User talk:NuclearWarfare/Archive 3

Tucows/Boardtown Corporation

In all fairness, Boardtown Corporation does provide Platypus. Here: http://www.ispbilling.com/ I won't touch the page again, but if you feel like adding that, go for it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.152.112.187 (talk) 03:43, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Oh wow, it seemed so implausible to me. Sorry about that. Go ahead and add it. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 01:10, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

G2 or not G2?

That is the question.... LOL. Thanks for the heads up. It made no sense to me, but yes, other criteria would have been better. Change it if you will. Bearian (talk) 01:08, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

No problem. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 01:10, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

BO Sox Game

What happen to the Boston game yesterday? HairyPerry 16:11, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but do I know you? NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 21:34, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: New Page Patrolling

This is new information to me. Thanks! I'll try to work this into my routine from this point forward. - Vianello (talk) 01:26, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

• Although, for some reason, I can't seem to find the "mark this page as patrolled" link mentioned that's supposed to be in the lower right of the page. - Vianello (talk) 01:29, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

The "Mark as Patrolled" thing appears only if you enter via Special:NewPages. :) NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 01:36, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

• Oh, I see the problem now. I was doing that, but for some reason I was thinking a yellow mark meant patrolled, not UNpatrolled. This makes a great deal more sense now. Thanks! - Vianello (talk) 01:38, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

No problem! NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 01:52, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: New Page Patroller (Scapler)

Yes, though I marked as many pages as I could "patrolled", there were some pages where I did not feel I knew enough about the subjects to mark them one way or the other. I felt it was better to leave these as they were for others to take care of. Thank you for taking an interest though; new page patrolling is both useful and entertaining, isn't it though? Scapler (talk) 01:12, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Actually, in the page I noticed, you had marked it for speedy deletion but had not marked it as patrolled. But from your post, it seems that was an accidental one-time thing.

NPP is really interesting, I agree. I've just lost track with how many pages I've patrolled, but it must be at least 750 that I've tagged for deletion. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 01:15, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Yes, it must have been a one time mistake, sorry. Actually, it seems like I have had to mark pages as patrolled at least twice before they have shown up as marked on multiple occasions tonight. I wonder if there are glitches? Scapler (talk) 01:39, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Oh it's no problem, really. I personally have not had any problems tonight (though I'm not doing much NPP), but I do know that a wikicolleague has had trouble. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 01:42, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Well, out of many, many pages I have patrolled tonight, it has only been a problem with three or four, so it is really no big deal. (Just slightly, though only minimally, annoying, like a mosquito with a defective hematophagian technique)

Wikipedia tells me exactly what that is! NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 01:49, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, as a Floridian, I can't help but joke about Mosquitos. But hey, learning useless things is now so much easier with Wikipedia! Scapler (talk) 02:06, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Newbie Help

Hithere and thank you..i added a link to th "the Alchemyst, The Magician, The Sorceress" pages earlier tonight and also to the author's page. "Michael Scott" they have been removed and i have been asked not to re post them, i am brand new to this, if i did something wrong then i apologise, but they are not advertising..it is a book discussion forum which has been approved and sanctioned by the author, i have e mail proof of that request and there is proof on his website where he directs his traffic to come to this forum as it is the start of a full new fan site that is endorsed and participated in by the author..how can i change the decision? thank you for your time and advice :0) Zephfya (talk) 01:56, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Well, hi there, and welcome to Wikipedia. As a newcomer to Wikipedia, you are likely unfamiliar with several of Wikipedian policies, including this one. Now, you say that the author of the book wants to try to drive traffic to this new forum. Unfortunately, the kind of is the definition of advertising. Perhaps you want to familiarize yourself with this policy, and if you have any more questions, perhaps you could ask at WP:Help Desk.

If you feel, after all of this, that these links still merit inclusion, perhaps you want to try discussing it at the talk pages (go to the top of the article and hit the talk tab) of the articles. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 02:05, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you Nuclear I have read the rules that you have highlighted, i am sorry, i clearly did inadvertently break the rules! i will take it to the talk pages as you have suggested thank you very much for your help and advice Zephfya (talk) 02:14, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Sure, no problem. It's all right; we were all newcomers once. If you have any questions, feel free to come back to my talk page. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 02:16, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Newcomer Help

Thank you so much for your assistance, NuclearWarfare! I was pulling my hair out. I enjoy the newness of the experience but must admit to lacking patience. Your kindness (and willingness to step in so quickly) is most appreciated. 4mscollins (talk) 02:36, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Sure, no problem! If you ever have any questions, feel free to come back to my talk page or use the helpme tag. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 02:51, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Just wanted to say hi!

Hello, NuclearWarfare. I just wanted to give you a nod so you can finally know my username... I'm a good friend of Schzmo in real life. If you still don't know who I am, pop me an email so I can tell you. Oh, and good luck with your admin coaching! DARTH PANDA^talk 00:37, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I would be extremely interested in that article. Good to see you know who I am. Do you care if I mention you on my userpage as you have mentioned others and if I steal that awesome toolbar from your userpage? DARTH PANDA^talk 00:15, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Go ahead. In fact, I have to add you :) Oh and steal that toolbar. It is a tweaked version of User:Sephiroth BCR/Menu. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 00:18, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Cheers, and thanks! DARTH PANDA^talk 01:03, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Well, Huggle seems to be having issues with marking pages as patrolled. I can see it trying to do that on the bottom (in the log) but it always fails for some odd reason. Otherwise, I would be marking those pages. And I'd far rather be templated than rickrolled... It has less embarrassment. DARTH PANDA^talk 01:20, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Yea, no problem. I still have no clue what the error with the new page marking is, so I'm going to avoid it as much as possible from now on until I figure out the issue. DARTH PANDA^talk 00:27, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

I suppose you're right that I'll need that page, in fact I was about to use it... I thought it might be easier just to remove the whole thing altogether for now. DARTH PANDA^talk 00:29, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Not a big deal, but...

