Fayetteville-Manlius High School edit

The Original Barnstar

  The Original Barnstar
awarded for your amazing work on Fayetteville-Manlius High School, adding quantified information from multiple sources.

Wow! You've done a really outstanding job on this article. Kudos! Karen | Talk | contribs 01:29, 14 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

  • Not really related, but thank you for replacing the HTML cruft at the top of the FMCSD page. I was looking for a school district specific infobox but I couldn't find one. I suppose the HS one does just as well. vlad§inger tlk 01:40, 14 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

DJVac edit

Just thought I'd let you know he's trying to put those same link collections into the Tops article now. I see you didn't get anywhere trying to discuss these things. He has reverted my edits once without explanation ... I really don't feel like taking this to 3RR. But your failure to get him to resolve differences of opinion (i.e., follow policy) and mine, if that happens, gives us enough for an RFC if it has to go that far. Daniel Case 18:34, 20 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've had it with him after his latest revert. I will be taking this to WP:AN/I and possibly WP:3RR. Daniel Case 01:48, 21 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

He has been blocked for two days. Daniel Case 04:05, 21 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

University of the State of New York edit

As a New York State contributor who has contributed to the subject article in the past, you may have knowledge or know of sources that might help resolve the current content issue with that article. If so, please visit its Talk page. --orlady 15:12, 6 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia New York Meet-Up edit

 
NEW YORK CITY MEET UP!!

Howdy! Please come to the First Annual New York Wikipedian Central Park Picnic. R.S.V.P. @ Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC
--David Shankbone 18:17, 20 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cool username edit

My compliments on a very cool username. Are you aware of the Bella Fleck song of the same name?

Feel free to drop by my talk page if you have any questions or need something done that requires sysop access. Cheers!--Chaser - T 06:55, 2 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia Pennsylvania edit

Hello there!

I'm writing to inform you that we are now forming the first local Wikimedia Chapter in the United States: Wikimedia Pennsylvania. Our goals are to perform outreach and fundraising activities on behalf of the various Wikimedia projects. If you're interested in being a part of the chapter, or just want to know more, you can:

Thanks and I hope you join up! Cbrown1023 talk 04:28, 9 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

User:DJVaccar edit

I reported this user as a puppetmaster. Suggest you add your opinion to WP:SSP ... richi 13:52, 8 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Welcome edit

Hi saw your recent assessment and thought I'd say welcome to a new person. I also looked at the school you got a barnstar for and yes it looks good. I'm going to steal your REF box on your front page. If only we could get all our editors to use them then we would increase the quality of articles tremendously. So again welcome. Victuallers 07:46, 24 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

I'd like to echo Victuallers' sentiments and add my own. I hope you enjoy assessing and decide to stay. Adam McCormick 16:04, 24 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Images edit

Hello. I added some images to the page. I try my best, but be aware there are some technical flaws like JPEG artifacts that I, nor anyone else stuck with a consumer level camera can overcome. If you feel that these are "awful", feel free to remove them. However, I do feel that any relevant image adds, rather than detracts from an article. Good luck with the GA nomination. You've done a good job. vlad§inger tlk 03:20, 25 August 2007 (UTC)Reply


Your GA nomination of Fayetteville-Manlius Central School District edit

The article Fayetteville-Manlius Central School District you nominated as a good article has failed  , see Talk:Fayetteville-Manlius Central School District for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a review. Noetic Sage 00:05, 12 September 2007 (UTC)Reply


Syracuse revives... edit

Hi Sinisterminister -- Just a note to claim that Wikipedia:WikiProject Syracuse, New York is at least somewhat revived, with a couple people contributing and a good number of new articles. See the new article list on the main webpage of the project. I noticed you mentioned being on the east side of Syracuse. I wonder in particular if you could snap some pics of some historic homes in east side neighborhoods, for articles like those I have started working on that address Camillus and west side neighborhoods. Anyhow, hope you can return and participate! doncram (talk) 01:29, 25 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Big East Basketball edit

I see you were very active in editing the 2009 Big East Men's Basketball Tournament. You should create a page like 2008–09 Atlantic Coast Conference men's basketball season or 2008–09 Big Ten Conference men's basketball season for the Big East since it is doing so well this year.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 23:35, 29 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Firstly, there's no rationale on the image page for this use, and so you really shouldn't be adding it. Secondly, regardless of whether it is "standard practice" to use non-free images incorrectly, what the team logo looks like is completely unimportant when discussing the team's performance in a certain year. Please do not edit war over this; our non-free content criteria are as much a policy as any other, and anyone who persistently violates them will face blocks. J Milburn (talk) 18:15, 29 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

