Open main menu

User talk:MSN12102001

Welcome!Edit

 
Some cookies to welcome you!  

Welcome to Wikipedia, MSN12102001! Thank you for your contributions. I am SkyGazer 512 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 16:25, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

94th Academy Awards moved to draftspaceEdit

An article you recently created, 94th Academy Awards, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:46, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

CASSIOPEIA, Updated MSN12102001 (talk) 12:42, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi MSN12102001, Thank you for providing the source, we need at least 2 more (the lowest number of significant coverage) independent reliable source of rboth 943 and 94 academy awards. Sources from major newspaper would be good. If you can fight such sources, it means the articles are created WP:TOOSOON. Pl see WP:GOLDENRULE. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:49, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello CASSIOPEIA, I added two more references, both in the Oscar 2021 and also in the Oscar 2022. I hope it is now correct. Graciously, MSN12102001 (talk) 13:05, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi MSN12102001, OK thank you. Pls click the submit button. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:15, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi MSN12102001, Reviewed and thank you for your contribution. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:25, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

93rd Academy Awards moved to draftspaceEdit

An article you recently created, 93rd Academy Awards, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:46, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

CASSIOPEIA, Updated MSN12102001 (talk) 12:43, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 93rd Academy Awards has been acceptedEdit

93rd Academy Awards, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:19, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 94th Academy Awards has been acceptedEdit

94th Academy Awards, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:22, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

ITN recognition for 2019 FIFA Women's World CupEdit

 On 7 July 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2019 FIFA Women's World Cup, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

StudiesWorld (talk) 18:48, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Avengers: EndgameEdit

 On 22 July 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Avengers: Endgame, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

Yogwi21 (talk) 03:59, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019Edit

Your recent editing history at Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. StudiesWorld (talk) 17:52, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

@StudiesWorld: I didn't make those editions with malicious intent. I did them only because there are editors who are still voting (as I wrote in the summary), but the editor already wants to close it without reaching a consensus. Haste makes waste. MSN12102001 (talk) 18:00, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
I understand that's how you see it. However, both of you are edit warring over the header. If it continues, I will bring it up at WP:ANEW. StudiesWorld (talk) 18:05, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
@StudiesWorld: Ok, I already stopped. Thanks for the warning. Good work! MSN12102001 (talk) 18:16, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

On pages movesEdit

Where there is a requested move tag as there was on the 2019 Brazil wildfires page, you should not move the page until the requested move discussion is closed. I wouldn't go and move it back since it likely will close that way, but there is a process to be followed here. --Masem (t) 14:14, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Suicide bombingsEdit

You have recently created Category:Suicide bombings in 2019. There is no such category tree. Are you planning to build one or should the category be merged to its parents? Dimadick (talk) 07:44, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "MSN12102001".