NFLjunkie22

Other notable quarterbacks Reply

Hi Junkie - When this page was being developed, this list became to long. While we kept the first 50 qbs regardless of win-loss record, the second list had to be shortened to keep to Wikipedia standards. Please read qualifications at top of second list. Quote "This list includes NFL quarterbacks who either 1.Are in the Hall of Fame or 2.Have achieved 35+ wins and a .500+ winning percentage. Stafford does not qualify. Please do not include him till he hits the top 50 (like Carson Palmer did} or his record improves. Thanks Spparky (talk) 22:04, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Edit War Warning

Your recent editing history at Zara Larsson shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jith12 (talk) 19:01, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

?? what's this for?? i haven't been editing the page recently. NFLjunkie22 (talk) 22:20, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

It refers to your edits yesterday, when you could've been blocked for your four reverts ([1] [2] [3] [4]) to Zara Larsson. You'd previously been warned ([5]) about edit warring. —C.Fred (talk) 22:56, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

And given that some of your prior reverts were to add a link to Misandry into the article, this edit is really borderline. —C.Fred (talk) 23:11, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

why? she's a grownup and described herself quite directly as a man hater. which is a misandrist. NFLjunkie22 (talk) 11:03, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Your most recent edit on Zara Larsson could be your 6th revert. Please voice your opinion as to why a link to misandry should be added to the words "man-hater" or anything else to do with misandry should be added to the article on the talk page. Also, that edit violates WP:MOS#Linking. Please do not change anything until we reach consensus. Thank you, Jith12 (talk) 15:34, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

A beer for you!

I think you need this in light of all that's been going on over at the Larsson page! ENJOY!!! Peace, bro. Maineartists (talk) 23:12, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Note: the thread is NFLjunkie22 reported by User:Jim1138 (Result: )Jim1138 (talk) 19:50, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions notice - Gender

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--slakr^\ talk / 03:57, 5 December 2016 (UTC)