User talk:SemiHypercube/Archive 1

Latest comment: 4 years ago by 2601:1C0:6D00:845:D66:D476:82CA:D7E9 in topic ANI
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 5

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, SemiHypercube, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 19:22, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

  The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
In recognition of your vigilance and speed in dealing with vandals. “Admin material” describes you well! Tesseractive (talk) 00:23, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Twinkle & "Tesseractive"

Hi :) Thank you for your contributions. When your account is automatically confirmed, you might be interested in trying this tool: WP:Twinkle - it can be enabled as a "Gadget" in your preferences and will make the relatively tedious work of using the "undo" command, manually selecting the last revision before vandalism, finding a good template and adding it to the user's talk page, much easier.

When I saw the Anti-Vandalism barnstar by "Tesseractive", I noticed that "Tesseract" is just another word for "Hypercube" and might seem to have been only registered to deliver this barnstar to your userpage. You are allowed to use multiple accounts to edit Wikipedia, but this should not be used in a way that could be considered "sockpuppetry". I'm honestly sorry if I am wrong, but I'll dare to ask this question - did you register both SemiHypercube and Tesseractive?   ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:42, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

To your question about Tesseractive: No. I did not register that account. SemiHypercube (talk) 19:45, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Okay, sorry then. I would have suggested to add {{User_alternative_account_banner|SemiHypercube}} to the user page of Tesseractive to easily solve the situation, if it would be your account. But I was probably wrong. Please disregard my message.   ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:48, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

A dumpling for you!

  yummy dumpling
For greatly contributing to the sockpuppet investigations on the classist(I think, I'm not sure if anyone truly knows what he's getting at) Chinese vandal, You get a classic Chinese delicacy.💵Money💵emoji💵Talk 14:13, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

 
Hello, SemiHypercube/Archive 1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 22:56, 9 April 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

The Mahavamsa does not supported Sinhala nationalism, the article which was written, does not summarise what is written in there. That's why i removed it. NJackJ (talk) 13:14, 18 April 2018 (UTC)NJackJ

New recipe user

Any chance that User:Chanatinart.thames could be yet another one? The title of the user page contains an anagram of a popular phrase much overused lately.  Velella  Velella Talk   20:58, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

@Velella: I wouldn't think that's the fuerdai vandal, as they would be editing a lot more, wouldn't be creating their own page, and probably would be blocked by now. You could wait, but I wouldn't count on it. SemiHypercube (talk) 21:05, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
Also, I think they'd use some form of "sockpuppet", "vandal", or anything that sounds slightly like "fuerdai" in their username. SemiHypercube (talk) 21:08, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you Welcoming me into Wikipedia! It means so much to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HurricameWilma344224 (talkcontribs) 21:02, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi SemiHyperCube 21:21, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Semi can I ask you something HurricameWilma344224 (talk) 21:24, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

What? SemiHypercube (talk) 21:26, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Can you help — Preceding unsigned comment added by HurricameWilma344224 (talkcontribs) 21:27, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

IPhones Fuerdai vandal

Don't need to report it at SPI per WP:DENY, just simply report it at WP:AIV if you found out any obvious vandal accounts. SA 13 Bro (talk) 17:25, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Can I support the above plea, he or she is currently getting far too much attention at SPI which is presumably what he/she/it wants. Stop feeding it and it may get hungry and look elsewhere for weird gratification.  Velella  Velella Talk   12:56, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for thanking me. As with everyone, I appreciate it, especially here. This user has been ticking me off for the better part of two days. Rock on. UnsungKing123 (talk) 20:22, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Rollback granted

 

Hi SemiHypercube. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Mz7 (talk) 00:35, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

@Mz7: Thanks! SemiHypercube (talk) 00:36, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you very much

The RfC discussion to eliminate portals was closed May 12, with the statement "There exists a strong consensus against deleting or even deprecating portals at this time." This was made possible because you and others came to the rescue. Thank you for speaking up.

By the way, the current issue of the Signpost features an article with interviews about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

I'd also like to let you know that the Portals WikiProject is working hard to make sure your support of portals was not in vain. Toward that end, we have been working diligently to innovate portals, while building, updating, upgrading, and maintaining them. The project has grown to 80 members so far, and has become a beehive of activity.

