FGB edit

Huh. Wasn't aware that people not logged in couldn't propose deletions (doesn't appear anywhere on WP:PROD. Oh well.)

I still believe it should be deleted, by WP:N. Since you want to contest it I'll stick it through the AfD process rather than proposing a straight delete. Greg Tyler (tc) 17:27, 31 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your threat against an IP edit

I found this message you left to this IP quite ridiculous! Correct me if I am wrong but I can't find anywhere where is says "IP's shall not propose articles for deletion" in WP:PROD. Also, it was a legitimate reason for deletion therefore it wasn't a troll action. In the future please do not harass other users by making threats such as "you will be blocked" especially to IP's. JayJayWhat did I do? 17:47, 31 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

I also noticed that the information in the article about the series might be false, because I didn't know much about it except for the fact that they review fictional gals and give 'em scores. I can only imagine Lance Biggums himself finding out about my recent attempt at creating a Wikipedia article on their show, and a reaction "episode" would be uploaded to FineGameGirls subsequently. User:TheIsraeliSudrian (talk) 08:17, 1 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

This place sure is A Whole Lot Better edit

Why the hell does the Hebrew version have this stupid law called "Encyclopedic Importance/Significance"?! I wish they had those epic articles you have here, like articles from the worlds of Gaming and Cosplay for example. When I attempted to create Jessica Nigri one time, her article was not only horribly written, but there was even a discussion about her "Importance" and an AFD vote which resulted in a deletion. BOO "ENCYCLOPEDIC IMPORTANCE"!! I also remember when someone attempted to create a page for Terry Bogard a few years back, but the reason he was deleted was Not because of an "Importance" debate, but rather the fact that There's No Space for Video Game Character articles. How lame. If only they had most of the same Regulations used here, then it would be perfect. Also, that stupid "Importance" thing was the main reason most of my Thomas articles were deleted or merged, so I gave up. I really hate that stupidass law, and they should get rid of it. TheIsraeliSudrian (talk) 08:30, 15 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Thomas edit

Hello LaG roil, It is Wellsworth96 from the TTTE Wikia and TTTE Wikia Forums Here. I am an active member of that wikiproject and I am always try to keep things straight, Like making sure pages are clean and such And I could use your help... --ACase0000 (talk) 15:41, 8 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi! First of all, I had no idea the project was still active and even attempted to close it. Second, I was only trying to port the project to the Hebrew Wikipedia a year ago, but to no avail, largely due to my translating abilities not being anywhere near as good as they are now. Third, I am still developing the Hebrew version of the Wikia, so I might be unavailable. Thank you. TheIsraeliSudrian (talk) 09:18, 9 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
That is fine, No problem! I understand, When you get time you could look over the pages. --ACase0000 (talk) 03:36, 10 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kofiko edit

Hello, TheIsraeliSudrian. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Kofiko, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

-- Aunva6talk - contribs 16:37, 30 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, TheIsraeliSudrian. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply