Problems with upload of File:Iibd logo.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:Iibd logo.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:05, 20 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Problems with upload of File:Ambarish Srivastava.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:Ambarish Srivastava.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 20 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of Indian Institute of Building Designers Association edit

I have nominated Indian Institute of Building Designers Association, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian Institute of Building Designers Association. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Atmoz (talk) 03:35, 19 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

September 2009 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added such as to the page Sitapur do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -SpacemanSpiffCalvinHobbes 23:37, 30 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Ambarish Srivastava edit

 

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Ambarish Srivastava. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ambarish Srivastava. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 2 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please do not recreate articles deleted through the Articles for Deletion process. If you wish to contest the deletion, you can take it to Deletion Review. —SpacemanSpiff 06:02, 9 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Deletion of article Ambarish Srivastava edit

Spjayswal67 (talk) 07:26, 9 February 2010 (UTC) I have provided all possible references including newspaper cuttings, Pics of all awards and certificates related to article Ambarish Srivastava still it was deleted while Ambarish Srivastava is a prominent and notable person who is a best architectural engineer of sitapur who is at topmost position as well as a prominent Hindi Auther and poet, he is the first person who got the Indira Gandhi Priydarshini Award at Sitapur, although first of all this award was awarded to mother teresa so What should be the criteria of notability? and how it should be prove as per your rules? because in our country coverage in news papers are to much important than coverage in website. now i am feeling insulting myself and it appears i am wasting my valuable time with wikipedia so i can not work with wikipedia! so bye.... for ever and it is suggested that you should review your policies in future. Sad: S. P. Jaiswal. Please delete my account!Reply

For the record: this editor added other links with possible sources for the award and the person at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Ambarish Srivastava. He also kept a copy of the article at User:Spjayswal67/Ambarish Srivastava. - Fayenatic (talk) 14:09, 9 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

When you are done expanding/sourcing the article, feel free to contact me on my talk page. I will help you set up a Wikipedia:Deletion review discussion that will determine whether or not the changes you have made to the article are sufficient to reinstate it to the mainspace. Thanks for your hard work uploading those newspaper cuttings and pictures. Keep up the good work, and don't get discouraged. Although I can't read the newspaper clippings, I believe that they may be enough to establish notability. Cheers, Cunard (talk) 09:11, 10 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • Thanks Mr.Cunard! Please visit my userspace draft, User:Spjayswal67/Ambarish Srivastava as per my views it is fully referenced with inline citations. if u feel any fault there please suggest me about what should i do for it's health?. if you think that it is fully referenced with inline citations, please bring the article back to Wikipedia:Deletion review.Regards Spjayswal67 (talk) 20:21, 13 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • I am reading your userspace draft right now and will do a little work (formatting fixes, etc.) before bringing it back to Wikipedia:Deletion review. Cheers, Cunard (talk) 07:45, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • Thanks Mr. Cunard i appreciate your support and i am being impressed with your work without prejudice, Best regards,Spjayswal67 (talk) 13:00, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

February 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at User talk:DGG, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. CobaltBlueTony™ talk 20:55, 22 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
Hello, Spjayswal67. You have new messages at Cunard's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cunard (talk) 10:18, 24 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Spjayswal67. Please provide a reference for the following statement: "Since he could not attend the award ceremoney because he got injured in a road accident at December 2007, he was honored this award at his home through post office Sitapur." Thanks for your hard work! Cunard (talk) 10:49, 24 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • Hi, Cunard. Thanks again for your valuable advice. As per yor advice, I have provide a reference which is same as reference no-7 Which translation is:
  • 1. This News Title : Ambarish Indira Gamdhi Priyadarshini Award se Sammanit [Ambarish honored to Indira Gandhi Priyadarshini Award]: p. 04. 2007-12-07.

Name of Newspaper :“Dainik Jagran” , Lucknow , 07 December 2007 | Page 4| Sitapur Ambarish honored to Indira Gandhi Priyadarshini Award (Indira Gandhi Priyadarshini Award to Amberish) Sitapur, 6 December Here's Architectural engineer Ambarish Srivastava have been awarded the Indira Gandhi Priyadarshini Award. The honor of Award on behalf of National Unity Conference has been posted to him. Mr. Srivastava was not found to receive honor at Delhi due to became Injured. He was invited by the National Unity Conference to receive this award at constitutional club Rafi Marg, New Delhi, he was to be provided this award the same day in the award ceremony but he was injured in a road accident on 11 October 2007 . He received the award recently through post office. Resistant to Sitapur ,Architectural engineer Ambarish Srivastava, particularly work in the field of earthquake resistant construction and design than work for the welfare of workers. For these actions he received this honor. Spjayswal67 (talk) 18:08, 24 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Vandal Edits edit