Our two main goals at this time are to automate portals (in terms of refreshing, rotating, and selecting content), and to develop a one-page model in order to make obsolete and eliminate most of the 150,000 subpages from the portal namespace by migrating their functions to the portal base pages, using technologies such as selective transclusion. Please feel free to join in on any of the many threads of development at the WikiProject's talk page, or just stop by to see how we are doing. If you have any questions about portals or portal development, that is the best place to ask them.

If you would like to keep abreast of developments on portals, keep in mind that the project's members receive updates on their talk pages. The updates are also posted here, for your convenience.

Again, we can't thank you enough for your support of portals, and we hope to make you proud of your decision. Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   11:07, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

P.S.: if you reply to this message, please {{ping}} me. Thank you. -TT

A barnstar for you!

  The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Awesome work reverting vandalism! L293D ( • ) 00:21, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
@L293D: Thank to you too! Keep up the good work! SemiHypercube (talk) 00:27, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

 

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

TonyBallioni (talk) 12:08, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

@TonyBallioni: Thanks! Wow, that was quick! It took a few days for my rollback request to be accepted, but this took a few minutes! Thanks again! SemiHypercube (talk) 12:10, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Reverting

Those edits were nothing but the truth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1008:B12F:F6D:59C4:1E57:65D3:698C (talk) 13:31, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

I reverted your edit because you can't argue a merge by adding a note to an archived case. The best way to do it in the future is to approach a member of the SPI team who is familiar with at least one of the cases and explain what you think should be done and why. That said, your edit got my attention, and you're right.  I will ask a clerk to merge the two. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:14, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Venba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Model (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

I got a new signature!

SemiHypercube 16:05, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Nice! did you take the crayon character from mine? L293D ( • ) 02:05, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
@L293D: Yes. I also used your signature for the shadow effect. SemiHypercube 09:46, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
(I also stole mine from L293D btw)💵Money💵emoji💵💸 16:57, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Garfi (cat)

I added some references to Garfi (cat). You may want to revisit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garfi (cat). Eastmain (talkcontribs) 03:48, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

WP:UAA reports on users with no edits

 Generally, there is no reason to report usernames with no edits whatsoever. Per WP:UAAI: "Wait until the user edits. Do not report a user that hasn't edited unless they are clearly a vandal. We do not want to welcome productive editors with a report at UAA, nor do we want to waste our time dealing with accounts that may never be used." The exceptions are obvious hate speech or names that attack a living person/Wikipedia editor, those are blockable even without any edits, but other run-of-the-mill violations need not be reported unless and until they at least attempt to edit, and you should be able to clearly explain what the problem is if it is not immediately evident.

For whatever reason, every day dozens, if not hundreds of accounts are created that never make one single edit. It is our responsibility as admins to conscientiously review every report a user makes at UAA, so we have to check for contribs, deleted contribs, and tripping of the edit filter for every one of these reports, only to find out there's nothing there and therefore no problem to be solved. So we add the {{wait}} tag to the report, it goes to WP:UAA/HP for a week or more, and must then be reviewed again to see if the account has since become active before removing it. That's time that could be spent doing more productive things, but you basically obligate admins to do it by making such reports. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:04, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Please stop

Please stop reporting so many users with no edits. The mere presence of words like “fart” or “sex” are not enough to block someone who has not even attempted to edit. Again, we only block the worst of the worst without waiting for them to edit. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:02, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

And again

The same goes for “bot” usernames. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:44, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

@Beeblebrox: Sorry. I was too hasty that time. SemiHypercube 00:16, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

I’m relived to hear you say so. Keep up the other good reports you are making! Beeblebrox (talk) 00:30, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sangi Takht District, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bandar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Biographies of living persons

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Biographies of living persons. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 04:28, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Split and merge

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Split and merge. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Taiwan stations)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Taiwan stations). Legobot (talk) 04:28, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Legobot (talk) 04:32, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

These bots, asking me to participate in a request for comment I started. SemiHypercube 19:18, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Interface administrators

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Interface administrators. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Non-free content

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

User talk:195.204.12.242

FYI: talk page privileges request on WP:ANI#User talk:195.204.12.242. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 11:14, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

