Sydneyphoenix

Welcome to the Wikipedia

Welcome, newcomer!

Here are some useful tips to ease you into the Wikipedia experience:

• First, take a look at the Wikipedia Tutorial, and perhaps dabble a bit in the test area.
• When you have some free time, take a look at the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines. They can come in very handy!
• Remember to use a neutral point of view!
• If you need any help, feel free to post a question at the Help Desk
• Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Also, here are some odds and ends that I find useful from time to time:

• Wikipedia:Policy Library
• Wikipedia:Utilities
• Wikipedia:Cite your sources
• Wikipedia:Verifiability
• Wikipedia:Wikiquette
• Wikipedia:Civility
• Wikipedia:Conflict resolution
• Wikipedia:Brilliant prose
• Wikipedia:Pages needing attention
• Wikipedia:Peer review
• Wikipedia:Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
• Wikipedia:Village pump
• Wikipedia:Boilerplate text

Feel free to ask me anything the links and talk pages don't answer. You can most easily reach me by posting on my talk page.

You can sign your name on any page by typing 4 tildes, likes this: ~~~~.

Best of luck, and have fun!

ClockworkSoul 06:50, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Goguryeo

Hello, Sydneyphoenix! Thanks for your interest in the Goguryeo article. One of your changes to that article is rather confusing. I'm referring to your replacing the tables of kings with a single list of "emperors."

On the Talk page, User:Nanshu had posted what is -- for him -- a very cogent explanation of why the Goguryeo rulers should be referred to as "kings" rather than "emperors." In fact, every Korean history textbook I have read uses "king" (왕/대왕) rather than "emperor" (황제/천왕) for the Goguryeo rulers.

For the time being, I have changed this section back to the version created by User:HappyDog and User:Babelfisch. If you think that is in error, please explain on Talk:Goguryeo. Thanks! -- Visviva 02:33, 31 May 2005 (UTC)

please note that all your hard work will be reverted, by others if not me, unless you can provide some convincing citations. wikipedia policy is to avoid interpreting ancient, foreign language original texts, because there are already too many self-appointed experts with their own interpretations, and we can never resolve conflicts between personal conclusions. we have to rely on reputable publications, preferably in english, preferably reference works. you may notice that i've done some work on many korean history articles, including the monarch list, and while there is much more to be done, i've tried to limit myself to independent english sources, or, if i can't find any, widely used hangul encyclopedias accessible through daum, naver, yahoo korea (britannica korea, pretty useful).

i hope you do stick around and make meaningful contributions, because many korea-related articles desperately need help. but your work will only make a difference if you can convince others not to revert you, and you do that with good references. thanks. Appleby 16:50, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

thanks, that's much better, although i'm not entirely comfortable with such detail in an overview article. would you mind also taking a look at Balhae and Buyeo (state)? they need much more detail. First Manchu expedition to Korea and Second Manchu expedition to Korea also needs much work. thanks. Appleby 23:24, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

new Portal:Korea

User:Visviva has worked hard to create a brand new Portal:Korea. Please take a look & contribute if you can. I think the new Template:Korea topics has the potential to be a more useful reference tool than categories or lists, if editors continue to expand and update it. It's also a good reminder for help & requests on ye olde notice board. Hopefully, this will help revive some activity all around. Appleby 22:16, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Million years

Hi again! I'm just dropping by to ask if you might be willing to share your source for stating that some scholars believe Korea to have been occupied for 1,000,000 years. It seems plausible, but I haven't been able to find a specific scholar who does so. Since you'd like to keep this text in the article, would you please share your source with us? Thanks! -- Visviva 09:36, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

