User talk:L235/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Talkback

Hello, L235. You have new messages at User:Strike Eagle/CVUA.
Message added 03:31, 5 June 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I'm surprised you havent watchlisted the page! ƬheStrikeΣagle ^sorties 03:31, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Oh, sorry! Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 03:36, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

@Strike Eagle:Would it be fine if I included reverts from before(using twinkle)? Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 03:37, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

yes, but make sure they are from the last 2 days max... Thanks, ƬheStrikeΣagle ^sorties 03:51, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Confused...

Hello, I was trying to make an edit on a page. I apparently don't know the rules or etiquette when editing a Wikipedia account and my edit was removed by you. Is there a way you could explain to me what I did wrong and how I can fix it?...the page was Jim Dreyer That profile is so outdated and very inaccurate. KatMurph79 (talk) 07:21, 5 June 2014 (UTC)KatMurph1979

@KatMurph79:I'm sorry, I don't see any edit made by that account except posting on my talk page. Please point me to the exact edit? Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 12:36, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

A bit of help needed

Hi. I was just wondering, is it normal at SPI for accounts to be confirmed as socks by a CU but not blocked for three days? They're still not blocked. Case is here. I was just wondering; if I'm just being impatient, please let me know. Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 03:08, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Unfortunately, SPI cases often hang around for a long time waiting to be dealt with, often much more than three days. In my experience that is particularly common at the stage of waiting for a CU, because there just aren't enough CUs, but it also happens when the case is waiting for an administrator (as seems to be the case here), partly because not enough admins choose to work on SPIs, and partly because some SPIs are really difficult and time consuming, so admins tend to avoid those SPIs. Thanks for drawing attention to this one: I'll have a look at it now. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:01, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 19:10, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

I have just closed the SPI. After posting to your page above, I did nothing but work on that case until I closed it, and that took me 39 minutes. I am not willing to block just because checkuser says so, without checking the behavioural evidence myself, two of the accounts did not have checkuser confirmation so I had to look into those, and I had to have a reasonably detailed knowledge of the case to be able to decide what to do about the master account: those are the reasons why it took me so long. That was a much simpler and more straightforward case than many that I have seen, so perhaps you can get some idea why complex cases tend to be avoided by admins. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:47, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Ok, thanks! Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 20:02, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

RE: A cookie for you!

K6ka has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!

--k6ka (talk | contribs) 02:20, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Cookie

XXSNUGGUMSXX has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!

XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 05:36, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello

Hello, I am sorry if it looks like I am using this for social media. Actually, I am not. It is just that I like to fix links (I am really a perfectionist ) and I have just started to edit more articles. Thanks for telling me, though! Brmedia 18:32, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification. Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 18:46, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Anarcho-capitalism

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Anarcho-capitalism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Dan Bilzerian page

You are not suitable to be a Wikipedia admin. You see above where it says 'Encyclopedic content must be verifiable'? All I did was remove the venture capitalist tag because it is not verified. How is this defamatory or libelous? You are not following Wikipedia's policy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.90.127.86 (talk) 01:39, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi there. I welcome a request for retraction or self revert, but an accusation of me acting in bad faith to break Wikipedia policy is unacceptable, to me. Also, I am not a Wikipedia admin, and also, see source 6. Which Wikipedia policy exactly do you accuse me of breaching, and what diffs do you have to prove it? Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 01:51, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Mike Kosa

I nominated said article for speedy deletion under G11, but it was removed. He put a template on it stating that it is under major reconstruction, and no editing should take place. What do you think? Thanks, ❀Larksky12358❀^Guestbook 01:20, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

@Larksky12358: I've removed the advert tag. Consider using any other PROD tag or bringing it to Afd. For now I have added the BLP Prod tag. OccultZone (Talk) 01:52, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

I'll take a look at it in a bit, I'm really bust right now. Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 01:53, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

@Larksky12358:@OccultZone:FYI, I have AfD'd it. Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 02:14, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Opinion about this page

What are your opinions about the page, Ynsa? OccultZone (Talk) 01:48, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Which page? Could you discuss it on that talk page, not on my user talk? Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 01:54, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Whoops, sorry, my bad; I thought you were talking to user "Ynsa", my bad, I'll have a look at it. Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 01:58, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Oh.. Nice signature. OccultZone (Talk) 01:59, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

@OccultZone:I've CSD'd it, if that's what you were hoping for. Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 02:19, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Whether the subject has notability or not, it can be merged too, but lets watch. OccultZone (Talk) 02:26, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Ynsa

Hello Lixxx235. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Ynsa, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: "I don't know what the article is about" is not a reason for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 04:32, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for responding to my adoption request. I would love to be adopted by you and look forward to whatever is in store. 1Matt20 (talk) 18:05, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

On Adoption

Thanks for responding to my adoption request. I would love to be adopted by you and look forward to whatever is in store. 1Matt20 (talk), 18:07, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Replied to on your talk Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 20:39, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

I think the relaxed style would be best for me. 1Matt20 (talk) 02:37, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

@1Matt20:Ok, yeah, that was what I was thinking as well, because you obviously not a new editor ;). What exactly do you want to get out of this adoption? Getting more familiar with maintenance tasks? Anti vandalism, that sort of thing? Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 02:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

I need to familiarize myself with precisely those kinds of things - I've spent all my time so far on here creating articles; my experience on the opposite side of the Wikipedia coin is nonexistent. 1Matt20 (talk 04:54, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

@1Matt20:OK, that's good, maintenance work has been my main focus. Please remember to indent your comments appropriately- see Help:Using_talk_pages#Indentation. If you want to get started and dive in, I recommend you install Twinkle and test it out in a sandbox or something, and also read WP:VAND, WP:What vandalism is not, and if you want to get diving in, check out WP:WARN and WP:RCP. Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 13:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

New adoption

Hi thanks for your message. Yes, I'm still up for adoption.

Please let me know what I have to do. thanks M.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Metamatica (talk • contribs)

@Metamatica:OK, great. You don't really have to do anything, but I'd like to ask you what style of adoption you'd like. Do you want a formal "school style" adoption, or a more relaxed adoption? Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 13:50, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Small point of order on AfD

If you nominate an article for deletion, you don't have to also provide an explicit "delete" !vote, and it's usually better if you don't. If you're nominating an article for deletion, it's understood that you are arguing for deletion and your nomination rationale is implicitly a deletion argument (unless you specifically say that it is a procedural nomination and you are staying neutral). Nominating and then adding a separate delete !vote can sometimes lead to accusations of "double-!voting". Things can get pretty heated on AfD. — Gwalla | Talk 04:15, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Oh, OK, sorry about that. Thanks for telling me! Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 13:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

No prob, just wanted to head it off before somebody decided to start some drama. — Gwalla | Talk 06:19, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Good advice by Gwalla, and if you ever see the double votes on a Afd, you are allowed to remove them or turn that double "delete" or "keep" into "comment", you can also cross like this. OccultZone (Talk) 06:23, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Sterndmitri: The Adoption

Dear Lixxx235,

i've found your offer to be adopted by yourself, thank you for your interest to me so much! The fine point to me is that before you leaved me the message, in my turn i had sent a message to Charlesdrakew regarding adoption issues. His decision was positive, so it would be quite stupid from my side to play chinese telephone and change the decisions and intentions now.

But may i be adopted by 2 users? If yes, i would like to be your adoptee with pleasure. Not sure about the established format of interacting within the adopting and Wikipedia, but we can talk in Skype if you want as well, mine account is dmitri7807.

Have a great day! Dmitri (talk)

10:28 2014-06-10

@Charlesdrakew:A bleated welcome to Wikipedia to you! You may, of course, have two adopters, but Charlesdrakew is more experienced than me, and our experience completely overlap- counter-vandalism, so I respectfully decline your offer to be adopted by two people. If you want to be adopted by two people, it'd probably be a better idea to find someone experienced in content creation instead of counter-vandalism. Cheers! Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 13:52, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

@Dmitri:@Charlesdrakew:Goodness, I pinged the wrong person, did I? Sorry. See message above please. Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 23:12, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Regarding Adoption