@Jim1138: Yes, I know, but I'm not an admin, so I can't revoke TPA for that guy. SemiHypercube 11:21, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
That was just an FYI, not a request. The anon will probably restore it again... Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 11:42, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

RfA supports

Responding to your comment at Sir Sputnik's RfA — which, incidentally, you might consider moving to MA's talk page, as it's offtopic for the RfA — a single oppose against a sea of 49 supports is hardly a problem. Folks do indeed fail RfA for myriad reasons, but being opposed is not nearly the same as failing. ~ Amory (utc) 21:22, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

@Amorymeltzer: Moved comment his talk page. SemiHypercube 21:42, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (people). Legobot (talk) 04:29, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Username policy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Username policy. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (organizations and companies)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (organizations and companies). Legobot (talk) 04:33, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

This IP belongs to a high school.

Hello there, SemiHypercube. I am student in the Durham District school board, and I occasionally check the contributions for whatever ip I'm on. As you are the individual who actually responded to this ip's vandalism, I am informing you of this, hopefully so you can take this up the ladder and prevent this IP from editing. Thanks. 204.50.168.226 (talk) 17:10, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

This IP has been blocked now, but thanks for reminding me. SemiHypercube 18:50, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

 

Thank you! :) Can I ask your help again? It seems that I need a lot of help.

SaviiDigital (talk) 07:38, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Notice of A/N discussion that mentions you

You are mentioned in this WP:A/N post: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Request_review_of_AN/I_close. Although I did ping you when I posted it, I am providing you this additional notification. --David Tornheim (talk) 07:32, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

@David Tornheim: You are not required to notify editors on your "side" against whom you were not requesting any action. Doing so actually looks somewhat like canvassing, which given that so far consensus is unanimous that Swarm's final warning to you should stand you should probably be a bit more careful about. Hijiri 88 (やや) 07:49, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2018).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • Partial blocks is now available for testing on the Test Wikipedia. The new functionality allows you to block users from editing specific pages. Bugs may exist and can be reported on the local talk page or on Meta. A discussion regarding deployment to English Wikipedia will be started by community liaisons sometime in the near future.
  • A user script is now available to quickly review unblock requests.
  • The 2019 Community Wishlist Survey is now accepting new proposals until November 11, 2018. The results of this survey will determine what software the Wikimedia Foundation's Community Tech team will work on next year. Voting on the proposals will take place from November 16 to November 30, 2018. Specifically, there is a proposal category for admins and stewards that may be of interest.

  Arbitration

  • Eligible editors will be invited to nominate themselves as candidates in the 2018 Arbitration Committee Elections starting on November 4 until November 13. Voting will begin on November 19 and last until December 2.
  • The Arbitration Committee's email address has changed to arbcom-en wikimedia.org. Other email lists, such as functionaries-en and clerks-l, remain unchanged.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:19, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Talkback

 
Hello, SemiHypercube. You have new messages at L293D's talk page.
Message added 16:38, 8 November 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thewinrat (talk) 16:38, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

@Thewinrat: In the future, I don't need talkback messages, a ping is OK. SemiHypercube 16:40, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
@SemiHypercube: Ah, double nuts. do i delete this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thewinrat (talkcontribs) 16:44, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
Not needed, it will archive sooner or later. SemiHypercube 16:45, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018

...? SemiHypercube 01:03, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
@AlbertOfPrussia: Was this a mistake? I'm sure my edits weren't vandalism (though I may have mistook an edit for vandalism), did you mean to put it on someone else's page? SemiHypercube 01:05, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
@SemiHypercube: Sorry I made a mistake I mistook your reversion edit for the actual vandalism AlbertOfPrussia

A barnstar for you!

  The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Excellent Job! Jebcubed (talk) 16:49, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, SemiHypercube. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Cabal

I am not accusing Administrators as a whole as forming a cabal. There are some corrupt Administrators who treat their friends in an unequal fashion. They have backchannel communications that are alluded to in their front facing comments. I monitor a bunch of Admins talk pages, not out of suspicion but because I have had interactions with them. I don't bother to turn it off after it has blown over because on wikipedia you really never know when something has blown over. I have a memory of the ones I have had unjust responses from. Those seem to be the same ones with the suspicious talk entries both inbound and outbound. It is obvious these Admins take care of their own, to the detriment of the world knowledge project of wikipedia. I know who not to take a problem to and I do vote based on that information. If I sound cynical and jaded about Administrators as a whole, it is because these rotten apples spoil the whole bunch. I've also had positive interactions with Administrators and have my list of who I would trust to go to with an issue that shouldn't go public. Trackinfo (talk) 03:24, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Need assistance to improve my article

Hi, SemiHypercube!