Intothefire (talk) 06:48, 27 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Government of Uttaranchal(INDIA) also confirms it at in Raja Todar Mal section (The Akbar Nama : Abu-I-Fazl : Translated from the Persian by Henry Beveridge, ICS. Pages : 61-62. Vol. III). It may be possible that he was shifted to Lahore from Laharpur. About his caste A Book : The Minister for permanent unrest Topic: “And on You also be Peace” Page 220 at Line 4 confirms that he was from a kayastha community and another book Introduction the medieval legacy Page 25, second last line shows that he was a Khatri Raja. Spjayswal67 (talk) 11:45, 27 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • In the Introduction of above article it is mentioned at Line seven "He was from the Kayastha community who holds yagyopavita (Janeo).". I think It should be like that " As per some available sources He may be from the Kayastha community who holds yagyopavita (Janeo) which appears also reliable."Italic text —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.197.25.239 (talk) 12:50, 27 February 2010 (UTC) Spjayswal67 (talk) 12:53, 27 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Mediation Cabal: Case update edit

 

Dear Spjayswal67: Hi there! I'd like to let you know that in a Mediation Cabal mediation case that you are involved in, or have some connection with:

Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2011-02-26/Ambarish_Srivastava

I've made the following changes:

I've taken this case as your mediator, and left talk page messages to the other people you mentioned asking whether they would like to participate.

Please have a look at the mediation case page linked to above, and participate in the current stage of the mediation process if you wish. Of course, participation is completely optional, and if you don't want to take part in this mediation at any point, that's totally fine. If you have any questions or concerns relating to this dispute, the mediation, or the Mediation Cabal in general, please do let me know. Thank you very much. Best regards, NicholasTurnbull | (talk) 06:46, 9 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks to accept this case as a mediator. I wish to participate in the case which is referred as above. Spjayswal67 (talk) 18:22, 9 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Regretfully, your case has been closed. The reason for this is that the other parties named in the mediation did not affirm their acceptance of mediation within 7 days of the case being opened. Should you be able to gain their support for voluntary participation in the future, you may request that the case is reopened. --NicholasTurnbull | (talk) 11:19, 16 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your kind support! Also in future If other parties named in the mediation will not affirm their acceptance of mediation, then what should I do? Regards:Spjayswal67 (talk) 20:20, 18 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Hi there Spjayswal67, I received a talk page message (which I overlooked by mistake; my apologies) from Cunard (talk · contribs) asking for me to provide you with some guidance. Unfortunately, mediation from either the Mediation Cabal or the Mediation Committee requires all parties to affirm acceptance of mediation in order for mediation to take place. Alternative dispute resolution methods which you may like to explore are Wikipedia:Requests for comments and Wikipedia:Editor assistance. If in the event of an RfC failing as well as other approaches to resolving the dispute, and the parties concerned will not affirm acceptance of mediation, only then (once all other approaches are exhausted) you could consider bringing the case to arbitration at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration. Sincerely, --NicholasTurnbull | (talk) 15:37, 27 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ambarish Srivastava for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ambarish Srivastava is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ambarish Srivastava (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Softlavender (talk) 10:47, 27 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hmm... edit

I will ask this straight and what's your connection with Ambarish Srivastava? Do you know him personally? And, given your single-purpose activities over a span of 8 years, I'm bound to invoke concerns of undisclosed paid editing.~ Winged BladesGodric 06:41, 28 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

  • And I'm going to ask you one last time to stop using Wikipedia like Justdial or the Yellow Pages, or else you will find yourself blocked pretty soon. —SpacemanSpiff 07:04, 28 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • Some facts. I was absent from Wikipedia due to SpacemanSpiff because he was going to erase my article slowly and nobody was listening to me, so I decided to stop editing here. I thought that the article created by me might have survived by this move, but unfortunately starting of in this month when I found that he had almost wiped it out and put the tag of the dollar on it, then I came back for which you can block me forever but I am asking him that if there was notability problem in this article and if this person is not notable then why this article was allotted to main space? Why Mr. Spiff had taken 8 years to delete it’s material. He was also present in that discussion and why did he not deleted it immediately?Spjayswal67 (talk) 15:49, 29 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • There is no any connection between me and Ambarish Srivastava.Spjayswal67 (talk) 16:06, 29 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

ANI notice edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Spjayswal67: SPA since 2009 with many recent issues. Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 13:05, 30 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

March 2018 edit

 
You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN talk to me 14:01, 30 March 2018 (UTC)Reply