Open main menu

User talk:Prhartcom

Welcome! Please feel free to leave me a comment on any subject below. I look forward to replying to you. —Prhartcom

re Talk:Snowy (character)#Persistent vandalismEdit

Has there ever been an SPI on this? There is currently a three-month block on a recent IP, but the latest IP is a mobile so no point in reporting this one. Meters (talk) 22:37, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Asked for pending protection. More than 4 years of this stupidity... Meters (talk) 22:48, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello Meters, I see what you mean. I haven't been online lately and hadn't noticed; I appreciate your diligence. No, there has never been a sock puppet investigation; it would be great to launch one if you feel it would help end this. The vandal's IP address changes but always geolocates to the vicinity of Milford, Connecticut. For example, 68.191.55.129 did this vandalism and also vandalized many other articles, was warned, acknowledged the warnings, but was never blocked. Let me know if anything else can be done. —Prhartcom 12:50, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Precious anniversaryEdit

Precious
 
Six years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:26, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

User talk:Sebastian JamesEdit

I removed your comment. I already blocked that user for his incivility, so the matter has been addressed. Thank you, caknuck ° needs to be running more often 08:47, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Caknuck, thanks. I agree with your block reason for this person. People like that make one want to give up on this community. —Prhartcom 03:05, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Caknuck, by the way, it wasn't necessary for you to remove my comment without my permission. Don't do that again. —Prhartcom 04:53, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Yes it was necessary, as you were warning a user a) for an offense for which they had already been blocked, and b) that had taken place over a week prior. I am actively monitoring and trying to mediate this user's behavior. Your warning did nothing to improve the situation. In general, if an admin is taking ownership of a dispute or conflict in which you are not actively involved, then you should not inject yourself into the conversation. Period. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 23:48, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter messageEdit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Prhartcom".