First, thank you for such a prompt reviewing :)! Can you advise me how to change/improve my article so it does not sound like an add text? Even if the topic turns out to be off limits, I will still have valuable knowledge about how to write a good Wiki article and how things work here on Wiki!

Hope to get your help Savii

Bob

The IPv6 editor whose address ends in 63 is actually a very well respected long term Wikipedian called Bob. I'm going to just nominate his userpage for speedy deletion, which is probably what the editor prior to you should have done. Just a heads up. Bob can be very helpful, and following his talk page can be illuminating. Happy editing! John from Idegon (talk) 02:44, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2018).

 

  Administrator changes

  Al Ameer sonRandykittySpartaz
  BosonDaniel J. LeivickEfeEsanchez7587Fred BauderGarzoMartijn HoekstraOrangemike

  Interface administrator changes

 Deryck Chan

  Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, the Mediation Committee is now closed and will no longer be accepting case requests.
  • A request for comment is in progress to determine whether members of the Bot Approvals Group should satisfy activity requirements in order to remain in that role.
  • A request for comment is in progress regarding whether to change the administrator inactivity policy, such that administrators "who have made no logged administrative actions for at least 12 months may be desysopped". Currently, the policy states that administrators "who have made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least 12 months may be desysopped".
  • A proposal has been made to temporarily restrict editing of the Main Page to interface administrators in order to mitigate the impact of compromised accounts.

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

  • In late November, an attacker compromised multiple accounts, including at least four administrator accounts, and used them to vandalize Wikipedia. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately. Sharing the same password across multiple websites makes your account vulnerable, especially if your password was used on a website that suffered a data breach. As these incidents have shown, these concerns are not pure fantasies.
  • Wikipedia policy requires administrators to have strong passwords. To further reinforce security, administrators should also consider enabling two-factor authentication. A committed identity can be used to verify that you are the true account owner in the event that your account is compromised and/or you are unable to log in.

  Obituaries


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:36, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Tyreek Burwell

Hello SemiHypercube,

Why do you think that the content you restored belongs in that article? I read every one of the references about the alleged sister and none of them identify her as his sister. Not one. But even if she is his sister, why should Tyreek Burwell's brief biography report in great detail that his sister received probation after a fight that received press attention? Cullen328 Let's discuss it 17:20, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

@Cullen328: Ah. Now that you say it, it probably shouldn't be in the article, feel free to revert my edit. SemiHypercube 17:22, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
Please remember that when you restore deleted content, you are taking responsibility that the content complies with policies and guidelines. Thanks. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 17:34, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

17:33, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

20:35, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Closing ANI discussions

Hello, SemiHypercube,

Your help closing certain discussions on ANI is helpful but I wanted to encourage you not to be sarcastic in the summary that you offer. It's best, if possible, for all involved parties to finish a discussion feeling like they were heard. Leaving a message that can be seen as ridicule towards productive editors who come to ANI asking for help is not welcome. If editors need to post their queries at another noticeboard, they can be politely shown the way.

And if you are taking your cues from long-time administrators who can sometimes get snippy, just know that you will earn some latitude, too, after you've been here for 10 or 12 years. But as a new editor, it always helps to err towards politeness. Thanks again for your help at the dramaboards. Liz Read! Talk! 22:11, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

