Leave edit

Well this is unexpected, but I'm sure you have for reasons and hope to see you back here soon. Croat Canuck Go Leafs Go 19:32, 3 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

I just came here after reading Fighting in ice hockey again, because it is going to be in the main page soon. I just wanted to say the work you did on that article was great, you should be very proud of it. I never contacted you (other than replying to a Peer Review), but I did not want to miss a chance to give you recognition which you deserve. I hope you come back soon from your wikibreak, because Wikipedia needs more editors like you. Thank you.--Serte Talk · Contrib ] 22:03, 15 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Biography Newsletter 5 edit

To receive this newsletter in the future, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 15:50, 7 October 2007 (UTC) .Reply

Randall Flagg edit

I'm trying to get Randall Flagg's article to either GA or FA status. I've put a lot of effort in the article in the last couple of weeks, expanding and reworking various sections along with adding sources and external information such as quotes and analysis. I put it up for peer review at Wikipedia:Peer review/Randall Flagg. Any suggestions you have would be welcome.--CyberGhostface 18:27, 24 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

League of Copyeditors roll call edit

  Greetings from the League of Copyeditors. Your name is listed on our members page, but we are unsure how many of the people listed there are still active contributors to the League's activities. If you are still interested in participating in the work of the League, please follow the instructions at the members page to add your name to the active members list. Once you have done that, you might want to familiarise yourself with the new requests system, which has replaced the old /proofreading subpage. As the old system is now deprecated, the main efforts of the League should be to clear the substantial backlog which still exists there.
The League's services are in as high demand as ever, as evinced by the increasing backlog on our requests pages, both old and new. While FA and GA reviewers regularly praise the League's contributions to reviewed articles, we remain perennially understaffed. Fulfilling requests to polish the prose of Wikipedia's highest-profile articles is a way that editors can make a very noticeable difference to the appearance of the encyclopedia. On behalf of the League, if you do consider yourself to have left, I hope you will consider rejoining; if you consider yourself inactive, I hope you will consider returning to respond to just one request per week, or as many as you can manage. Merry Christmas and happy editing, The League of Copyeditors.

MelonBot (STOP!) 18:12, 28 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Randall Flagg is now a Good Article edit

Just thought you'd like to know that Randall Flagg has now passed Good article status.--CyberGhostface (talk) 02:22, 29 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

New department in Dark Tower WP edit

I see you're on a wikibreak, but I just wanted to inform you that there's now an article of focus section for the project --MwNNrules (talk) 18:58, 2 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Second nomination is up. --MwNNrules (talk) 07:29, 8 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Dark Tower WP discussion edit

Greetings Dark Tower WikiProject member, I would like to invite you to palaver about a possible expansion of the Dark Tower Project to include all Stephen King related items. I feel that the large amount of projects related to the author warrants his own Project—but as this one already exists—hesitate to begin a new one. Please feel free to leave comments of any kind and be assured that The Dark Tower will be held in the highest regard within the new King Project. Long days and pleasant nights. Blackngold29 02:46, 26 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Belgian ice hockey personnel edit

 

Category:Belgian ice hockey personnel, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 22:38, 23 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject The Dark Tower edit

Wikipedia:WikiProject The Dark Tower, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject The Dark Tower and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject The Dark Tower during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JJ98 (Talk) 02:57, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

FAR edit

I have nominated Fighting in ice hockey for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.--Jarodalien (talk) 16:56, 15 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Category:The Dark Tower locations has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:The Dark Tower locations, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TTN (talk) 01:32, 4 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Deletion pending for File:Linnzi Zaorski.jpg edit

Hello, Mus Musculus. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Linnzi Zaorski.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

  • If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.
  • If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 15:43, 4 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Wagsr.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Wagsr.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:23, 5 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

You have been pruned from a list edit

Hi Mus Musculus! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:01, 27 June 2022 (UTC)Reply