PhilipBembridge

This user is forcing himself to go on a wikibreak, as his computer is making him fail his exams :-( This user will also miss you all until February (IF I keep to it lol) user page // talk page Sandbox • Guestbook Click here to leave a new message I don't Bite! Talking is nice, talking is how we solve problems together

Archives

• Archive

Re: Chinese history Why not go to read History of China and History of the People's Republic of China? They are different articles. I think that it's also good to keep the section of History in Agriculture in China and History of agriculture in the People's Republic of China separate. Please go to Talk:History of agriculture in the People's Republic of China, not my talk page, for discussion. Thanks. --Neo-Jay 15:59, 11 November 2007 (UTC) I think this is to avoid the confusion between i and j. Some western go board omit i, not j.--Neo-Jay 22:44, 11 November 2007 (UTC) Scout You are invited to participate in WikiProject Scouting, a project dedicated to developing and improving articles about Scouting. You may sign up at the project members page. WP:AFC Heya, noticed your "clerk note" on an AFC submission, and just thought I'd let you know we don't do clerk notes, or notes like that generally. I removed it and put it in the proper box at the top, if you need to see all the proper templates, they're located at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Templates, and the full instructions of how to review and asses/close submissions is here. :) Ariel♥Gold 20:12, 12 November 2007 (UTC) ah, thank you PhilB ~ T/C 20:15, 12 November 2007 (UTC) Anytime :) Good to see you around there! Ariel♥Gold 20:32, 12 November 2007 (UTC) Heya, I just removed another "comment" from an AFC, the submission was a request for a redirect, those don't require anything except to confirm that the subjects are related, and that the redirect makes sense under the Wikipedia:Redirect guideline (i.e. it is a likely search term). Also, could you please use the {{afc maybe|reason}} template when commenting, just because we don't use those "vote" symbols at AFC? That helps reviewers be able to see the grey boxes immediately to see what has been reviewed and what hasn't. Thanks dear! Ariel♥Gold 22:49, 15 November 2007 (UTC) Its kk! thanks for keeping me on the straight and narrow! PhilB ~ T/C 15:18, 16 November 2007 (UTC) Your userbox Hello! I have recieved your request for your usebox, and was wondering if this was okay? 'But...'This user always has to have the last word! If youwant me to change the colours etc. I will! you could then store it in your userspace. Reply here (on your talk page) or on this page: Wikipedia_talk:Userboxes/Ideas or on my talkpage I will get it whatever PhilB ~ T/C 14:39, 14 November 2007 (UTC) That looks absolutely fantastic! Thank you very much! MelicansMatkin 16:09, 14 November 2007 (UTC) You can find it at User:MelicansMatkin/userbox/Last word so you include it by typing: {{User:MelicansMatkin/userbox/Last word}} Added it to your profile, I also cleared up the code, the easiest way to get a user box table is to type {{userboxtop}} and {{userboxbottom}} and it puts them all in a table Hope I helped! PhilB ~ T/C 15:16, 15 November 2007 (UTC) Thanks so much! I'd thought that it seemed cluttered, but I wasn't sure how to make it less cluttered. Thanks again! MelicansMatkin 16:23, 15 November 2007 (UTC) Moved comments posted on User:Philipbemrbidge PhilB ~ T/C 15:10, 18 November 2007 (UTC) Userbox Hello! I have recieved your request for your usebox, and was wondering if this was okay? 'But...' This user always has to have the last word! If youwant me to change the colours etc. I will! you could then store it in your userspace. Reply here (on your talk page) or on this page: Wikipedia_talk:Userboxes/Ideas or on my talkpage I will get it whatever PhilB ~ T/C 14:39, 14 November 2007 (UTC) That looks absolutely fantastic! Thank you very much! MelicansMatkin 16:10, 14 November 2007 (UTC) RE: Dsylexia! :-( Your userbox links to the right page anyway so I can't see the point of Dsylexia. Also, articles in the main namespace are meant to be serious (humourous pages go into the Wikipedia namespace) and therefore it is being speedy deleted. ChrisDHDR 15:08, 18 November 2007 (UTC) Fine, leave it as a simple redirect??? ChrisDHDR 15:17, 18 November 2007 (UTC) PS:Removed the repeated comments (they stemmed from your change of username). Thanks PhilB ~ T/C 15:19, 18 November 2007 (UTC) Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Pioneer plaque.svg Hello, just to let you know that I have removed the "additional infomation" from the abovementioned featured picture nomination. The material already appears on the image page and ought to be condensed to the proposed caption. Thanks, -- Chris.B | talk 20:12, 18 November 2007 (UTC) Thanks I've never done one before PhilB ~ T/C 20:13, 18 November 2007 (UTC) No problem. -- Chris.B | talk 20:15, 18 November 2007 (UTC) Notice of request for deletion of editor PhilipBembridge :) PhilipBembridge, the editor you are, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that you satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space. Your opinions on yourself are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at