@Liz: Which closing statement do you mean? SemiHypercube 22:14, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Okay, let's see, I was thinking of this and especially this. I should say that my comment towards you was a response to editors saying that ANI is a very unfriendly place and your comments seemed a little dismissive. It's important to remember that many editors have little knowledge about the Wikipedia administrative space and may come to ANI to complain about a situation when they really need to go to a different noticeboard for content disputes or edit warring.
I did go back into the ANI archives and found other closings from you that were great, very neutral comments like "OP blocked by X for 24 hours" so I can see you are doing good work. I used to close ANI discussions before I was an admin and what I strove for was to simply sum up the action taken by an admin who had responded to the complaint or to state that there was no consensus in the discussion. It's my point of view but I try to avoid any language that reflects my own judgment of the worthiness of the complaint (even though some complaints might seem completely trivial and lame). There is no reason that editors looking for help should feel foolish.
I hope you do not feel singled out by my comment above. I was just struck by the tone of your closes and I didn't mean to make too much of it. In general, when I participate on ANI now I'm going to be more sensitive to the atmosphere and try to deescalate situations. ANI can seem like a circus (or the inquisition) and personally I'm going to work on making it a less hostile place.
I hope this answers your question and puts my comments in a larger context. Sorry for not noticing the ping earlier. Liz Read! Talk! 22:09, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
@Liz: Yeah, I understand, I forgot that other people don't interpret words with the same tone I had intended. SemiHypercube 22:14, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the positive attitude, SemiHypercube. Keep doing good work! Liz Read! Talk! 01:33, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

I don't know why you took the link out

If I'd come on that by accident I would have thought it was there intentionally. EEng 15:37, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

@EEng: For any possible talk page stalkers, see this edit for context. True...those are the presents under the hat. SemiHypercube 16:40, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

creation of new page describing Resideo

Hi! My draft was rejected with the feedback "Doesn't need to say so much about what it does"

I appreciate the feedback, but would like some help determining what exactly is too much. Trying to find the right balance between 'decriptive enough' and 'so much.'

Thank you in advance for some guidance on what to cut. Should I delete the part about the CEO and his quote about why the name is what it is?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Resideo#creation_of_new_page_describing_Resideo

999edits (talk) 13:27, 19 December 2018 (UTC) 999edits 12.19.2018

@999edits: The article just seems to mostly be about what they do, and not what others say about it (though with that, if reviews are used, both positive and negative reviews should be used) SemiHypercube 15:24, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

That's helpful, so I should include links to what investors and analysts are saying it as a business? Is that what you mean by what others say? In preparing this article I looked to other pages to model this entry, and when I look at pages like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trane and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honeywell I'm only seeing one instance that specifically is about what others say - in the Honeywell article, there are a few sentences about criticism of alleged tax issues and weapons manufacturing. As of now, there's not been public criticism of Resideo, as they've just spun off from Honeywell. The company is new but old in a sense, but as you may guess, mostly what's been said is on the investment side. Should I add a few lines about that? Thanks so much for your help!! 999edits (talk) 23:17, 19 December 2018 (UTC) 999edits 12.19.2018

Disambiguation link notification for December 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dermophis donaldtrumpi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Underground (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year

  Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello SemiHypercube, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019.
Happy editing,

Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 06:04, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Merry Christmas!

  Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello SemiHypercube, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019.
Happy editing,

Abelmoschus Esculentus talk / contribs 08:01, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Happy New Year!

 

Happy New Year!

Hello SemiHypercube: Thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia, and have a great New Year! Cheers, Abelmoschus Esculentus talk / contribs 05:43, 1 January 2019 (UTC)



Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year snowman}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.

Happy New Year SemiHypercube!

 
Happy New Year!
Hello SemiHypercube:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:31, 1 January 2019 (UTC)


 


Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks (static)}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Happy New Year, SemiHypercube!

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.


Administrators' newsletter – January 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2018).

  Guideline and policy news

  1. G14 (new): Disambiguation pages that disambiguate only zero or one existing pages are now covered under the new G14 criterion (discussion). This is {{db-disambig}}; the text is unchanged and candidates may be found in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as unnecessary disambiguation pages.
  2. R4 (new): Redirects in the file namespace (and no file links) that have the same name as a file or redirect at Commons are now covered under the new R4 criterion (discussion). This is {{db-redircom}}; the text is unchanged.
  3. G13 (expanded): Userspace drafts containing only the default Article Wizard text are now covered under G13 along with other drafts (discussion). Such blank drafts are now eligible after six months rather than one year, and taggers continue to use {{db-blankdraft}}.