Please don't edit other users' comments. Thanks a lot. --John (talk) 22:51, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

I do know of that policy, but I felt that it was such an uncontroversial move that it would be OK to apply IAR and do it. It is not without great precedent; it is often done at RFA. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 23:17, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Race House

Why did you revert my edit to the Race House topic? All I did was add the coordinates for the house. Now, the latest edit to the topic added the coordinates as missing, even though they were there before you reverted the change. Maybe I did something wrong and would like to know what. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.245.66.244 (talk) 23:37, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

I doubt it was actually your fault. I reviewed my edits and cannot think of a logical reason why I did that. All I can do is revert my revert and offer you my fullest apologies. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 00:12, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

for reverting the vandalism to my user talk. DoubleBlue (Talk) 01:56, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

No problem :) NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 01:57, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Warning?

Why was I warned? I reverted the edits of the user User:AZT2008, who was just now blocked for doing so. I did not do anything to move these articles to the nonsensical articles that the other user was trying to edit. Jason (talk) 01:58, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

I accidentally warned you instead of him, and have already (prior to this post) removed that warning from your talk page. Twinkle targeted you with the speedy deletion notification template, so I just followed that. In any case, my apologies. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 02:00, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Oh, alright, I just now noticed that the messages were removed from my talk page. Apology accepted then I guess, hehe. Jason (talk) 02:03, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Request

Thanks for running the dates script on 2007 New England Patriots season. Could you also run it on the other articles in Category:New England Patriots seasons? Thanks. Pats1 ^T/C 21:12, 20 October 2008 (UTC)\

Sure thing. I'll fire up AWB and get started. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 21:21, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

 Done NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 21:39, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

?

Uhh, i alrdy changed my sig. Im lost II MusLiM HyBRiD II ^{ZOMG BBQ} 23:59, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

So you have. I did not see any of your new posts, but I did see one with your old signature and went immediately to your talk page. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 00:00, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Uhh... Okay II MusLiM HyBRiD II ^{ZOMG BBQ} 00:21, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks + question

Hello NuclearWarfare!

Thanks for your "welcome", for the cookies and for the help. I have a question regarding my user page. I have just put some stuff on my French Wikipedia user page ([[[1]]]). Mainly I put there some user boxes describing me. Is there a way for transferring these boxes or equivalent userboxes in my English Wikipedia page User:Nicodetr? Thanks. Regards,

--Nicodetr (talk) 16:05, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Unfortunately, there isn't, due to the way Wikipedia is coded. However, what you can do is redirect your English Wikipedia page to your French one. Add {{softredirect|fr:Utilisateur:Nicodetr}} to the top your userpage, and people will be given the option of clicking on the link to get to your French Userpage. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 21:27, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!--Nicodetr (talk) 00:17, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

HI again, I have one more question: I made changes in the pages ARNTL (see: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ARNTL&action=history), but I noticed too late that I wasn't logged in at the time I saved the changes. So my IP address is indicated in the History, instead of my user name. Is it possible to change this? I am talking of the change on Oct 20, at 21:44. Thanks! --Nicodetr (talk) 21:57, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

I'll see if I can get an admin to delete that revision. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 22:04, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Fixed! I got your IP's edit deleted and I manually readded your edit and attributed it to you. :) NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 22:15, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! --Nicodetr (talk) 00:45, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Nick_carson

Looks like we both had the same idea. Seeing that he's going to get dumped on by the "Opposse", he needs a few support votes. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:34, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

I always try to add moral support votes when I see SNOW RfAs. It is just too discouraging to the newbies otherwise, IMO. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 02:36, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Move

Hi NuclearWarfare, I was just wondering, why did you move the page House's Head to House's Head (House)?--Music26/11 16:08, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Well, I just felt that it would help organize things better if all of the episodes had a standardized naming system. While it may seem redundant, it also seems standardized to a newbie who comes here and wants to search for an episode name. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 20:30, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fernando Lembo di Pino

I see you've relisted this a second time. My inference is that if no-one gives enough of a toss to enter a debate, this merely underlines the subject's lack of notability. If no 'debate' ensues, what actually happens per WP guidelines?--Yumegusa (talk) 23:17, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

I'm willing to give this one last run and wait, then close as no consensus to delete, default to keep. Consensus at AfD means that people have to bring in good reasons to delete; otherwise it is kept. I can't quote any guidelines, but my idea seems like a reasonable interference. Anyway, that's just my idea. Do you have any other suggestions? NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 23:23, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Well I've just said what my inference is, and given you my reasoning, and you haven't offered any counter-interpretation. You say, "Consensus at AfD means that people have to bring in good reasons to delete; otherwise it is kept" but two editors have reached a consensus to delete, based on inability to establish notability. A (presumably) sole anon has been responsible for maintaining the article, which is way below WP standards in every respect; there appears to be no way to fix it without recourse to external sources, none of which exist. Seems to me that failing to delete such an article under these circumstances approaches irresponsible negligence.--Yumegusa (talk) 08:01, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

In that case, you should wait for a group of editors to come by and verify that fact, as is already happening. Just be patient, remember that that there is no deadline, and know that if the article is truly against Wikipedian policy, it will be deleted, even if it has to go through an extended AfD because AfD regulars have overlooked it. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 20:49, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Question

One of my edits was removed and considered vandilism because it contained an "inappropriate link". I would like to know why the link was considered inappropriate. All it was was a link to the book I was refering too. Please tell me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theonlyonethatmatters (talk • contribs)

It wasn't so much the link as the fact that you were inadvertently publicizing an external source. If you read that past link and still feel your edit was appropirate, perhaps you should bring it up on the talk page of Wood. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 20:46, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Question re: APICS The Association for Operations Management

The legal name of the organization is APICS The Association for Operations Management. The full, incorporated name is American Production and Inventory Control Society d/b/a APICS The Association for Operations Managment. The issue is that when we reincorporated, we had to modify the old name. Since the 1970s, however, no one has used the name American Production and Inventory Control Society.

