked to do a peer review, please ask the person who made the request to also do a review, preferably of a request that has not yet had feedback. This is fairly simple, but helps. For example when I review requests on the backlog list, I close with Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, ... 2) While there are several people who help with the backlog, lately I have been doing up to 3 or 4 peer reviews a day and can not keep this up much longer. We need help. Since there are now well over 100 names on the PR volunteers page, if each volunteer reviewed just one PR request without a response from the list each month, it would easily take care of the "no response" backlog. To help spread out the load, I suggest those willing pick a day of the month and do a review that day (for example, my first edit was on the 8th, so I could pick the 8th). Please pick a peer review request with no responses yet, if possible off the backlog list. If you want, leave a note on my talk page as to which day you picked and I will remind you each month. 3) I have made some proposals to add some limits to peer review requests at Wikipedia_talk:Peer_review#Proposed_limits. The idea is to prevent any one user from overly burdening the process. These seem fairly reasonable (one PR request per editor per day, only four total PR requests per editor at a time, PR requests with cleanup banners can be delisted (like GAN quick fail), and wait two weeks to relist a PR request after it is archived), but have gotten no feedback in one week. If you have any thoughts on these, please weigh in. Thanks again for your help and in advance for any assistance with the backlog. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 20:57, 27 May 2008 (UTC) Your help please...You concluded the {{afd}} for Ralph Kohlmann. Could you please userify this page, its full history, and the full history of its talk page to User:Geo Swan/Review/Ralph Kohlmann and User talk:Geo Swan/Review/Ralph Kohlmann. I'd like to see if there is anything in the article that merits merging into Ralph H Kohlmann. Thanks! Geo Swan (talk) 23:49, 29 May 2008 (UTC) The toolThanks for taking the time to notify me. Unfortunately, v5.20 does not work for me. It no longer crashes as we saw in v5.0 and v5.1, however when I put in a name and click "proceed", as soon as it communicates with Wikipedia a modal dialogue pops up that says 'buggy - please download current version' and hangs (doesn't appear to ever download anything). If you're interested or need more info please let me know. Thanks again! /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 11:59, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Dispatch for June 14?Hi. It seems that there was a bit of a miscommunication regarding the previous dispatch on changing the assessment scheme. Do you think you guys can commit to writing a draft for June 14? Please comment and watchlist here. Many thanks. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 01:30, 1 June 2008 (UTC) Your documentation requestHi there - noticed a request for documentation on the Village Pump page for FritzpollBot. I have actually covered this vaguely in the section I added when I noticed this page about an hour ago. I will happily provide documentation - how comprehensive do you want it to be (say, compared to what I have written) Fritzpoll (talk) 11:45, 1 June 2008 (UTC) C-Class discussionI saw your announcement at WP:AN and visited the polling page. As I know nothing about the subject, I immediately looked for and expected there to be a link in the polling header text to where the template is described, discussed, etc. but there is none. The template is not self-explanatory and, in fact, indicates it's deprecated. What I'm saying is, shouldn't there be (isn't there?) somewhere to link to in the poll text that gives some background for those not already familiar with the subject? Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:26, 4 June 2008 (UTC) Tropical cyclogenesis GA Sweeps Review: On HoldAs part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria and I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I have reviewed Tropical cyclogenesis and believe the article currently meets the majority of the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, and I'll leave the article on hold for seven days for them to be fixed. I have left this message on your talk page since you have significantly edited the article (based on using this article history tool). Please consider helping address the several points that I listed on the talk page of the article, which shouldn't take too long to fix with the assistance of multiple editors. I have also left messages on the talk pages for other editors and a related WikiProject to spread the workload around some. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 01:23, 8 June 2008 (UTC) Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #17{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Newsletter/Archive 17}} ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:42, 8 June 2008 (UTC) DispatchesTito, Do you want to write this up for this coming week (see my talk page) - or for the week after? It depends whether you want to have it written up to publicise the poll, or to announce the result. I'd prefer the latter, but if you strongly prefer the former, you'd better write it up now. I have very limited internet (public libraries), but I'll try to vcheck tomorrow. Walkerma. DispatchHi there: how's it going for 16 June? Wikipedia_talk:Featured_content_dispatch_workshop#June_16 TONY (talk) 15:33, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Tito, I also left this note for Walkerma ... we're past publication date, and there are still three inline comments that should urgently be addressed (search on <!) ... the description of C-class is missing, we need better examples, and the description of B-class is inconsistent with info in the Grading scheme relative to C-class. Readers who are unaware of and uninvolved with assessment need a clear idea of what B and C are. Best, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:47, 21 June 2008 (UTC) Effects of Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans GA Sweeps Review: On HoldAs part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria and I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I have reviewed Effects of Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans and believe the article currently meets the majority of the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, and I'll leave the article on hold for seven days for them to be fixed. I have left this message on your talk page since you have significantly edited the article (based on using this article history tool). Please consider helping address the several points that I listed on the talk page of the article, which shouldn't take too long to fix with the assistance of multiple editors. I have also left messages on the talk pages for other editors and related WikiProjects to spread the workload around some. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 21:07, 12 June 2008 (UTC) C-ClassC-Class is coming to a project near you! Your proposal did seem to get enough support to indicate a consensus. I think some of the objections can in fact be handled by improving the system at the same time as we make the changes. I've updated Wikipedia:FCDW/June 16, 2008, and this was also revamped a couple of nights ago, can you check it over before it goes to press? As I see it, there are three main things that need to be done at this point to introduce C-Class.
I'm happy for you to take charge of 1 and 3, while I focus on getting #2 organized - would that be acceptable to you? Thanks a lot for making a strong case for change! Walkerma (talk) 04:26, 19 June 2008 (UTC) C-Class sort keysI have added sort keys for the bot-created C-Class categories. I have updated the plugin too. Regards, Ganeshk (talk) 05:49, 21 June 2008 (UTC) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