Hi Lixxx235, I would be glad to be adopted by you and learn more about using Wikipedia, let me know how and when to start. - Dilip Rajendran 19:39, 9 June 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Waxwine (talk • contribs)

@Waxwine:Oh, gee, I didn't think this many people would still be interested and on Wikipedia. I now have 7 adoptees, including you ;). The major question is: do you want a formal "school style" adoption, or a more relaxed one? Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 20:34, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

@Lixxx235: I am comfotable eirther way, but I prefer the relaxed one as learning is more fun that way :) - Waxwine Dilip Rajendran 19:16, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

@Waxwine:OK. Are you interested more in content creation, or are you interested in maintenance tasks, such as counter vandalism? Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 19:33, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

@Lixxx235: As I have limited free time during my work, for now I am Interested in maintanance tasks. Thank you -- Waxwine Dilip Rajendran 20:44, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

@Waxwine:Sorry for the delay in reply, I am on semi wikibreak supposedly ;). I'll get into the adoption stuff tomorrow, just wanted to let you know that you should use one more colon than the comment you are replying to, to get the correct indentation, and that you don't need to use {{ping}} to a user who's user talk you are modifying, as they get a message about you leaving them a message anyways. If you have some extra time on your hands, turn on WP:TWINKLE in your account preferences, and also read WP:VAND. Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 03:20, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Thank you, I have turned on WP:TWINKLE in my account preferences and I read the about WP:VAND. -- Waxwine Dilip R 01:44, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

@Waxwine:OK. Why don't you try to catch some vandals? Use Twinkle and Special:RecentChanges to find some vandalism, revert it, and leave a warning on their talk page? Of course, if you have any questions, ask me. Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 14:24, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Further Adoption

Thank you for and I gladly accept your offer of adoption! ZaphodsCatwalk (talk) 20:34, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Replied to on your talk Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 20:39, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Let's go with formal. My pace may be sporadic.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ZaphodsCatwalk/Adoption

On the informal, questions-as-they-come-up side:
How do I delete this? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ZaphodsCatwalk/Adoption ZaphodsCatwalk (talk) 14:37, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

@ZaphodsCatwalk:OK, let's do this! I will be creating an adoption page under your user talk page, where I will be leaving assignments. If at any time you feel like you have too many assignments, let me know. If you want to delete a page under your userspace, simply nominate it for deletion under CSD U1, by placing {{db-u1}} on that page. Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 14:42, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Re:DRN

Seems all the required opinions have been collected, and that we're ready for you. Ngebendi (talk) 17:41, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Adoption

Sorry about the delayed response but if you would still take me for adoption i would be honored. Thanks Shepherd of Fire (talk) 21:27, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Shepherd of Fire. Sorry, I had thought that since most of the people I had sent adopt offers to would be inactive, seeing latest edit dates, etc. I would be glad to take you, but as you can see from this, questions and messages may not get a timely answer. If you would still like to proceed the adoption with me, let me know whether you want a formal "school style" adoption or a more relaxed one. Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 03:31, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

thank you. I would wish to proceed with the adoption in the more relaxed fashion. Thank you very much. Shepherd of Fire (talk) 03:36, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

OK, what are your interests- content creation or maintenance? Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 03:37, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

I am much more interested in maintenance but would like to be more involved in content creation, albeit my past atte,pts there have been less than successful. Shepherd of Fire (talk) 03:43, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

OK, let's start with maintenance then. Are you famaliar with WP:VAND and WP:TWINKLE, and have WP:TW enabled? If not, turn on Twinkle(takes 10 seconds) and read up on vand. If you are, let me know. Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 03:46, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Adoption - Tachyon1010101010

Hello Lixxx235,

I got your message. I would like to be adopted by you. I have never been adopted before, but hopefully it will turn into a mutually beneficial friendship.