I can provide a letter from the CEO if necessary to make the change. Since Wikipedia has this acronym policy, I would be fine with making the "APICS" page the main page and changing the title to "APICS The Association for Operations Management" and redirecting the "American Production and Inventory Control Society". Is that something we can do? --Opsman1952 (talk) 21:15, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Responded on your talk page. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 22:11, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

That works for us. How do I make that all happen? --Opsman1952 (talk) 13:30, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

I see you've already fixed this. Thank you kindly for your help on this! --Opsman1952 (talk) 13:41, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

AWB

I appreciate that you totally disagree with my approach to this, but you I please implore you to not make change like this using the tool? Because they are so minor and insignificant (compared even to the removal of a category), I'd suggest that they violate that 4th point you mentioned. WP:TFD and WP:IFD results often require removal of the relevant item, and it's along with this sort of task, along with article tagging runs/etc, that I'd imagine this sort of change should be made. Yes, it is over a longer period, but if the change is included into AWB's general fixes (if a strong consensus to change existing articles is shown to exist), it'll be done when nearly any user/bot runs a task. I hope this makes sense, and please do avoid making such small edits (if anything, it clogs up recent changes with many bot-like edits with no real change which might pose problems for RC patrollers) if at all possible. Thanks, Martinp23 23:45, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

I've reread some of Xenocidic's comments and have decided to reactive the "Skip if no typo fixed" option on AWB. This issue should not come up again :) NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 23:46, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

AfD closures

Please wait for five days before closing an AfD. I have noted that different AfD's you closed had not even run for four full days before you closed them. WP:DPR hgives more info on this. Fram (talk) 07:13, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

(Nearly) all of the AfDs I have closed have been under wp:snow rationales. Out of the ones I have closed recently, I can't think of a one that could have possibly closed differently. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 19:50, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shirts Versus Skins: closed after four days and six hours with three keeps (not a snow at all). Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/@$$ is closer to a snow (but if you close it as snow, then please indicate so in the closing statement), but closed after just less than four days. This, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin B, is from a cursory glance the worst: a weak keep closure after clearly a lot less than four days... Would the result have been different? Probably not, but why not wait at leat five days as proscribed in the policy? Fram (talk) 07:16, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

I really don't see what's wrong with those closures, but to err on the side of community friendship, I shall resolve to only close AfDs after 5 days have passed. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 18:54, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Page moves for episode articles

Why are you moving so many articles on television episodes in contravention to the guideline WP:TV-NAME? Jay32183 (talk) 09:42, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

It seems to me that I have done the opposite. As I see there, it says to move to pages like: "Lost (TV series), Survivor (TV series)", etc. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 18:57, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Also, putting it the way I did makes it so all the articles of a show have the same basic template name, making it easier for readers to navigate around. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 18:58, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

No, you've contradicted Wikipedia:Naming conventions (television)#Episode articles quite blatantly. The argument you're presenting here was shot down for being inconsistent with WP:NAME and WP:DAB, both of which say to use the simplest name. Jay32183 (talk) 00:19, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Woah there, I'm sorry. Feel free to revert me then. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 01:36, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

I didn't mean to imply you were being intentionally defiant. I was assuming a misunderstanding or misreading. I just wanted to make sure we wouldn't get into a move war. Jay32183 (talk) 03:14, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Oh, I have no intention of warring. If I do wish to change the titles in the future, I'll be sure to try to get the guidelines changed first. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 03:16, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Hey NuclearWarfare, thanks for bringing those fully prot'd articles to our attention at WP:RFPP, sometimes it is hard to ensure Wikipedia stays true to is values of being open for anyone to edit, so your edits are much appreciated! Tiptoety ^talk 03:55, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Sure, no problem! NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 04:05, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Avatar

I'd be more than willing to help. Just point me in the right direction. *SIGN* 21:15, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Essentially, take season 2 and go over and try to format it perfectly with season 1. Then, try to find information to put in the region 2 table. Then, with a couple rounds of copy editing, we should be fine. :) Then we will tackle season 3. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 14:10, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Nick Carr

Hi: The image is still acting up... under a new filename even.Manhattan Samurai (talk) 00:54, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. I will try there.Manhattan Samurai (talk) 01:01, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

User:Berig

I think you mean "Berig", not "Bering." If so, then yes, I can confirm that he used to edit under Wiglaf. Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 02:27, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Headdesks. Anyway, thank you :) NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 02:28, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Polish writer Filipiak

Took her sexual orientation from Polish Wiki, it fits well with her whole profile.--Revery (talk) 20:49, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

That works! NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 00:31, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

I've reverted your edit to the AWB mainpage pending conclusion of discussion

Hi, I have reverted your edit to the AWB mainpage pending conclusion of discussion at Wikipedia_talk:AutoWikiBrowser#Using_the_tool_for_inconsequential.2Fminor_edits. My feeling like you is that date delinking is a valid use of AWB, and I also think that the consensus will bear this out. Therefore, please accept my reversion of your changes to the AWB rules of use. After the discussion concludes the rules of use can be clarified. Thanks Rjwilmsi 21:07, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Sure, no problem :) The only place I've really seen this discussed is a recent conversation on User:Lightmouse's talk page, where there was, at the very least, no consensus for this (2 admins opposed, a bunch of lesser editors approved, and Martin threatened bans from AWB (though Lightmouse was partially at fault)) NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 00:21, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Your edit to Runnin' Wild (song)

