Snowdawg

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

gun names in infoboxes

When adding links to gun in ship infoboxes, please do not add their designation. Forex, you've been adding links to French submarine deck guns such as [[Canon_de_75_modèle_1897#Naval_and_coastal_artillery|{{convert|75|mm|in|abbr=on}} L/34 M1897]] Please do not add caliber length or model desigations. That information is best reserved for the main body as I've gotten complaints of overly long infoboxes from editors in the past. I'd greatly appreciate it if you'd remove those from all of your recent edits on French subs.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:18, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Unused US guns in WWI

I looked at 37 mm Infantry Gun Model 1917, and my research has shown it was far from alone in being relegated to artillery parks "somewhere in France". I've come across evidence of 30-some 10-inch railway guns (that were shipped to France to get their carriages), and at least 72 6-inch and 26 5-inch former coast defense guns, which never saw action because their units didn't complete training before the Armistice. Reportedly the 5-inchers never received ammo. I haven't found who was supposed to operate the 10-inchers. The details are at this link, and the US efforts to get railway guns built are here. In field artillery, we didn't produce many usable pieces before the Armistice, but something happened (skilled workers came home?) and we produced a lot before winding down after the Treaty of Versailles. Just FYI. RobDuch (talk·contribs) 01:26, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Missing cite in 75 mm Field Gun M1897 on M2 Carriage

The article cites "Crowell 1919" but no such source is listed in bibliography. Can you please add? Also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and paste importScript('User:Svick/HarvErrors.js'); // Backlink: [[User:Svick/HarvErrors.js]] to your common.js page. Thanks, Renata (talk) 04:17, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

File:SMS Gneisenau before World War I.jpg

Hey, I reverted your change to that image, as I don't think it's better (and in fact, I think it looks worse when compressed to a thumbnail size in the article). If you want to try to restore the image to remove the yellowish tint, be my guest, but I don't think a lower-res, grainier image is an improvement. Parsecboy (talk) 16:13, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Snowdawg

Thank you for creating Cannone da 76/17 S modello 12.

User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Very nice job on your recent artillery articles. Keep up the good work.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:35, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

@Onel5969: Thank you for your kind comments. I have a problem that you may be able to help with. The talk page for my sandbox points to the talk page for an article that I created long ago. If I delete the talk page for my sandbox it deletes the talk page for the article as well. So the two have become linked by the page move process and neither can be modified without effecting the other. Do you know how I can fix that? Snowdawg (talk) 14:01, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Snowdawg, that's actually an easy fix, you simply remove the redirect template from your sandbox talk page, which I've done for you. May all the issues I come upon today in WP be that easy to correct! Keep up the good work. And don't be afraid to ask other editors for help. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:17, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 7.7 cm FK 96 n.A., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Messines. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Measurements used by militaries

Please don't change meters to yards or vice-versa conversions to km or miles and revert those changes you've already made. Neither of the latter is used by any large military that I'm aware of.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:08, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Regards

Hello Snowdawg! As I've seen your'e actually active in artillery. Nice. Regards from de:P:MIL & de:P:WF. Best --Ｔｏｍ (talk) 20:03, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Douglas R4D-8

Hi Snowdog, you did a very good job on the article, but it needed improvements. and changes to follow the aircraft article section order recommendations per WP:AIR/PC. I'm not sure why you're not trying to follow the recommendations, but this is what almost all other aircraft articles use. Please remember this isn't your article, and anyone is free to make changes to improve it, per WP:OWN. Please note that you have reverted at least 2 times, and so are close to the 3RR limit. It would be a shame if you got blocke for edit warring on an article. that you created. BilCat (talk) 20:22, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation pages are needed for C-117 and R4D. Because R4D-1, R4D-3, R4D-5, R4D-6, and R4D-7 are USN/USMC designations of aircraft based on the DC-3/C-47. The same goes for C-117A, C-117B, and C-117C which are USAAF/USAF designations of aircraft based on the DC-3/C-47. The R4D-8 and C-117D are converted USN/USMC R4D-5, R4D-6, and R4D-7s.Snowdawg (talk) 00:03, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation pages are unnecessary per WP:TWODABS. Just use hatnotes. BilCat (talk) 02:54, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Hint

Hello Snowdawg! Because of your Works here[1] i suggest to have some attension. German de:P:WF is on the Way to prepare a more extense Summary there [2]. Best Ｔｏｍ (talk) 19:23, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Snowdawg. Thank you for your work on Cannone da 75/27 A.V.. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:53, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Bofors 57 mm anti-tank gun moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bofors 57 mm anti-tank gun, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:34, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bofors 57 mm anti-tank gun has been accepted

Bofors 57 mm anti-tank gun, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 04:52, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Listings

Hello dear Snowdawg! You might keep an eye on de:Kennblätter fremden Geräts and its extended filecollection in c:Category:D 50 Kennblätter fremden Geräts. This list is supported by members of de:Portal:Waffen and might be helpful for addtions in en:WP. Best --Ｔｏｍ (talk) 10:28, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Russian 28 cm L/20 M1867

I just created 28 cm L/20 M67. I now see at Category:World War I artillery of Russia that the naming of pages for Russian guns is not that consistent. Most are named for the diameter in mm, but others, e.g. the somewhat later 11-inch gun M1877 are named in inches. Is there a reason to keep the name in inches for some pages, or would it better to rename the few deviating gun pages to a format {diameter in mm}/optional:{length in caliber}/{Gun|Howitzer|Mortar}/{M yyyy}? Which would mean that I rename 28 cm L/20 M67 to 279 mm L/20 Gun M1867?Grieg2 (talk) 17:05, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

The Russians like the British originally had guns designated in inches and poods which is a measure of weight. During the late 1880s Russia switched to metric. However, I don't believe the classification of their existing guns changed. Snowdawg (talk) 17:56, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Thank you, I solved part of the problem by giving a default sort to the Russian Naval Gun pages, so they at least display in a logical order.Grieg2 (talk) 08:18, 11 February 2024 (UTC)