[Hi there, I'm Lixxx235. I have been a registered user since 2010 and I am currently a rollbacker and reviewer. Are you still interested in the adoption program? If so, I'd be honored to adopt you. If you would like me to adopt you, please leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Lixxx235Got a complaint? 20:19, 8 June 2014 (UTC)]

Sincerely,

Tachyon 1010101010 Tachyon1010101010 (talk) 17:41, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Tachyon1010101010. I would be glad to adopt you, but I want to tell you that I might not be a good fit, as I am busy not just within the adoption program(see this) and in general. I would be happy to adopt you, but you should consider: would you prefer for another person to adopt you? Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 00:31, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

decline Boxcar Averager Article

Dear Lixxx235, thanks for taking the time to review my proposed article on Boxcar Averagers. I appreciate your feedback, however it leaves me a bit lost in a sense that I don't know how to continue. I carefully read and clicked through your suggestions but I can't find any evidence that my proposal falls into the categories of an essay (personal opinion and feelings) or original research (as there is a piece of equipment described). At the moment I would not even know what questions to ask in the help desk.

When writing the article I took existing articles (e.g. lock-in amplifier etc.) as an example and thought my result is very close in style.

As far as I can see there are no online text book sources that can be simply summarized here as you suggest. But the research papers cited contain the information that is reflected in the article.

As this is my first article to write I very much appreciate to get more concrete input on how to improve my style of writing.

P.S. pls excuse if this is the wrong place to make this posting. The system looks in fact very confusing to me. Drjimbonobo (talk) 12:46, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

@Drjimbonobo:Yes, this is the right place to ask that question. Sorry, I don't have much time for Wikipedia right now- I'm doing this in a 10-minute break between exams ;). I'll get back to you ASAP. Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 13:42, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

@Drjimbonobo:It reads like an advertisement, and it shows people how to do something, which is generally not allowed. OccultZone or Tutelary, sorry to bother you, but would you mind taking a look at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Boxcar Averagers and see if I did anything wrong? Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 03:27, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

• Comment - Yes it sound like an advertisement to a normal reader who reads the list, 1-2 subsections, then moves on. Such opinion matters. In fact there is a need to improve the article, I won't disagree with the decline. I think that the History section should be either turned into lead or expanded, and it should be the first section of this article. Although if I was the creator, I would've explained some history on the lead of article. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 03:32, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

On the contrary, it does not look like an advertisement in any way. Though it appears to be using technical terms that a normal reader (like myself) don't understand, that can be appropriated by a maintenance tag. For the actual notability of the subject, I see that it's mostly using book sources, which I cannot access. A quick google search notes that there are a ton of sources for the subject, which might show the notability for it if used as references. The 'essay' reasoning for declining imho is a bit spotty. It doesn't seem to be a reflection essay but a malformed article. Some sentences may hint towards an essay, but that can be edited or improved at a later time. Like, for example, the lead is too long, but if you were to separate everything after and then average over multiple integration results (samples). into a different section, it would look alright. All in all, I don't agree with your declining of this article for the reasoning given, to be blunt about it. Tutelary (talk) 03:42, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

@Tutelary:OK, thanks. I wasn't sure if I was right or not, so that's why I pinged you. What should I grade it as when I accept it? Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 03:44, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Lixxx235, I'm gonna be blunt just one more time; if you're not sure whether to accept or decline an article, then you should skip it outright. I'd rather that backlog just be one article larger than some article being prematurely declined or a crappy article being accepted. We need more AfC reviewers, which is why I invite you to continue doing so, but please be more careful. If indecisive/can't make a decision, skip that article. It's not a race nor a contest to see who reviews X amount of articles. It's about quality, not quantity. Tutelary (talk) 03:48, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Right Tutelary, that is one reason why I am not that active on Afc. Sometimes decline can be considered as AGF, so that the article creator may evolve or rewrite the article. What we can say, we still got the article and it can be accepted anytime once it will meet the standards. New editors do take things seriously than needed, so yes, we have to take care of that.