I noticed in your edit to Runnin' Wild (song) that you have "fixed a typo". I just want to note that it was not a typo as the band's name is Airbourne (spelled with a "u"). --Lightsup55 ( T | C ) 04:58, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Oh, I'm sorry. I had thought I checked context, but apparently I failed at reading. Same applies for the other one down here. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 23:59, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Your edit to Depeche Mode discography

I noticed your edit to Depeche Mode discography last night. Some Bizzare is not a typo but the actual name of the label and associated album released in 1981. There is a picture of the album sleeve in the linked article. Perhaps it's not always a good idea to leave things to AWB? Best, Sunil060902 (talk) 12:05, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Oh, I'm sorry. I had thought I checked context, but apparently I failed at reading. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 23:59, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Your edit to Switchfoot

I noticed several of your recent message are about changing spelling that is not typos. Please make sure you check the context before using an automated tool to correct what appear to be errors. Maher-shalal-hashbaz (talk) 14:00, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Oh, I'm sorry. I had thought I checked context, but apparently I failed at reading. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 23:59, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

RfA

Hi NuclearWarfare! Thank you very much for your support and comments in the RfA. It passed today, and your trust in my abilities is much appreciated :) Cheers, Ynhockey ^(Talk) 21:41, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

NP NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 23:59, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

From Drunk redneck

Thanks for being nice about my redirection move and not being like those other bitchy users and deleting my work.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Drunk redneck (talk • contribs) 0:31, October 30, 2008

No problem. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 00:45, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Fixed the unsigned template. DARTH PANDA^duel 14:07, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

systolic geometry

Hi, thanks for your improvements there. However, the correct spelling is with a single "r" :) Katzmik (talk) 10:21, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Oh, I am sorry. It was a word that was unfamiliar to me, but now that I know, I shall be sure to avoid making that same mistake in the future. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 20:11, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Delinking dates with AWB

If you want to delink dates with AWB, just do a 'Make module' with:

• User:Lightmouse/javascript conversion/delink full years

If you want to delink dates and set them to dmy with AWB, use:

• User:Lightmouse/javascript conversion/dmy

It is easy to create another version that will do mdy. As you know, I am still banned but if you need help, let me know. Lightmouse (talk) 11:33, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

I've actually stolen those already, removed a few lines which I did not think needed to be removed (easter egg links) and created my own module, which I put right at User:NuclearWarfare/AWB/delinking dates. Do you think you can look that over please? NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 20:09, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

All female band list

Did you just give up? I would be willing to make the changes again however there has not been any consensus as to formating and wording. So far there is only my version for the guidlines for the list, a "guess" of the other editors version and nothing from you. Not sure where to take it next. Suggestions? Thanks Soundvisions1 (talk) 13:16, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

I, uh, forgot about it. NW headdesks. I shall go over there immediately and look over it. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 20:12, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Since there has been no response in two weeks from any opposition, I'd say feel free to go ahead and incorporate your ideas into the guidelines. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 20:13, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Date formats

Please do not change date formats on a whim. Unlinking dates is good work, but imposing your preferred date format on an article that consistently used a different standards-approved format is not. 165.189.91.148 (talk) 21:53, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

There was a rationale for this, for which I probably should have explained in my edit summary. The article was about an Indian chess player. India uses the dmy date formatting system. Therefore, the article should be in dmy. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 21:55, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

My Userpage

Thanks for the quick fix! I keep stealing stuff from your pages... Now I'm trying to get MizsaBot to clean for me. Heh... DARTH PANDA^duel 22:01, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

No problem :)I'm going to be bold and do the archiving bit for you. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 22:02, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

I'd prefer if you left it to the bot. I want it to be nice and clean... I tried it myself once, but humans just don't compare. DARTH PANDA^duel 22:10, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

I'm going to be bold and set up the archiving code for the bot, as I have done on my own talk page.* NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 22:11, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Eh? But isn't the code already there? DARTH PANDA^duel 22:14, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

:::::I had to edit some of it; you had part of the code wrong, I believe. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 22:36, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Trolls are awesome creatures. DARTH PANDA^duel 01:28, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Nah, Edison just linked wrong. The correct header would be Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe the Plumber (2nd nomination). DARTH PANDA^duel 03:19, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

I would do that, wouldn't I? Thanks for the script, I'll definitely be using it. I seem to be growing quite the collection over here... DARTH PANDA^duel 03:26, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

I'll consider it, but I don't feel the need to right at this moment. Thanks for the offer though! DARTH PANDA^duel 03:29, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

NP. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 03:35, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Diego Garcia

Sorry but how the...how was what I wrote vandalism? I was speaking the truth. If you support what the British/American government has done with regards to Diego Garcia then so be it but don't try and make out as if I vandalised the article when it's been all sugar-coated to make it look the British government 'legally' purchased the land! That's a blatant lie! Freedom of speech mate. Actually not even FOS, I know the 'real' history behind what's gone on there. I think you should do some research.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.163.105.233 (talk • contribs)

Actually, it is not the rest of wiki's buisness to do research. There are a couple of links you should look at. One is Wikipedia:Free speech, which explains wiki's policy on Freedom of Speech. The other is Wikipedia:Reliable sources. This says that anything that you write, especially contriversial issues, should be cited with reliable, third-party, published sources. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 00:24, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Avatar episode lists

