Sschmolling94

Your submission at Articles for creation: Schmolling Frischdienst für Molkereiprodukte GmbH & Co. Betriebs KG (October 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dr. Kadzi were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Schmolling Frischdienst für Molkereiprodukte GmbH & Co. Betriebs KG and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Schmolling Frischdienst für Molkereiprodukte GmbH & Co. Betriebs KG, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

  Kadzi   (talk) 15:21, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Sschmolling94! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!   Kadzi   (talk) 15:21, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Schmolling Frischdienst für Molkereiprodukte GmbH & Co. Betriebs KG (October 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ritchie333 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Schmolling Frischdienst für Molkereiprodukte GmbH & Co. Betriebs KG and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Schmolling Frischdienst für Molkereiprodukte GmbH & Co. Betriebs KG, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 09:39, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 09:40, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Block by Ritchie333 (Please Unblock)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sschmolling94 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello Ritchie333, I am really surprised by the fact that you have decided to block my account due to the fact that you think I am somehow advertising for this company, building, or whatever it is you think I am advertising for. First off, I would just like to say there is nothing on this page that indicates any sort of advertisement, and second I would like to ask what exactly do you think I am advertising or self-promoting? This is simply a historical article about the history of a compound in the city of Berlin and a company that has owned the buildings for the majority of its time since it was erected. I would like to also point out that this company being discussed along with the buildings is no longer in function in the way the article discusses. I would also like to note there are no paid or unpaid tours given at this site. There is no money to be made off this article being published or any need for it. This is simply an article about the history of this area in Berlin? If you go through the sources I have given which are very significant and most of which are government sources I don't understand why you have done this? I have provided a significant amount of viable research along with pictures that can be cross-referenced to support everything that is written down. If you would like the name of the article to be changed then I will happily do so. I would really appreciate it if you would retract your decision on this and allow this article to be published. I have spent a great deal of time on this research and would like to write other articles related to the other historic buildings in this district of Berlin. Sschmolling94 (talk) 10:00, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Based on explanation below, I'm not convinced that the user understands WP:NPOV editing. only (talk) 02:04, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Well, you're writing about the Schmolling family, and your username is Sschmolling94. When describing their building, you write, "Today the old Moabit Pferdebahnhof is a cultural monument of Berlin and is regularly mentioned as a historical site for locals and visitors alike to take a trip too. The brick work and design on the front administration building is a rare sight in Berlin for those fascinated in old Prussian architecture." This reads like you're trying to promote it for some reason. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:02, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello NinjaRobotPirate, thank you for your comment. I understand your concern about the username and this is my first time writing an article on here and I just used a name that was available and since the article had to do with it I used it. I don't understand your second point? I am writing about the architecture and design of a building? The whole point of history is to admire it and promote it for people to also be able to appreciate it. There is nothing at this site for people to buy? These buildings are occupied by people living and working in these buildings. Theres nothing around here to promote? The only thing you could say I am promoting is a government verified historic site in Berlin for people to visit and see if they're touring around Berlin. I don't understand how there is a anything wrong with that. (Sschmolling94 (talk) 12:23, 19 October 2020 (UTC))

Request for Unblock

Based on the feedback I have received. It's clear that I have written this article not in accordance with wiki's guidelines. May I please be unblocked and try to rewrite this from a more neutral and strictly historical point of view? I will even remove the company from the page and only focus on the buildings. Sschmolling94 (talk) 09:57, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sschmolling94 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Unblock Please Sschmolling94 (talk) 16:16, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:47, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

After all the feedback I have received. Can I please be unblocked so I can rewrite this article? It is clear that I was not fully aware of how things need to be written on Wikipedia. Thank you very much.Sschmolling94 (talk) 16:16, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Could you explain, in your own words, how Wikipedia's WP:NPOV policy works, and specifically how that would apply to articles about historical landmarks? _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:57, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Based on what I have read in the W:NPOV I need to adhere to this when editing and publishing on Wikipedia. All the content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view this means representing fairly, proportionately, and without editorial bias, all the significant views must be taken into account that have been published by reliable sources with regards to the topic. This is one of Wikipedia's 3 core content policies. During my editing I need to avoid stating opinions as facts, Avoid stating seriously contested assertions as facts, Avoid stating facts as opinions, Prefer nonjudgmental language, and Indicate the relative prominence of opposing views. I hope after this statement it will be efficient enough to allow me to rewrite this article that I have done significant research on. Thank you. Sschmolling94 (talk) 16:50, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

