User talk:Lee Vilenski/Archives/2018/March
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hii Lee Vilenski. Can you review my Draft:Bisen. It is pending for approval. Atrisomkshraj (talk) 08:43, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Atrisomkshraj. My area doesn't really cover tribes and clans, but I'd be rejecting the article. You need to pass WP:GNG, so you need to increase the amount of references on the topic. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:51, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the Information Lee Vilenski. I will try my best. Atrisomkshraj (talk) 08:54, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
- Have a look at Katoch. That's a decent article for the same genre. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 09:07, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
12:52:28, 1 March 2018 review of submission by ObservationMt
I thought you will decline it because it is too short. But that the reason us it was too homorous, that suprized me. Maybe you refer to the Motor coordination link. That was there by purpouse. Ido Portal is a teacher of "movement" in the sense of moving your body, moving your spine, connecting movements into waves. I thought Motor coordiation is exactly it. Additionaly there is no article on Wiki about body movement.
ObservationMt (talk) 12:52, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
WikiCup 2018 March newsletter
And so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. With 53 contestants qualifying, the groups for round 2 are slightly smaller than usual, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining users.
Our top scorers in round 1 were:
Aoba47 led the field with a featured article, 8 good articles and 42 GARs, giving a total of 666 points.
FrB.TG , a WikiCup newcomer, came next with 600 points, gained from a featured article and masses of bonus points.
Ssven2, another WikiCup newcomer, was in third place with 403 points, garnered from a featured article, a featured list, a good article and twelve GARs.- Ceranthor, Numerounovedant,
Carbrera, 
Farang Rak Tham and 
Cartoon network freak all had over 200 points, but like all the other contestants, now have to start again from scratch. A good achievement was the 193 GARs performed by WikiCup contestants, comparing very favourably with the 54 GAs they achieved.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.
If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) and Vanamonde (talk) 15:27, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Wheels of Aurelia
 | Hello, Lee Vilenski. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Wheels of Aurelia at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 03:15, 6 March 2018 (UTC) |
- Thank you so much Baffle_gab1978, you guys really are the best. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:26, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Virtual Pool 1 Screenshot.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Virtual Pool 1 Screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
Your GA nomination of Eddie Ryan (wrestler)
The article Eddie Ryan (wrestler) you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:Eddie Ryan (wrestler) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HHH Pedrigree -- HHH Pedrigree (talk) 17:01, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Johnny Kidd Stretching Ultimo Dragon.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Johnny Kidd Stretching Ultimo Dragon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:22, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
Request on 06:37:19, 12 March 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by StephenFBanham
Hi Lee,
Thank you for your review of my article. The quotes are directly from the published play. Can this be solved with a single reference or footnote, or should it be a reference for each individual quote?
As for the pictures, many other theatrical articles on Wikipedia do have production pictures set out in this way, so I'd like to keep them up if possible. They've all been sourced with permission from the company.
Thanks. (StephenFBanham (talk) 06:37, 12 March 2018 (UTC))
- StephenFBanham - All quotes should be sourced. You can cite a source more than once however. See WP:CITE.
I'm not really too knowledgable regarding theatre articles, I did do a quick search, but didn't find much. Could you give me an example? Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 11:29, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for your reply. The quotes are easily fixed.
I used this article as a general guide: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lion_King_(musical) but you can also check out classic plays like 'Cat on a Hot Tin Roof' or 'Zoo Story'. Or some of the Shakespearean ones. Where copyright allows, Wikipdia will have production images, cover images and/or images of posters and theatrical programs. (StephenFBanham (talk) 05:10, 17 March 2018 (UTC))
I've now added those citations. (StephenFBanham (talk) 10:26, 18 March 2018 (UTC))
Would you mind having another look at the article? Or does it need to be submitted again for review? (StephenFBanham (talk) 05:37, 30 March 2018 (UTC))
New Page Review Newsletter No.10
ACTRIAL:
- ACTRIAL's six month experiment restricting new page creation to (auto)confirmed users ended on 14 March. As expected, a greatly increased number of unsuitable articles and candidates for deletion are showing up in the feed again, and the backlog has since increased already by ~30%. Please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day.
Paid editing
- Now that ACTRIAL is inoperative pending discussion, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary.
Subject-specific notability guidelines
- The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
- Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies. A further discussion is currently taking place at: Can a subject specific guideline invalidate the General Notability Guideline?
Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled
- While patrolling articles, if you find an editor that is particularly competent at creating quality new articles, and that user has created more than 25 articles (rather than stubs), consider nominating them for the 'Autopatrolled' user right HERE.
News
- The next issue Wikipedia's newspaper The Signpost has now been published after a long delay. There are some articles in it, including ACTRIAL wrap-up that will be of special interest to New Page Reviewers. Don't hesitate to contribute to the comments sections. The Signpost is one of the best ways to stay up date with news and new developments - please consider subscribing to it. All editors of Wikipedia and associated projects are welcome to submit articles on any topic for consideration by the The Signpost's editorial team for the next issue.
To opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
04:10:44, 30 March 2018 review of submission by Mheydaran
Mheydaran (talk) 04:10, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
I am not clear what I need to do in order to cite the 50 publications included in the page using inline citation as recommended.
Would you please help?
- Mheydaran - Read citations for beginners. However, citating anything he has written won't help your case for inclusion. See General notablity guidelines. You need to cite publications that talk about the subject Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 11:42, 31 March 2018 (UTC)