Do you think it'd be a good idea to put the main list article at FLC while we wait for peer review activity on season 2? --haha169 (talk) 00:25, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Technically, that's not even allowed. We can wait for the peer review to end, or just terminate it and move right to FLC. Ask Rau J, I'm fine with either one. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 00:46, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

I don't think its not allowed to put one list on FLC while another goes through peer review. --haha169 (talk) 05:36, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Oh, you meant the main list article. Could you give me a day or so to redo the citations? After that it should be fine :) NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 20:10, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Sure thing. --haha169 (talk) 18:06, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Delinking dates

Edits like [2] leave a weird looking result where a single year is delinked in the middle of linked dates and years. Would it be possible to be more consistent with the used tools? PrimeHunter (talk) 01:21, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

That stream of edits was actually a preliminary run through to get a list for AWB. I am going back through and completing the task now :) NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 01:23, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. PrimeHunter (talk) 01:27, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Please note that, per the still open RFC at WT:MOSLINK, there is currently no consensus to de-link dates of birth and death. Use of tools to mass de-link such dates is therefore not appropriate. Jheald (talk) 19:12, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Oh, thank you for informing me of such. I'll take a look at it. Thanks. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 21:47, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Hello....

I edited an article, but am embarrassed to say that I didn't read the guidelines first, I apologize.

Where in the guidelines should I begin?

ICorinthians2.4-5 (talk) 23:32, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Hi there, and welcome to Wikipedia. There are a few things you ought to learn about Wikipedia. One is that reading the guidelines isn't really all that important. As long as you use some common sense as to what you should add, that should be enough.

However, don't think I'm not going to answer your question. I posted a link on your page with the links that will probably be most helpful to you :)

Cheers, and I hope you have fun editing. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 23:35, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

I hve been accused of vandelism...but I don't think that I did, could you help me in being more specific in what I have been accused of? What I said was the truth, and not derrogatory in any way that I'm aware of. Thanks ICorinthians2.4-5 (talk) 23:42, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Well, you are editing on a different account now. Could you perhaps link me to your old one? Or you could just let bygones be bygones, and drop the whole matter. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 23:43, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

I got it....I edited without logging in first, I clicked on the edit tab and it let me, so I thought that Wikipedia had somehow logged me in automatically. Sorry, I won't do it again. Thanks for your help. ICorinthians2.4-5 (talk) 23:50, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Nope, we just let all readers edit most pages :) Good luck on your wikitravels and be sure to edit constructively :) NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 23:51, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

copyediting

The lead looks fine to me. There might be some very fine details that need tweaking by someone who actually knows the show, but I don't see anything that stands out. [ roux ] [x] 03:08, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, that's all I was really looking for. User:Rau J had expressed some concerns that readers unfamiliar with the show wouldn't get some parts, but it seems not. Thanks :) NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 03:16, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Random Guy

Self-published sources may be used only in limited circumstances. I think that on that case almost the only way is to use the 'Self-published source' that is the apparition messages itself. I personally went to the place, I know the person who received the messages. I was there from 1999 to 2004. The site is online since June 1999. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tonyhenrique (talk • contribs)

But how is this guy that you are speaking of reliable? NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 01:57, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Hi it is not a Guy, it is a woman called Fabiana Oliveira. I put links that make reference from this apparition. http://paginas.terra.com.br/arte/leiame/brasil.html

Self-published sources may be used only in limited circumstances I think that Apparition can be considered a limited circumstance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tonyhenrique (talk • contribs) 02:02, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

What makes this a reliable source. At Wikipedia, we care about 'verifiability, not truth. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 13:30, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Elizabeth

Dear NuclearWarfare, 'Vandalism'??? Oh, no. Not at all! This 'Elizabeth' article is full of factuals errors and approximations. As a linguist specializing in onomastics, I DO intend to go rewriting this. It's full of absurd claims- one just can't leave it as it is. Yours: Elisabeth Cottier Fábián. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.230.17.245 (talk) 01:38, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Oh, well thank you then. It just looked to me as if you were removing content, but now I can thank you for your good work :) NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 01:39, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Edit to the Elisha Article

Sorry - no offense meant. I thought the article I linked was a good addition to the topic.

- Sean

Misterseanp (talk) 04:04, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Uh, OK. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 13:32, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Editing Tests

Where can i edit fun stuff and noit getr it deleted and dont say sand box —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yardey13 (talk • contribs) 13:39, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Nowhere besides the sandbox. This is a serious site; please try to respect it. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 13:41, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Simon Morris article

Dear Sir,

I am the legal advisor to Mr Simon Morris. I am very concerned that Wikipedia is being used as a propaganda source to discredit Mr Morris and his associates, rather than as the free source of encyclopedic information which it was designed for. I have continually made amendments to the article to reflect accurate provable facts, but continually am faced with others whom wish to replace fact with conjecture, opinion and assumptions. It wold appear that they consider Wikipedia to be more tabloid than enclyclopedic. I consider many of the comments inserted about mr Morris to be either untrue, innaccurate, misleading and/or even defamatory.

Please can someone contact me directly on <personal info removed> or by email on <personal info removed>?

Regards,

Paul Cooper Solicitor —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.152.49.135 (talk) 13:57, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

I'll be responding via the email address you sent me. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 14:04, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Oil pulling

Quite right too. But if you're watching this ghastly weakly-sourced article, why are you not doing something useful like improving it? 86.160.182.68 (talk) 03:07, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

I'm watching vandalism in general. Why don't you deal with it, please? Many hands make light work. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 03:33, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Wasn't it a 6 hour one

Lowest the new protect thing would let me do without typing one in - anyways, it's been resolved now so all is well -- Tawker (talk) 04:39, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

It is still semiprotected for another 17.3 hours... NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 04:40, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

If you look at the previous edits, Grawp hit it with a rotating IP. If he hit it every minute, and we got, say, 500 viewers a minute, around 300 may see the vandalized article. This way, hopefully, he tires out. I'd say this is a special case.