Lixxx, skipping is a good option. You can maintain a list of doubtful Afc and inform other regular editors such as DGG, Anne Delong for assistance. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 03:51, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

(edit conflict)@Tutelary:OK. If you look, I declined that article more than ten days ago. I am aware that declining it was not the correct course of action. I asked you, someone who is rather critical of me, to review what I did. Now, with that vast experience of yours, again, could you tell me what level of cleanup work I should do and what I should grade it as, or are you busy right now? Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 03:53, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

I am not busy right now. I see that now. I wasn't intending to attack you, if you took it that way. Though to answer your question, I need to know what you mean by 'what should I grade it as?' The article? AfC reviews? I can't really tell what you're referring to. This article? Tutelary (talk) 03:55, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

What it's quality rating would be when I accept the article via AfC. Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 04:00, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

I'm going to assume you're meaning about the Wikiprojects. If it's something else, please indicate it. Otherwise, it would be start class. It still needs more sources before it establishes that it meets the general notability guideline. I would hold off on accepting it, making a note on the creator's talk page about more references. Then accept it. Tutelary (talk) 04:07, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 04:10, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the discussion which is extremely useful and interesting to me as a new author. I very much appreciate the „quality before quantity“ approach and will be happy to make changes to the article accordingly and based on your feedback. From the statements above I gather the following points: 1. shorten the lead 2. mention some history in the lead 3. find more publicly available sources to back the statements 4. avoid over emphasizing positive aspects (which seems to give the advertising impression to some readers). Please let me know in case I missed anything. Also it would be wonderful if you could point me to an article of the same kind (description of a scientific instrument) that you consider as a good example. Would you say the article on Oscilloscopes can serve as a role model?Drjimbonobo (talk) 06:15, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

@Drjimbonobo:Yes, that's exactly right. Oscilloscopes is a very good roll model, from a minutes worth of investigation. Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 03:06, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Thank you very much for your tireless effort to adopt newbie. Keep up the good work! And trust me you are a true Wikipedian. Jim Carter (talk) 19:24, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Reply

I would like to be adopted, but, i am on a unpredictable on and off schedule, so i may not be able to respond quicly, also, i know the basics of wikipedia, but not the more complicated ones. -Yutah Andrei Marzan Ogawa¹²³|UPage|_☺★ (talk) 04:45, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Andrei Marzan. Sorry, I had thought that since most of the people I had sent adopt offers to would be inactive, seeing latest edit dates, etc. I would be glad to take you, but as you can see from this, questions and messages may not get a timely answer. If you would still like to proceed the adoption with me, let me know whether you want a formal "school style" adoption or a more relaxed one. Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 03:31, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

I would like the relaxed one, whatever it is.-Yutah Andrei Marzan Ogawa¹²³|UPage|_☺★ (talk) 08:35, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

@Andrei Marzan:Sorry about my absolutely sluggish responses- I have actually been very sick and unable to edit. I will also be away from Wikipedia for about a week starting around the day after tomorrow. If you want the more relaxed one, why don't you read up on WP:VAND and WP:TW? Then I will give you a list of diffs and it will be your job to determine whether it is vandalism or not. How does that sound? Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 03:30, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Ok, that will do. - Yutah Andrei Marzan Ogawa¹²³|UPage|_☺★ (talk) 06:23, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Adoption

Yes! Yes! Thank you for the offer to adopt me. Really excited and very grateful. Where do we start? Would you suggest me doing this course: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:School_of_Open_course?

Thx, SusanChana — Preceding unsigned comment added by SusanChana (talk • contribs) 12:58, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

@SusanChana:Hi! Sure, if you want to, you can go through that, but I would prefer you not doing it yet as I have not gotten to know you yet and don't know what would fit you best. I have a few questions for you: do you want a "course" style adoption, or a more relaxed adoption? Are you interested in maintenance tasks?

Also, I noticed on your user page that you may have a conflict of interest when editing Wikipedia. Please read WP:COI. Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 13:53, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

@Lixxx235 Yes I am familiar with the COI, but if I don't intend to edit pages for clients but unrelated ones would that allowed? I just happen to work for a firm, but really want to personally get more hands on experience because I am a huge Wikipedia fan. A bit of a geek in fact:) SusanChana (talk) 13:35, 18 June 2014 (UTC)SusanChana

@Lixxx235 If that is ok, I would really like to start at the bottom and work my way up with some basic maintenance tasks. As for the training, would like "course" style adoption if possible.SusanChana (talk) 13:37, 18 June 2014 (UTC)SusanChana

@Lixxx235 just checking back in with you to see if we can still work together. Thx! [redacted]17:47, 20 June 2014 (UTC)SusanChana