History of Korea

Erm, Hi! It's good to see editors working on History of Korea article, but please discuss some of the changes you make at the discussion page. Erm, also, please refrain from using MR Romanization for Korea-related articles (unless they specifically pertain to North Korea ) and use Revised Romanization instead - I think this was stated in a Wikipedia guideline before. :-) Deiaemeth 06:45, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

oops, sorry about 3rr, so tired of chasing vandalism on various pages, didn't realize this page was getting up there. i didn't think of the previous version as a "truce," was just grateful that you stopped doing wholesale reverts of copyedits and wikilinking, which you started again this time. i think i gave you references to the most widely read korean encyclopedias on the topic, & hoped you'd read up on it. everything i've read then & since only confirms that gija joseon is downplayed by scholars today because they think gija has been mythologized by later generations, but nothing in the encyclopedias or any overview of korean history has ever suggested that gija joseon-gojoseon coexistence theory is a widespread academic view. you haven't provided any sources indicating that either. until you do, i'm going to have to rely on sources like [1] [2] [3]. when you start out with wholesale reverts, and do not provide references that counter references previously given to you, frankly, it looks like vandalism. i do apologize about 3rr, though, & i've self-reverted. Appleby 06:12, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

if you can spare the energy towards preserving accuracy & neutrality in korea-related articles, we could use more knowledgeable people monitoring Sea of Japan naming dispute, Dokdo, Goguryeo, and many others. Appleby 06:40, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Blue-water navy

Hi, please do not re-add the Russian Navy to the list. This issue has come up repeatedly, and I & other contributors do not consider it to be truly blue-water. Many navies have some blue-water capability, but few are really blue-water. Given the massive problems concerning the Russian Navy, it would ridiculous to given them this special status. Cheers, John Smith's 16:57, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

The main issue is that we want to keep the list short, so can't just throw in any old navy with some decent ships. And because the Russians really can't mobilise their assets any more, it's an easy one to keep off the list. John Smith's 11:04, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Korean Provisional Government

Hi, I know that many Koreans fought for the Allies in WW2 but the list in Allies of World War II is about officially-recognised, independent states, which Korea was not in 1941-45. We do not include India, the Philippines and others or the same reason. They can still be mentioned elsewhere in the article, however. Grant65 | Talk 01:45, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Korean Penisula.

Hi.

good compromise! Better than the ping-pong back and forward between Korea and Chosen.

Thanks. 125.203.207.252 10:15, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Dokdo naming dispute

Hey, another Dokdo naming dispute has arisen, & RM has taken place. Please check archive for previous discussions & pariticipate in the vote. Thanks. I'm also going to note all others who participated in the previous poll. (Wikimachine 18:29, 21 May 2007 (UTC))

Speed Skating

Hello, I've noticed you've had an interest in speed skating articles. Would you be interested in joining a WikiProject for the sport? I created a proposal where you can vote to support or oppose the creation of such a project! See it here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Speed Skating. oncamera^(t) 03:52, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

I started the Wikipedia:WikiProject Speed Skating and you can join the list of members. You can use the talk page of the Project to coordinate any ideas you have (like possible navigation and competition templates). oncamera^(t) 19:26, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Guy Daignault

A tag has been placed on Guy Daignault requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. PoinDexta1 | Talk to Me 14:41, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

February 2011

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Strange Passerby (talk • contribs • Editor review) 10:15, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited History of Korea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Khitan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. When you recently edited 50 metre pistol, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pablo Garcia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:48, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Template talk:History of Korea

Please see: Template talk:History of Korea#Recent edit warring .28July 2013.29 Thank you. Isitall (talk) 20:21, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 50 metre pistol, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joao Costa. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of multiple Olympic gold medalists in one event, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unified Team. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sydneyphoenix. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Presidents of South Korea

Howdy, the english sources count the South Korean presidents via individual, not via terms of office. GoodDay (talk) 23:31, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

PLEASE STOP, you're only going to mess them up with the current President. GoodDay (talk) 13:19, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Sydneyphoenix. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Sydneyphoenix. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

You just received an award from User:3nines

	Best Hilarious Silence
	That joke was a belter, I'm owlin! 3nines (talk) 16:10, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Question

Hey,

I noticed you added the info about the leaders of the Korean Provisional Government back in this edit [4]. Do you have any sources for the translations or where you got this information from? I've been struggling with finding consistent translations for the various titles and was wondering where you got yours from. toobigtokale (talk) 02:11, 21 June 2023 (UTC)