User talk:LFaraone/Archive/01
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia! Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, leave a message on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. MichaelBillington 00:51, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you for your consideration, but I have been on the Wiki for 2 yrs. The Fox Man of Fire 00:52, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
- Wow! you've been here four times as long as me and your talk page is empty? Anyway, sorry for not checking but I thought you were a newbie. MichaelBillington 00:58, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Revert of edit on Randall Terry
Hello,
May I ask why you reverted the edit on the Randall Terry article where I disambiguated IRS to Internal Revenue Service ? Travelbird 18:14, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
I am sorry, I made a mistake. Please accept my apology.
The Fox Man of Fire 18:17, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
No problem. Travelbird 18:21, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Your VandalProof Application
Dear Firefoxman,
Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact with the new 1.2 version release it has even more power. As such we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that for security reasons, VandalProof's creator requires it's users to have made 250 edits to articles, which you have not. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again in the not too distant future. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. - Glen Stollery 07:05, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 19th.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 2, Issue 25 | 19 June 2006 | |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
Message delivered by Ralbot 23:57, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 26th.
| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 2, Issue 26 | 26 June 2006 | |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
Message delivered by Ralbot 23:27, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Horacio Elizondo
When you edited Horacio Elizondo you erased a large chunk of the article. I'm not sure what you were trying to edit, but I have reverted your changes so if you want to make your edit, you can try again. Ytny 17:07, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
- Got it, no big deal. Ytny 17:13, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Cosmo (Sonic the Hedgehog)
Thank you for experimenting with the page Cosmo (Sonic the Hedgehog) on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Firsfron of Ronchester 17:16, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry. The spellcheck script I was using malfunctioned.
The Fox Man of Fire 18:02, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
- No problem. Thanks for the communication. :) --Firsfron of Ronchester 18:06, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
It's happened again, more recently. Can you please cease using the spellchecker before you continue truncating articles. Thanks, — FireFox 19:08, 02 July '06
- Once again, I would like to say I am sorry for the damage I have inadvertantly caused. The Fox Man of Fire 19:11, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Reversion of edits on Jamison Green
Why'd you revert my edits? I removed some content, true, but it was all POV stuff. I don't see what I did wrong. Switchercat talkcont 02:46, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
I am sorry, I must have misread you edits. Please accept my humble apology. The Fox Man of Fire 02:48, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- All right. Thank you. :) Switchercat talkcont 02:59, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
RE: VandalProof application
We're having some issues with the approval system at the moment, so I'm not approving anyone because I'm concerned that it will fail. Sorry for the trouble, and I hope we will have it fixed soon. Thank you for your application. —Xyrael / 15:28, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
Ok! The Fox Man of Fire 02:04, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Your AfD
I see you created Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mason Henshaw, pages like this can be speedy deleted. See WP:CSD for more information on how to do this. Have fun.--Andeh 02:02, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Ok. Thanks!The Fox Man of Fire 02:03, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Firefoxman! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Computerjoe's talk 11:59, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks! The Fox Man of Fire 12:02, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
- What you need to do is click 'update' Computerjoe's talk 12:10, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
re:Vandalism warning of 42 (number)
Perhaps you misunderstood my reverting. What 68.83.30.84 was vandalism, so I reverted it. I was planning to put back what 208.31.84.254 wrote, but before I got a chance to, I was reverted. -- TheGreatLlama (speak to the Llama!) 22:07, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Mozart article revision
Hi, thank you for contacting me. I actually didn't edit that to test, I did it to just supply that article with more information about Mozart. Can I put the info back now?--66.90.11.138 03:23, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Thank you very much, I'll get to it now.--66.90.11.138 03:25, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oops, good thing I saw this. However, to truly revert it, you would have had to bypass my earlier revert (I think I and 66.90.11.138 were working at the same time). But it's done now, no big thing. :) — $PЯINGεrαgђ 04:24, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
reversion
You reverted one of my edits with no apparent reason or discussion?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.43.8.36 (talk • contribs)
- Sorry, I do not respond to Unsigned comments. The Fox Man of Fire 11:43, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, they seem to have a valid point [1]--AOL account 12:06, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- Opps! I made a mistake and read the wrong side of the edit column. Sorry!The Fox Man of Fire 12:08, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, they seem to have a valid point [1]--AOL account 12:06, 6 October 2006 (UTC)