  Technical news

  • Starting on December 13, the Wikimedia Foundation security team implemented new password policy and requirements. Privileged accounts (administrators, bureaucrats, checkusers, oversighters, interface administrators, bots, edit filter managers/helpers, template editors, et al.) must have a password at least 10 characters in length. All accounts must have a password:
  1. At least 8 characters in length
  2. Not in the 100,000 most popular passwords (defined by the Password Blacklist library)
  3. Different from their username
User accounts not meeting these requirements will be prompted to update their password accordingly. More information is available on MediaWiki.org.
  • Blocked administrators may now block the administrator that blocked them. This was done to mitigate the possibility that a compromised administrator account would block all other active administrators, complementing the removal of the ability to unblock oneself outside of self-imposed blocks. A request for comment is currently in progress to determine whether the blocking policy should be updated regarding this change.
  • {{Copyvio-revdel}} now has a link to open the history with the RevDel checkboxes already filled in.

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

  • Accounts continue to be compromised on a regular basis. Evidence shows this is entirely due to the accounts having the same password that was used on another website that suffered a data breach. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately.
  • Around 22% of admins have enabled two-factor authentication, up from 20% in June 2018. If you haven't already enabled it, please consider doing so. Regardless of whether you use 2FA, please practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:39, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

18:30, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

17:55, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

20:37, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Wrong information

I see that SemiHypercube change my amendments

So if there is any admin please change this :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crohn%27s_disease

Correct name of this disease is  :

,, Lesniowski-Crohn "


Mr Leśniowski was a Polish sciente who discovered this disease !

Antoni Leśniowski in 1904 first who public about this disease .

Not putting his name is like lieing that there is no Moon .

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.107.11.170 (talk) 17:08, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

That does seem to be right. Both names should probably be used in the article. SemiHypercube 17:53, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

18:15, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Neurodiversity does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing →   Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. You can't just hit revert or roll back without an explanation. Drmies (talk) 17:01, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

@Drmies: I would try to use edit summaries, but RTRC won't let you use Twinkle directly to make rollbacks with an edit summary. I'll try a bit more in the future. SemiHypercube 17:53, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks. In the meantime, I placed a block or two. Drmies (talk) 22:58, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

The reply-link newsletter, issue 1

Hi! Welcome to the new reply-link newsletter, which I made because the ol' list on the reply-link talk page was unwieldy. In case you haven't been following development recently, I've sent out some new updates that should let it reply basically anywhere, even in transcluded pages or under hatted discussions (two locations people have been wanting for a while). Reliability has also gone way up, as I've implemented a couple of sanity checks that help prevent the script from responding to the wrong message. Unfortunately, that means the script fails a bit more often. Anyway, try it out if you haven't done so in a while, and let me know what you think! I always appreciate feature requests or bug reports on the talk page. Happy replying! (Signup list/Unsubscribe) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:23, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2019).

 

  Administrator changes

  EnterpriseyJJMC89
  BorgQueen
  Harro5Jenks24GraftR. Baley

  Interface administrator changes

 Enterprisey

  Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment is currently open to reevaluate the activity requirements for administrators.
  • Administrators who are blocked have the technical ability to block the administrator who blocked their own account. A recent request for comment has amended the blocking policy to clarify that this ability should only be used in exceptional circumstances, such as account compromises, where there is a clear and immediate need.
  • A request for comment closed with a consensus in favor of deprecating The Sun as a permissible reference, and creating an edit filter to warn users who attempt to cite it.

  Technical news

  • A discussion regarding an overhaul of the format and appearance of Wikipedia:Requests for page protection is in progress (permalink). The proposed changes will make it easier to create requests for those who are not using Twinkle. The workflow for administrators at this venue will largely be unchanged. Additionally, there are plans to archive requests similar to how it is done at WP:PERM, where historical records are kept so that prior requests can more easily be searched for.

  Miscellaneous

  • Voting in the 2019 Steward elections will begin on 08 February 2019, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 28 February 2019, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
  • A new IRC bot is available that allows you to subscribe to notifications when specific filters are tripped. This requires that your IRC handle be identified.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:15, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

17:12, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Hey

I am your 30th talk page stalker, so you can finally get rid of the ugly sentence "Fewer than 30 watchers"   Abelmoschus Esculentus (talkcontribs) 04:12, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Evad

re: [28], Evad says in 1A:

I would apply for interface administrator, if successful with this RfA, so I could help with gadget and user js/css requests

Thought that might answer your question :) (not watching, please {{ping}} if needed) czar 01:04, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

@Czar: I figured it out, struck my question. SemiHypercube 01:07, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

18:45, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

23:13, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Talk to us about talking

Trizek (WMF) 15:08, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Yo Ho Ho

21:17, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Abelmoschus Esculentus' User Scripts

Dear all. Recently, our community lost a dedicated user, Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk). Among their projects were a number of user scripts that they left behind. I (DannyS712) have copied the scripts, and have taken over maintaining them. You currently import one or more of Abelmoschus Esculentus' scripts, and I thought that you might want to import a maintained version. Links to each script are provided below.

