Welcome!

Hello, Latintooth, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Intelligence Subnet Theory, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 18:47, 9 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Intelligence Subnet Theory edit

 

A tag has been placed on Intelligence Subnet Theory requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 18:47, 9 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Welcome edit

Hello... Ben? Please read WP:Not made up. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 19:09, 9 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

No, I didn't make it up in a day. It has been under thought for years. Where can I publish my philosophical thoughts? Latintooth (talk) 19:15, 9 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Unfortunately not much can be done to save your article. I'd be happy to help you write a different article.Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 19:15, 9 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Wow thanks man, that's very kind of you. I think I'll try to moderate some philosophical articles and make sure no one spams them, but I won't do anything to hurt Wikipedia. I will try not to do this stupid mistake again. No original ideas! By the way, do you know how I can help out other newcomers? Latintooth (talk) 19:20, 9 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not use talk pages such as Talk:Infinity for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 18:17, 11 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Infinity, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Please do not delete other user's messages you don't agree with from Article talk pages. Thank you - DVdm (talk) 07:21, 25 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately or undeliberately introducing incorrect information and ignoring and erasing article talk page messages, as you did to Infinity, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - DVdm (talk) 07:25, 25 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hey I've talked to mathematical professors, a lot. They all agree that infinity is NOT a quantity.
But "talks to mathematical professors" are not counted as reliable sources in Wikipedia: see WP:RS and WP:V. And If you talked to professors who told you that Infinity simply is a word which means "limitless" or "without limit", like you put in the article, then these professors don't know the difference between a noun and an adjective. DVdm (talk) 20:39, 25 June 2010 (UTC)Reply