Oh, and you're looking at the full move protection. The semi is 45 minutes. Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :)} 04:42, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Ah, OK. I was indeed looking at the wrong end time. Thanks, MoP. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 04:44, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

No problem, and thanks for asking! :D Keep up the good work, Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :)} 04:47, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Euryalus#Discussion

NuclearWarfare,

I have accessed the deleted article and placed it in my userspace for people to view. This is Euryalus' version: User:Richardcavell/Roy Stewart (surfer). The most recent version, which was deleted, and for which Euryalus was not the most recent editor, is here: User:Richardcavell/Roy Stewart (surfer): Most recent version. It was deleted by Orangemike. - Richard Cavell (talk) 09:26, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 21:48, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which recently passed with 126 in support, 22 in opposition and 6 neutral votes. Thanks for your support in my RFA!! • If you want to reply to this message please use my talk page as watch listing about 150 pages is a bit messy • ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 19:41, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

for the bot NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 21:48, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Avatar peer review

Hello there my Airbending friend! A peer review is waiting for you here. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 19:39, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! That means a lot to me. I hope you find my suggestions helpful. The Avatar: The Last Airbender task force looks to be making steady progress. I understand some other editors may consider topics such as this irrelevant or unimportant but quality, incisive articles and lists are difficult to make when the topic lacks more in-depth research. Hopefully you can go some way towards providing an interesting and helpful resource for all. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 20:20, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Gave final status on the peer review page. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 21:48, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

I fixed a couple of minor errors in the article and a couple of auto-peer review fixes too. Hope you don't mind. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 22:23, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

I don't own anything, go right ahead! :) NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 22:35, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

User 65.3.135.194

It appears that both you and I have noticed that this user has continually removed the fictional mass murder category from many articles without discussing first on the talk page - it appears to be vandalism. I've left a warning on his page, but I'm not sure if you'd like to take further action or not. Thanks! Mononomic (talk) 00:43, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Well, I've already filed an wp:AIV request and I'm spamming it on IRC. Once he is blocked, I'll do a mass rollback of him. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 00:44, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Not to be dumb or anything, but what is a mass rollback and how does one do it? Mononomic (talk) 00:46, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

It just involves using the rollback tool (which you can get later if you are a good editor) to quickly revert the edits of a single user. It is very powerful and should only be used sparingly, however. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 00:47, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Buoyancy

Thanks for vandal-patrolling on Buoyancy, but I think your revert was a mistake. Pressure clearly doesn't increase with height above the surface of a liquid! User:66.153.159.170 actually tried to correct an earlier piece of vandalism that went unnoticed (done by User:68.228.14.27 on 6 October). I will amend the text to get it back to its original intent now. Would you be kind enough to drop a line to User Talk:66.153.159.170 and let him/her know they were right, please? --RexxS (talk) 04:09, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

It seems that I have forgotten my physics and chemistry classes. I just feel like a dunce right now, as I had actually looked into that edit.

I dropped a line to the IP, offering my apologies, and I offer the same to you. - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 04:14, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

No apology needed to me :) I've managed to sort the article (I think) and I'm sure the IP will be happy with your note. That article is a frequent target of vandals (for reasons I don't understand!) so your intent is appreciated. Cheers --RexxS (talk) 04:27, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks...

For the comment on use of G1. I think generally hit the mark on most reasons for deletion, but I am sure I miss on occasion.

As for marking as patrolled, I will only mark as patrolled those pages I am sure are valid. For example, if a page is for a CD and I am not familiar with the item, I will not mark as patrolled.

Thanks again...

ttonyb1 (talk) 20:33, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Well, if you have patrolled and tagged it, an admin will look it over anyway. So just be sure to mark all of the new pages that you tag for speedy deletion as patrolled.

G1 is to generally only be used for things like "ASJDHASFJDSHDAlol12378123sfduio". If you have a special case that doesn't fit any, consider using the prod templates or sending it to XfD instead. - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 20:55, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks...ttonyb1 (talk) 22:45, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Teardrop

I simply added the length of the CD. I did nothing wrong. I was helping. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.186.33.209 (talk) 02:23, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

You changed the length of the song from what it should be to a different one. It is one of my favorite songs, so I know the appropriate time length, and I even double-checked it. If you have alternate information, please feel free to add a source. - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 02:27, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

I love Massive Attack, and I own the 12in vinyl copy of the single. There are 4 tracks on the single itself. If the page is for the song itself, and not the single, I apologize. I'm not one to vandalize. I appreciate the work you're doing. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.186.33.209 (talk) 02:37, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Ah, OK. That makes perfect sense and I'll believe you. That page was indeed for the song itself. There is a subsection of the page for the CD itself (yeah, makes no sense to me) on Teardrop (song) though. Feel free to add your information in in prose.

I'm Sorry

my b

Just please don't do it again, and all will be forgiven. Thank you. - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 02:46, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Who are you again?

I'm just a user who likes to spend his time adding to sum total of human knowledge (click on the link). You too can help. - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 02:52, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

That sounds...smart.

Thank you? - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 02:54, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

No problemo Charles the elephant:)

? 02:55, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

That's spanish for No problem Charles the elephant.

I understood that.

Good night. - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 02:57, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

You are boring me. Good day, sir. I said good day!

Report of one of my reverts

Why did you remove what i wrote in Workchoices?