If you have any questions, please reach out and talk to me. --DannyS712 (talk) 00:30, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

@DannyS712: Thanks! Updated my common.js accordingly. SemiHypercube 12:24, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

16:38, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2019).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • A new tool is available to help determine if a given IP is an open proxy/VPN/webhost/compromised host.

  Arbitration

  • The Arbitration Committee announced two new OTRS queues. Both are meant solely for cases involving private information; other cases will continue to be handled at the appropriate venues (e.g., WP:COIN or WP:SPI).
    • paid-en-wp wikipedia.org has been set up to receive private evidence related to abusive paid editing.
    • checkuser-en-wp wikipedia.org has been set up to receive private requests for CheckUser. For instance, requests for IP block exemption for anonymous proxy editing should now be sent to this address instead of the functionaries-en list.

  Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

AIV

With ongoing ARBCOM restrictions (and given that 2 of my recent blocks, for right or wrong, are being challenged again at AE) I feel it best not to, sorry. GiantSnowman 14:36, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

I'm aware of ArbCom restrictions, but I just went to Recent Changes and went to the first admin I saw in a contribution. SemiHypercube 22:37, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

19:29, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Templates for discussion

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Templates for discussion. Legobot (talk) 04:48, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Ah! It's felt so long since I last got one of these messages! SemiHypercube 11:24, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
That's because the bot was broken until yesterday. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 11:37, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Template namespace

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Template namespace. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (people). Legobot (talk) 04:30, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

19:44, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Templates for discussion

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Templates for discussion. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Companion (Doctor Who)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Companion (Doctor Who). Legobot (talk) 04:32, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Draft: Mineplex

Hey, you left a comment on my draft saying it needs more reliable sources. I added a bunch more, and I think the article's pretty good now. Could you review it? Also, who's gonna create the page if it gets accepted? Sorry for the questions, I'm new to this whole draft thing. UnsignificantEditor (talk) 22:29, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

@UnsignificantEditor: The sources do seem better now. Additionally, if someone reviews and accepts the article, it will automatically be moved to mainspace. SemiHypercube 00:31, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Christchurch mosque shootings

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Christchurch mosque shootings. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

18:05, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (academics)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (academics). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion. Legobot (talk) 04:35, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

New Page: Cipher Knowledge 360

Hi SemiHyoercube!

I am interested in creating a new page that would fall under the Computing wiki project. It's a competitive intelligence program called Cipher. It's relatively new and has developed by Knowledge 360. I was hoping you would be able to offer me tips to make the page more successful from the start. Any insight you can give is appreciated! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lash975 (talkcontribs) 18:59, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Lash975, you may want to post your query at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computing, as I am not part of that project, and there are probably more experienced users there. SemiHypercube 19:05, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mobile country code

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mobile country code. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

16:29, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of 2017 albums

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of 2017 albums. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Voodoo Doughnut

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Voodoo Doughnut. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2019).

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

  • Two more administrator accounts were compromised. Evidence has shown that these attacks, like previous incidents, were due to reusing a password that was used on another website that suffered a data breach. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately. All admins are strongly encouraged to enable two-factor authentication, please consider doing so. Please always practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.
  • As a reminder, according to WP:NOQUORUM, administrators looking to close or relist an AfD should evaluate a nomination that has received few or no comments as if it were a proposed deletion (PROD) prior to determining whether it should be relisted.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:57, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

ANI

You are closing discussions too quickly at ANI. They continue after your closure. There is no hurry to close them and are supposed to stay open for twenty four hours. Regards. 2601:1C0:6D00:845:D66:D476:82CA:D7E9 (talk) 17:45, 8 April 2019 (UTC)