This is pretty much just copied from the policy, rather than being in your own words. Try again. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:31, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Rosguill More in Depth Answer

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Sschmolling94 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi Rosguill, let me try and be more clear. I am sorry if it seemed copied and pasted, but I just wanted to be as clear as possible that I have read and re-read this so I do not make the mistake again. I would like to write an article about a historical monument in Berlin. I solely want to base my writings on facts and not opinions that are backed up by verified documents that are not opinionated in any way. I will talk from a neutral point of view and not speak about the monuments in an over flattering way that is not appropriate or back up by facts. If a monument is built in a form of Prussian architecture I will simply state that and the builders, architects, etc... I will not comment on how beautiful it is. This is not my job and Wikipedia is not the place for me to give my opinion. I will discuss only facts and historical references that can be supported by the sources I provide. Therefore in the article, I will only discuss the historical timeline of the building and not boast or highlight anything in an unwelcome manner to make it sound like I am promoting it. I will be especially careful to not have any editorial bias which I did in the previous drafts. I fully accept and apologize for. This is my first time writing an article and would like to write more about the buildings in this area and I treated this more like a blog than a page that's accepted on Wikipedia. Sschmolling94 (talk) 15:46, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Accept reason:

I'm happy with the response here. If you need any help editing, please let me know. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 16:57, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

I think that this is a good enough response and a pretty clear sign of good faith on Sschmolling94's part. Pinging blocking admin Ritchie333, any objection to or thoughts on unblocking? _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:48, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

I want to see more coverage of historic buildings around the world as well, and hopefully we can get this into shape. I'm still not sure exactly what the title of the article should be, it's a building in Moabit but not the Markthalle. It might be easier to write the article on the German Wikipedia first and then translate it back here. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 16:57, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Sschmolling94 and @Ritchie333: I agree, more articles on historic buildings in Berlin (and elsewhere) would be great. I've written a few in the past and so have others, but there are tons waiting to be done. Since this building's listing as a historical monument by Berlin is under Berliner Pferdebahnhof, I would move the draft article to Draft:Berliner Pferdebahnhof and make it all about the building with only a last section in the history about the fact the dairy company now operates there. Its its history that makes it notable. Other Wikipedians can then debate over whether it should be moved to an English title and what that should be; we've gone through at least one major change of opinion on the titling of articles on buildings in Germany, with it once being established consensus to translate the building names, so Red City Hall and so on, but that's since changed and now a building whose article I edited is at Altes Stadthaus, Berlin, which at least gets around trying to find a short, comprehensible English translation for Stadthaus. By the way, it's listed at de:Liste der Kulturdenkmale in Berlin-Moabit as "Betriebshof der Großen Berliner Pferde-Eisenbahn AG"; de:Große Berliner Pferde-Eisenbahn AG redirects to de:Geschichte der Straßenbahn in Berlin, which covers it glancingly. Despite this gap on German Wikipedia, I would not advocate starting an article there and translating it, both because it's surprisingly hard to translate an article and end up with something understandable that explains what needs to be explained, and usually it's easier to achieve that by starting from scratch even if you wrote the original article, and because German Wikipedia checks new articles very thoroughly and thus discourages people from writing them. (I wrote one, I didn't do a good job, and I took up a lot of editors' time fixing it, including them really not liking English-language sources, even a thesis written at a Berlin university. All the Wikipedias are different and have their own ways of doing things.) Anyway, welcome back, and please do rework the article so we can have it. Yngvadottir (talk) 03:31, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Old Berlin Horse station has been accepted

Old Berlin Horse station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:54, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Schmolling Frischdienst für Molkereiprodukte GmbH & Co. Betriebs KG

Hello, Sschmolling94. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Schmolling Frischdienst für Molkereiprodukte GmbH & Co. Betriebs KG, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Schmolling Frischdienst für Molkereiprodukte GmbH & Co. Betriebs KG

Hello, Sschmolling94. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Schmolling Frischdienst für Molkereiprodukte GmbH & Co. Betriebs KG".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:00, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Schmolling Frischdienst für Molkereiprodukte GmbH & Co. Betriebs KG

Hello, Sschmolling94. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Schmolling Frischdienst für Molkereiprodukte GmbH & Co. Betriebs KG".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:51, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Schmolling Frischdienst für Molkereiprodukte GmbH & Co. Betriebs KG

Hello, Sschmolling94. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Schmolling Frischdienst für Molkereiprodukte GmbH & Co. Betriebs KG".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:45, 17 April 2022 (UTC)