User:R/EFD#PhilipBembridge and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit during the discussion but should not remove the editors for deletion template from the top of your userpage; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you, and have a good sense of humor :). Christmas Card Well, Phil, that is certainly a neat little card, I certainly do not mind; I'll keep it in mind if I want to make any cards in the future. Thanks for the Christmas card, by the way. Cheers to you!! --Zacharycrimsonwolf 14:38, 25 November 2007 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media (Image:Chiodos logo.jpg) Thanks for uploading Image:Chiodos logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:48, 22 January 2008 (UTC) peer review I was wondering if you could take some time out of your schedule to head over to the Heroes (TV series) talkpage and give us an honest peer review. The page has gone through some major changes in the last few months, and it would be fantastic if a prominent editor/contributor like yourself, could head over and give us at the Heroes Wikiproject some sound opinion and ideas on improvements for the page. We have all worked very hard at improving the page, and we need great outside, reliable and trustworthy users to come over and help us improve. I you are interested in joining the peer review discussion with other prominent users/contributors, much like yourself, please follow the link. Thank you very much for your help and your continued effort to improve Wikipedia and its quality! Wikipedia:Peer review/Heroes (TV series)/archive2--Chrisisinchrist (talk) 05:02, 3 February 2008 (UTC) WP:AFC Backlog Drive WikiProject Articles for creation needs your help! WikiProject Articles for creation has done a tremendous job in working at WP:AFC over the past 7½ months. Thank you all for your hard work and dedication! Together, we've made the submission process easier and more streamlined, developed tools to make the process go faster for reviewers, and cut the backlog down to a mere fraction of what it once was. Well done! As you all are aware, however, our work is not quite yet done. The project still has 10 archive pages left to complete, which include over half a month's worth of submissions, many of which have not been completely reviewed. We need your help to finish looking over these neglected submissions so that we can finally remove the backlog notice from the page, and put an end to the more than two year old backlog that has been a thorn in our side for ages! Participants will receive an AFC Barnstar, so hurry up and help out while there's still work to be done! Make sure to sign in on the WikiProject's talk page so we know who is involved in what promises to be our final effort to complete this goal. Thank you for all your help! - Happy editing as always, Hersfold (t/a/c) 16:29, 20 February 2008 (UTC) You are receiving this letter because you are listed as a participant in the Articles for creation WikiProject at WP:WPAFC. To avoid receiving further notices, please remove your name from the list. Thanks! MfD nomination of Image talk:Biological classification L Pengo.svg Image talk:Biological classification L Pengo.svg, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Image talk:Biological classification L Pengo.svg and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Image talk:Biological classification L Pengo.svg during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Phil B (talk) 16:24, 8 June 2008 (UTC) AfC news Dear AfC participant, Msgj and Tnxman307 are organising the AfC challenge! It's a little competition to help improve some of the articles created through AfC and we are hoping that everyone will get involved. For level 1, you just need to bring a stub up to Start-class. Level 2 is improving a Start-class article to C-class. And so on. To get involved or for more information please see the competition page. Those of you who haven't reviewed an article recently might not have noticed the new process that was implemented this year. Reviewing articles is now more enjoyable than ever :) You might like to give it a try. All articles waiting for review are in Category:Pending Afc requests. (Please read the updated instructions.) Please consider adding {{AFC status}} to your userpage to keep track of the number of articles waiting for review. At the time of writing we are officially backlogged, so help is needed! There is currently a proposal to bring the Images for upload process under the umbrella of WikiProject Articles for creation. The rationale is that both processes are designed to allow unregistered users to take part more fully in Wikipedia, and partipants in each process can probably help each other. If you no longer wish to receive messages from WikiProject Articles for creation, please remove your name from this list. Thank you. Help for template Hello, I've seen your name on the project template and I permis myself to ask you help: I've just created a new portal Portal:Lyon and I would like to create the templates for the subways, trams, bus. They already exist on the french wikipedia of Lyon metro for example. would you accept to help me ? Thank you Lulu97417 (talk) 16:39, 21 May 2009 (UTC) thank you! I appreciate your help and guidance. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tommybell56789 (talk • contribs) 15:52, 5 August 2009 (UTC) New Page Patrol survey New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello PhilipBembridge! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only.  If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 12:47, 26 October 2011 (UTC) Articles for Creation Appeal Articles for Creation urgently needs your help! Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 2401 submissions waiting to be reviewed. Do you have what it takes? Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines? Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not? Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions? Are you autoconfirmed? Can you review submissions based on their individual merits? If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. File:My wikipediholism test score.jpg listed for deletion A file that you uploaded or altered, File:My wikipediholism test score.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:24, 27 February 2012 (UTC) File permission problem with File:Adam Balon.JPG Thanks for uploading File:Adam Balon.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license. If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion. If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:36, 28 March 2012 (UTC) Articles for Creation Appeal Articles for Creation is backlogged and needs YOUR help! Articles for Creation is desperately in need of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors and administrators alike, to help us clear a record backlog of pending submissions. There is currently a significant backlog of 2401 submissions waiting to be reviewed. These submissions are generally from new editors who have never edited Wikipedia before. A prompt, constructive review of submissions could significantly editor retention. Do you have what it takes? Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines? Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not? Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions? Are you (at least) autoconfirmed? Can you review submissions based on their individual merits? If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. Click here to review to a random submissionArticle selected by erwin85's random article script on toolserver. We would greatly appreciate your help. Currently, only a small handful of users are reviewing articles. Any help, even if it's just 1 or 2 reviews, would be extremely beneficial. On behalf of the Articles for Creation project, AndrewN talk 23:53, 25 May 2012 (UTC) WikiProject Articles for creation newsletter Delivered 00:37, 18 December 2012 (UTC) by EdwardsBot. If you do not wish to receive this newsletter, please remove your name from the spamlist. Wikiproject Articles for creation Needs You! WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive! The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from March 1st, 2013 – March 31st, 2013. Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive. There is a backlog of over 2000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out! Delivered by User:EdwardsBot on behalf of Wikiproject Articles for Creation at 13:37, 27 February 2013 (UTC) WikiProject AFC needs your help... again WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive! The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from July 1st, 2013 – July 31st, 2013. Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive. There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out! A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code cleanup, and more page cleanups. If you want to see a full list of changes, go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Helper script/Development page. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. Delivered at 12:41, 19 June 2013 (UTC) by EdwardsBot (talk), on behalf of WikiProject AFC October 2013 AFC Backlog elimination drive WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive! The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 1st, 2013 – October 31st, 2013. Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive. There is a backlog of over 2400 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out! A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. --Mdann52talk to me! This newsletter was delivered on behalf of WPAFC by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:02, 30 September 2013 (UTC) ArbCom elections are now open! Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC) File permission problem with File:Richard Reed.jpg Thanks for uploading File:Richard Reed.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license. If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion. If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. mattbr 08:44, 28 August 2022 (UTC) File permission problem with File:Jon Wright.jpg Thanks for uploading File:Jon Wright.jpg, which you've attributed to Innocent Drinks. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license. If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion. If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:29, 25 December 2023 (UTC)