@SusanChana:Sorry about my absolutely sluggish responses- I have actually been very sick and unable to edit. I will also be away from Wikipedia for about a week starting around the day after tomorrow. I have asked an admin to revdel your IP, as it may have revealed personally identifying info without you intending so. I will set up an adoption page for you on your talk. Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 03:35, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

@Lixxx235 thx for getting back in touch. hope you feel better soon. Look forward to connecting when you are well. SusanChana (talk) 12:41, 22 June 2014 (UTC)SusanChana

Please comment on Talk:United States Senate election in Virginia, 2014

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:United States Senate election in Virginia, 2014. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for the welcome and the info! Definitely a lot to learn around here, but the past few days have been fun editing for the first time. What is this "adopt a user" thing? Llopster (talk) 03:37, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:YesAllWomen

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:YesAllWomen. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Eric Brown (painter)

Hi. Here's to let you know I've declined Draft:Eric Brown (painter) with comments on the article and on the editor's talk page. StarryGrandma (talk) 21:27, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for your work on "Ripley Ville". It was all very helpful to a first timer. PeterEltham (talk) 12:20, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Lixxx235

Vkqjskdls (talk) 07:19, 16 July 2014 (UTC)As you've advised me earlier today, I have modified my page to look more neutral. Please have a look and let me know if it still needs further modification. Thanks!

Please help me regarding page Opelmart

Hi, Lixxx235,

I am in a big trouble, please help me. I had created a article named opelmart, but it seems to be deleted. I am a new user at wikipedia, and does not know about wiki's terms and policies, so I think I have done some mistake over there. But I am not able to rectify it. Please help me regarding it.

Actually my name is Dipanjan Paul, one and only proprietor of opelmart.com, and I saw that every eCommerce company has a WIKI page, but we don't have any. So I thought that, If I create a page then my company also have a Wiki page. So I create an account and create a article named opelmart.

But after few times it is showing that, it will be deleted. But I don't know what is the issue we have done. Please let me know about the issue. Or if you can please advice me any kind of way out.

Please help us to create a wikipedia article, named opelmart.

Thanks a lot

Regards Dipanjan paul Proprietor Opelmart.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Opelmart (talk • contribs) 05:30, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

@Opelmart:Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. There are a few points I'd like to address:

• You did not establish that "Opelmart" is notable. Please see WP:NCORP for details.
• Please list the eCommerce companies that have Wikipedia articles. I think you'll find that each one of them is notable, and if not, I will propose them for deletion if you want.
• Because you stated that you are a representative of "Opelmart", please read WP:COI.
• Please note that only one person may have access to a Wikipedia account. Ever. Use of a Wikipedia account on behalf of a group is prohibited.

I hope I cleared up some of your confusion. If you have any questions, please ask on my talk page. Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 05:52, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Please Help me.

Hi, Lixxx235

Please tell me, what will I do to create an article in wikipedia, named opelmart. Please guide me.

Expecting a way out from your side.

Thank You. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.96.39.246 (talk) 09:54, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm not Lixxx235, but I recommend as the owner of the store that you do not create an article about your store. As per the reasons Lixxx235, your company does not seem notable enough. Please note that we are not the place to host your company articles on demand and we will only wrote about topics that are notable per our guidelines. If, however, you feel that you pass our notability standards, feel free to contact me and I will try to help you. However, please also note that it is still not advisable for you to create an article about your own company as you may, intentionally or unintentionally, try to make the article biased to promote your company, which is against our guidelines. Therefore, you cannot expect a way out of "our side" unless you prove your company's notability. Thank you. Darylgolden^(talk) 12:04, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Unreview

Thank you. MaynardClark (talk) 04:48, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: MiCoST (Melaka International College of Science and Technology)

Hello Lixxx235. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of MiCoST (Melaka International College of Science and Technology), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to schools. Thank you. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:10, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Miroslav Konštanc Adam

Hello! I've added the references to this article. Could you remove the nomination for deletion, please? Best regards, Propositum (talk) 18:10, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

deleting xtam4

brah its not hoax, you can google around him or go on any hacking / hidden community and ask about him. He is well known for bringing in tons of operations against israel and many more. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.185.239.14 (talk) 04:22, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Palm Pistol

