Welcome! edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page David Frawley, have removed content without a good reason to do so. Content on Wikipedia should not be removed just because you disagree with it or because you think it's wrong, unless the claim is not verifiable. Instead, you should consider expanding the article with noteworthy and verifiable information of your own, citing reliable sources when you do so. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! WikiLinuz🍁(talk) 00:38, 25 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

December 2021 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at David Frawley, you may be blocked from editing. WikiLinuz🍁(talk) 01:08, 25 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history at David Frawley shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. WikiLinuz🍁(talk) 01:12, 25 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at David Frawley. WikiLinuz🍁(talk) 02:12, 25 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. WikiLinuz🍁(talk) 01:20, 25 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Important notice and greetings edit

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

I have protected the page for now; if you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing without further warning.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:47, 25 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ok merry Christmas Peppergoat23 (talk) 02:55, 25 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Well, that didn't work as expected, sorry. I'll unprotect the page as a different solution has been applied per the notice below. This wasn't my idea; I'm out. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 03:03, 25 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

December 2021 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 02:54, 25 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Peppergoat account edit

Peppergoat (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Any discussion about the block should include a look at Special:Diff/981834375. Thanks to Bbb23 for noticing this. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:17, 25 December 2021 (UTC)Reply