Hi there. I assume you are referring to this edit. I reverted it for the reason that I explained in my edit summary. The information is dubious and uncited. Also, it fails the neutral POV test. Please see the reliable sources guideline as further reason why I removed it. - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 02:46, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

(I had rvved the removal of an AfD notice, and this user came to ask about it)

Thanks for caring and everything but uhh dont. The page does not need to be deleted and I dont know anyother way to fix that other than getting rid of that warning junk. So find someone else to bother alright?

If you feel it shouldn't be deleted, follow the link on it and comment in the 5-day discussion that must take place. - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 03:06, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Trying to resolve...

...a copyright issue.

They are the group that deals with copyright issues. Send them an email. - NuclearWarfare contact meMy work 03:22, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

  Thanks. I can find no link or information on the page that provides necessary eMail information. "Contact Us" just links to other Wiki pages, and so on...

How else can they be contacted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gem555 (talk • contribs) 03:42, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Oh, replying on your page, one second. - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 03:43, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

RE: Neutrality on Federal Reserve page

Indeed. So, I corrected the blatant bias on said page. When one is sighting a source that clearly describes a historical fact, I find it a great disservice to other users to omit so much of the sources material that an entirely different message is conveyed. Statements of fact will inherently hold a position, sir. Sorry to disappoint you. Maybe you should actually read the source material, for verification, of course, before contacting me next time.

Thank you for your consideration,

Closer71

Please be more civil. In addition, if you feel that your change is correct, please feel free to discuss it on the talk page. But perhaps you should cite some sources. Most reliable sources call the Fed a quasi public system, so that is what we use at Wikipedia. - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 03:00, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the revert

Cheers. What he said was really mean :( Heh :p Gary King (talk) 04:04, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Oh, don't listen to him :)

No problem though. Anytime you need it ;) - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 04:05, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

New page patrol marking, G1, etc.

Two issues:

1. As I have written on multiple occasions when someone tags my user talk page with this issue: I use Twinkle for new-page patrol, and when I tag a page using Twinkle, it removes the mark-as-patrolled link. This forces me to navigate back to the article and attempt to mark it, by which time it is often already deleted or marked. I am told that Twinkle is supposed to have this fixed Real Soon Now, but you know how that sort of thing goes.
2. The nonsense tag on the article you noted seemed to be the closest criterion match, as the article had nothing to do with the title. I suppose vandalism could have been cited as well. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 05:03, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

The issue is really easy to solve. I use Twinkle as well for patrolling new pages, and I have no problem. First, when you open a new page, open it in a new tab. Then tag it for speedy deletion if it clearly meets the criteria and before the page reloads, scroll down to the bottom of the page and click on Mark as Patrolled. With Twinkle's lag in refreshing (~5 sec), you should have no problem with this.

Yeah, tried that. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. Ends up being more trouble than it's worth. Been doing new-page patrol for about two years or so, and have yet to consistently be able to hit it that way. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 13:51, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

The G1 criteria (nonsense) is to only be used in very limited situations, where a bunch of random text is placed down like: "hasdasdhjasdhjasd." Otherwuse, just use the other criteria that are designed for this (g2, g3, g10, a1, a7, etc.) - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 05:08, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

In theory, maybe, but I think G1 gets used a little more broadly than that in practice. As I said, I've been doing new-page patrol quite a while now, and I think I can count on one hand the times that an admin has declined a G1 speedy request of mine when the article wasn't just random characters. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 13:51, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

We should try to stick to theory if at all possible though. I can't think of any reason where an article would need to be speedily deleted if it does not fall under the normal criteria. Can you not just do the regular way, please? - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 19:57, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Regarding: New Page Patrolling

Thanks, I actually thought that when you tagged an article for deletion, it was automatically marked as "patrolled." My mistake...Ill make sure to mark them in the future, thanks. --The Original Editor (talk) 17:47, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 19:58, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Editing headers

Hey, I noticed you gained a header after a user clicks "edit this page" on either your user page or your discussion page. That has intrigued me for some while, and the user who I was going to steal borrow the code from quit, so care to enlighten me? DARTH PANDA^duel 21:09, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

It was actually a really cool thing that I noticed while browsing. Edit User:Darth Panda/Editnotice for the userpage, and the talk page of that for your main talk page. If you want to see mine, it is at User:NuclearWarfare/Editnotice. - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 21:19, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Followup: Would you happen to be talking about User:Roux, by any chance? - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 00:10, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Yessir, that's the user. And don't vandalize. You should know better! DARTH PANDA^duel 01:04, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

*Beats with vandal stick*. DARTH PANDA^duel 01:30, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

*Promotes himself to steward and deletes your account :P* - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 01:41, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Owned by the wikisymbol *. Fix that, it looks terrible. DARTH PANDA^duel 02:15, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

/me has no idea what you are talking about. And didn't I just delete you, puny Wookie? - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 02:20, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

You're insulting your own Star Wars nerdiness by calling me a Wookie. DARTH PANDA^duel 02:22, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

"Go away"

If he would tell me what needs improvement then I would, but he hasn't. Aboutmovies (talk) 10:23, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

There is no need to force a controversy. Just find another user if you have to. - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 23:29, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: Roux's departure

Thanks for informing me. I would however consider removing the quoted email. I know Roux has left but some of the statements made are blockworthy...Regards, --Cameron* 13:06, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Dude, the user has left and the userpage has been deleted. His emotions are probably running very high right now; there is no reason to piss him off anymore. - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 23:32, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Elah

Haven't a clue what you are talking about. Are you trying to be ignorant on purpose? You should stop annoying people for no reason. 62.64.207.168 (talk) 23:40, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Oh, I'm sorry. I accidentally misclicked and didn't notice it. Please accept my apologies (Also, don't forget to be civil. I'm truly sorry for reverting your good faith edit. - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 23:41, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Apology accepted. Sorry, it felt like you were defending an edit by bullying/sarcasm. Happy editing! 62.64.207.168 (talk) 23:44, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Oreo History Edit.