I have rewritten Palm Pistol almost entirely and accepted it. I'm curious why User:2aholdings couldn't write the draft themselves; they could thank me for accepting it within a few minutes. Huon (talk) 02:40, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Opinion polling for the next United Kingdom general election

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Opinion polling for the next United Kingdom general election. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

New huggle 3.1 is going to be released soon

Hi Lixxx235, we are to release a new major version of huggle, but we did receive almost no feedback from our beta testing team, which you are a part of (see https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Huggle/Members). It would be of a great help if you could download it (if you have windows, all you need to do is getting http://tools.wmflabs.org/huggle/files/huggle3.1.0beta.exe and putting it to a folder where you have installed huggle) and test it. You can always get a help with making it @ #huggle ^connect!

Major changes:

• Multisite support - you can now log in to unlimited number of wikis in 1 huggle session and get a huge queue of all edits made to these wikis. This is good for smaller projects which gets overlooked often.
• Ranged diffs - you can select multiple revisions and get a huge diff that display all changes done to them.
• Fixes of most of bug reports we had so far

In case you found a bug, please report it to bugzilla: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/buglist.cgi?product=Huggle&list_id=147663 thank you! Petrb (talk) 10:11, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Response to talk page message

Hi,

I created my account just to edit/add some info on Monika Kapil Mohta wikipage. But in no way is this a Role Account. I don't know what justification I can show here that this account does not belong to the Indian Embassy, Poland but by myself. Please let me know if I can be allowed to edit further. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by IndiaPoland (talk • contribs) 08:22, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

@IndiaPoland:OK, sorry about that. Don't worry about it. I do suggest, however, that you take a look at WP:CHU/S and get your username changed to something that represents you personally. Cheers and Thanks, L235-Talk Ping when replying 14:00, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Talk page guidelines

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Talk page guidelines. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 August 2014

• Technology report: A technologist's Wikimania preview

• Traffic report: Ebola

• Featured content: Bottoms, asses, and the fairies that love them

• Wikimedia in education: Leading universities educate with Wikipedia in Mexico

• News and notes: "History is a human right"—first-ever transparency report released as Europe begins hiding Wikipedia in search results

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Thanks for all the wikilove. It's about time I return one in favour. TheQ Editor (Talk) 15:37, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

@TheQ Editor:Why thanks! Cheers and Thanks, L235-Talk Ping when replying 16:03, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Natural hazard submission

Hi there - Thanks very much for reviewing my contribution. I looked back at the submission in my sandbox, and I can't tell why my submission was declined. The previous version of this page included a note saying that it had issues (lack of citations). So my main focus in making a contribution at this stage was to add new sources. Can you please give me some additional feedback? I'd appreciate whatever guidance you have to offer.

Also - just to clarify - this was my first submission, and I was a bit confused about submitting and actually already posted the live page in addition to submitting for review. Since my submission was declined, then the live page probably needs to revert to pre-July 25 or whenever I updated the live page. Thanks for your help! Tburress (talk) 16:53, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

@Tburress:It was just a procedural decline because Natural hazard existed. Cheers and Thanks, L235-Talk Ping when replying 17:05, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Gotcha - thanks, and sorry about my confusion :) Tburress (talk) 17:08, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

I thought of another question for you. When I added content and citations to the natural hazard page, I was motivated by the "this page needs citations" note at the top. So that's what I mostly did - although I did add a couple of new subsections and content. But when I updated the live page (and in my submission for review), I did not remove the "this page has issues" note from 2009. I wasn't sure if the number of citations I added met the guidelines to remove the directive. Do you know, or is there another place I should ask? Thanks again for your help, Tburress (talk) 17:40, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

@Tburress:It's good enough for me, WP:V is what guideline you're looking for, but I've removed the tag. Cheers and Thanks, L235-Talk Ping when replying 17:50, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Biographies of living persons

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Biographies of living persons. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Help

Hi. How do I search so that only local files(not from commons) appear? Cheers and Thanks, L235-Talk Ping when replying 20:45, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi, L235 – you will find what you need at Help:Searching#Parameters. The category you will search in is Category:All non-free media. That will exclude all the free media in Commons. – Paine Ellsworth ^CLIMAX! 22:18, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

@Paine Ellsworth:, tried, didn't work. See Help:Category#Searching_for_articles_in_categories: ""Note that using search to find categories will not find articles which have been categorized using templates. This feature also doesn't return pages in subcategories." Any other way you know of?

