Peasetort, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Peasetort! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:11, 1 March 2020 (UTC)


Welcome

edit
Hello Peasetort! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! --David Tornheim (talk) 11:27, 14 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

--David Tornheim (talk) 11:27, 14 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Notice

edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Marbury v. Madison; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --David Tornheim (talk) 11:28, 14 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Please note that when you request a change, you need to follow WP:BRD. If editors disagree, you need to discuss, not force your change on the article. If you can't find agreement with the editor reverting, then seek other non-involved editors to give feedback. I will comment on the section. --David Tornheim (talk) 11:31, 14 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi David, starting a discussion Is common sense stuff but WhiteWhirlwind wasn't interested. is there something else I can try? I've known bigshot named professors who tell every student they encounter that Wikipedia is shite over things like this.

Proposed deletion of Adam Matos

edit
 

The article Adam Matos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article describes a crime and subsequent trial. Although this drew the usual news coverage typical of such events, there is no evidence of wider or longer-lasting significance; this article on the convicted person falls under WP:1E / WP:CRIMINAL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllyD (talk) 06:57, 11 October 2020 (UTC)Reply