I am just wondering why you chose to Take away My edit Of the page Oreo, where i said Chips Ahoy! had already marketed in the UK and You claimed it was Vandalism? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.1.171.32 (talk) 23:53, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

A: I did not claim it was vandalism

B: You had not provided a source (though it is not always required). That, coupled with the odd way you decided to insert your information in the article (with a nota bene and before a citation needed tag) caused me to think you were just testing the Wikipedia system. If you believe you edit was correct, could you just add a link to backup your claim next time (In brackets please). Thanks! - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 23:57, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Falcon Football Club

Please do not change this page, as it is only meant to be read by our club. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DunnyGunner (talk • contribs) 00:30, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but Wikipedia is not your own personal hosting site. Please find a different one. - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 00:32, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

UBX

Can you see if you can shrink the size of User:Ctjf83/BudSelect? It is a little big, shrink it a little bit, please! Thanks! CTJF83Talk 03:11, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Done - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 18:38, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the support!

Thanks for supporting me at my successful Rfa! Hope to work with you in the future!--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 17:29, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

- NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 18:38, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Clearing Cookies Fixed it

Recently, you helped me with a problem with things appearing on a Wikipedia page when it shouldn't have. You suggested that I clear my cookies and that fixed it. Thank you. -Thunderforge (talk) 23:56, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

No problem :) Sometimes, the simplest answer is the one that seems obvious in hindsight :D Have fun in your wikitravels. - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 23:57, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

symbols

Just a reminder that we don'tcustomarily use symbols at AfD debates -- just bold face keep or deletes. DGG (talk) 04:22, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

I was using a script to do my discussion from the day's log page without having to open up the subpage. I'll hunt down the author of the script and have him change it. Sorry about that. - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 04:28, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

A report on one of my reversions

Hi why did you remove what i wrote on workchoices? i was involved in the ACTU your rights at work etc?

I had the same thing. You said my test of the edit on Petra worked and had been removed. What does this mean? my test? I just removed something about ninjas and king awesome pants which didn't belong there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeepenator (talk • contribs) 20:36, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Um, I have no idea what you mean, as your account history has no past history besides this post on my talk page. - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 22:27, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

I found what you meant. Since we edited at similar times, it is likely that I reverted you at close to the time that we were reverting the vandalism. I'm sorry. Please accept my apologies. - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 22:29, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

I was on a generic IP and created a username to specify what changes I make from others on my IP. There was a message from your username NuclearWarfare saying the test of my edit on Petra worked and had been removed. I looked in the history on Petra and you removed my changes I made. Just wondering what the "test" was and why my edit was removed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeepenator (talk • contribs) 22:31, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Gotcha... no prob. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeepenator (talk • contribs) 22:32, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Apolinario Mabini went to the University of Santo Tomas

Hi I just noticed you undid an edit about Apolinario Mabini going to Our Lady of Perpetual Succor College, not the University of Santo Tomas. And then you undid your won undo. The sources do indicate Mabini did indeed go to UST, not OLOPSC. I've made the correction, but I'd like to give you a heads up, as well as inquire why you hesitated. :-D Just as a matter of curiosity. -- Alternativity (talk) 18:02, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

I'm actually not sure what you mean. I can't find the edit that you describe. - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 22:26, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Oh. It's at [3] (Sorry, don't know how to create a link to an old edit). By reverting your own edit (as your summary indicated), it went back to 122.2.112.212's Our Lady of Perpetual Succor College, when it should be University of Santo Tomas. :-D -- Alternativity (talk) 04:28, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Ah, ok. At that time, I was on a vandal-hunting spree. I remember seeing that edit, reverting it, and being unsure if it was really an unconstructive edit. I erred on the side of not biting the newbie, and I reverted. Glad to see that you followed up on it though; Thanks :D!

Also, I don't believe there is any way to interlink to a "diff". Using the direct link is fine. - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 04:32, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

1983

Hi, I saw your edit to the FAC for 1983 Atlantic hurricane season, the main contributor had given a comment and I have wondered if you have seen it.--Neka 2008! 00:14, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Yep, I responded on the FLC. - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 00:24, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Bug 16085

I notice you opposed based on the bug and would like your opinion on the validity of it. To keep discussions centralised, I have started a discussion here. Hopefully we can together establish consensus one way or another. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 12:06, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Replied. Thanks for notifying me. - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 22:58, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 17, 2008 and before.

Because the Signpost hasn't been sent in a while, to save space, I've condensed all seven issues that were not sent into this archive. Only the three issues from November are below.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 42	8 November 2008	About the Signpost

From the editor
News and notes: The Price is Right, milestones	Dispatches: Halloween Main Page contest generates new article content
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 43	10 November 2008	About the Signpost

Fundraiser opens: Over $500,000 raised in first week	ArbCom elections: Nominations open
Book review: How Wikipedia Works	MediaWiki search engine improved
Four Board resolutions, including financials, approved	News and notes: Vietnamese Wiki Day
Dispatches: Historic election proves groundbreaking on the Main Page	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 44	17 November 2008	About the Signpost

Lawsuit briefly shuts down Wikipedia.de	GFDL 1.3 released, will allow Wikimedia migration to Creative Commons license
Wikimedia Events Roundup	News and notes: Fundraiser, List Summary Service, milestones
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:22, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Sigging for the bot - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 22:58, 23 November 2008 (UTC)