Serves me right for not digging deeper. This is one I'm going to have to sleep on. There is a long-standing open bug report, T4285, so they still appear to be working on this. Joys! – Paine  03:45, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

To clarify: I'm asking anyone who might know. Cheers and Thanks, L235-Talk Ping when replying 01:00, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Try this. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:10, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

@Anna Frodesiak:On the very second entry, below name.jpg, that file is from Commons. Cheers. Cheers and Thanks, L235-Talk Ping when replying 01:15, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Well, I'll be darned. You're right. This is the link I use to find only my local uploads. Maybe that will lead you in the right direction. Sorry I can't be more helpful. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:26, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the link. I'm reduced to downloading the database dumps and doing it that way, and that's cumbersome. Anyone else have any suggestions?

Try this. It's Anna's link, with the username field left blank. I think that's got it :) -- Diannaa (talk) 02:48, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

@Diannaa:As I said above, I need a way to search through the files. Thanks though. Cheers and Thanks, L235-Talk Ping when replying 03:17, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

L235, I'm not sure how much this will help you, but if you search for the first word of a file, you'll note that Category:All non-free media is large and the TOC will help in searches for up to the first two letters. Here is an easy way for that to be extended by use of the URL field of your browser. To the URL:

• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:All_non-free_media

just add:

• &from=(the first letters)

to yield:

• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:All_non-free_media&from=(the first letters)

For example:

• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:All_non-free_media&from=lakeland

will bring up a page that begins with all the file names that begin with "lakeland". This only helps if you know the first three or more letters of the file name. Still haven't figured out how to easily search for any word in a file name, yet. I'll let you know when I do. – Paine Ellsworth ^CLIMAX! 05:49, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

A couple of glitches since yesterday – 1) I tested the above just now and the "&from=" did not work, so I gave the "?from=" a try and that worked; however, 2) when I tried a full file name there was a little problem in that the file name after the one I entered was at the top of the page, and I had to go back a page to find my file name at the very bottom (and to the right). So if the ampersand (&) doesn't work, then try the question mark (?), and if your file name is not at the top-left, then try the previous page at the bottom-right. So far, #2 only happens when there is more that one word (separated in the URL by an underscore instead of a plain space), so if there is only one word in your search string, you should not see the #2 glitch. – Paine  12:29, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the info. Cheers and Thanks, L235-Talk Ping when replying 18:16, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (music)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (music). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

You asked Me to Clarify my Questions

1. Please write your Answer for this Question: (In real life, As soon as a Dead Female's corpse gets Discovered, is It possible for Anyone to Prove that Female was Automatically raped Against her Will?)

2. Please write your Answer for this Question: (In real life, As soon as a Dead Female's corpse gets Discovered, is It possible for Anyone to Prove that Female was Automatically having (Rough but Consensual) sex?) (50.173.3.170 (talk) 18:41, 12 August 2014 (UTC)).

And this is an appropriate question for the {{help me}} template... why? Cheers and Thanks, L235-Talk Ping when replying 21:22, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Can you please Answer those Questions because I wasn't Allowed to Put those Questions on Wikipedia Entertainment Desk?(50.173.3.170 (talk) 22:02, 12 August 2014 (UTC)).

50.173.3.170, this is a formal request for you to stay off my talk page, except for required administrative notices, because I feel you are trolling me. Cheers and Thanks, L235-Talk Ping when replying 22:09, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello, L235. You have new messages at ArcAngel's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Please comment on Wikipedia:Dialogue on edits by U.S. Congressional staff

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Dialogue on edits by U.S. Congressional staff. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 13 August 2014 (UTC)