I remove problem images when and where I see them. I'm not targetting you or your articles in any way. As for the passive aggressive tone- yes, I was warning you. I did not appreciate your reversions. J Milburn (talk) 19:41, 29 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
You're welcome to report me whereever you like, but you'd be wasting your time. Part of the reason I'm rather hasty in my replies is that I'd rather be dealing with other things. Further, the fact that there happens to be a "rationale" on the image page doesn't suddenly mean the image is required. It's simply adding nothing to those articles, and we use non-free content as a last resort, when the article would be severly lacking without it. J Milburn (talk) 20:14, 29 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

I see you've taken the liberty of adding the image back to the year articles. It does not belong there. Again, please be aware that edit warring, and lack of regard for our non-free content critieria, may lead to blocks. J Milburn (talk) 20:21, 29 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

I agree that a non-free image's use can be valid on many articles. That doesn't mean that this one is... That discussion has little to do with what we're discussing here, as far as I can see. J Milburn (talk) 20:44, 29 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
There is a longstanding consensus that in the article about the team, the logo is useful. This is not any article about the team; it is the article about the team. For comparison, we do not need a non-free image of the cover of the book in the articles about every character. Any usage of the logo beyond this is going to have to be individually demonstrated as useful- you can't just assume it's ok. J Milburn (talk) 21:32, 29 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Great work. edit

Nice work on Syracuse basketball. Really appreciate the hard work you've put into the page. GoCuse44 (talk) 04:13, 19 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

  The Running Man Barnstar
For great work on Syracuse basketball GoCuse44 (talk) 04:12, 19 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Cuomo introduction edit

You're right. Since the article cited discusses "swearing in." I've changed the text to "been sworn in" instead of "assumed office." I think you'll agree that this is accurate and relevant. Please do not alter this accurate edit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.50.195 (talk) 19:15, 1 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Please see your talk page for my responses. And please follow the Talk page guidelines when writing on this or other talk pages. Sinisterminister (talk) 22:36, 1 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

I think we both violated wikipedia policy on the WP:3RR rule. I'm a rookie so I didn't know but shame on you. To be fair to the community, I think we should both be blocked or whatever the appropriate punishment is. Sorry things got so personal between us. 75.73.50.195 (talk) 01:37, 2 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

  • Not to get involved in the dispute, but since it cropped up again, just thought I'd point out that when doing a quick search, while sources do say 12:01, there appear to be plenty of sources that say midnight. Since 'midnight' is a term meaning end of day and beginning of day, one day ends from 11:59pm to 12;00midnight, and the next begins at 12:00midnight to 12:01am, it seems that midnight covers both. But I'll leave that to a consensus of the regular editors on the page. Just want to make sure it's not subject to edit warring and is hashed out on the talk page first. You can respond here, I've got your talkpage watchlisted - keep it all together... :) Dreadstar 13:41, 12 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
In case you missed it: [1]. Dreadstar 16:40, 12 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the update. I've since pulled myself away from the inaugural semantics. But wow. Just, wow :-/ Sinisterminister (talk) 19:53, 12 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Cuomo edit

Just a note to be cautious about WP:3RR on Andrew Cuomo. Dreadstar 22:28, 1 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. I have refrained from editing the page, but assure you that I have been acting in good faith, and have requested editor assistance, as well as engaged the article's discussion page. Sinisterminister (talk) 22:33, 1 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
I totally understand and agree, just a fair note in light of this one.  :) Dreadstar 22:43, 1 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Barnstar edit

Wow! Thank you, that's one of the most awesome compliments I've ever received! Thanks so much for the kind words, it means a lot to me....and I'm glad to have been able to assist! Dreadstar 19:44, 5 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge edit

  You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Sinisterminister. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Coordinators and help needed edit

  Hi, if you are active on Wikipedia and are still interested in helping out with urgent tasks on our large Schools Project, please let us know here. We look forward to hearing from you.


Sent to project members 13:58, 29 August 2021 (UTC). You can opt of messages here.