Open main menu
Patrio-Psychotic Anarcho-Materialism
Editor - iron star.jpgThis editor is a Veteran Editor
and is entitled to display this
Iron Editor Star.
Battle flag of the Confederate States of America.svg
This user will tenaciously defend the honor of his Confederate ancestors!
X This user does not believe in the existence of human races, except as a social construct. X
Freeciv U.armor.pngThis user is a grognard.
Chocolate chip cookies.jpgThis user welcomes new users and tags articles using Twinkle.{{tag}}
Camouflage.svgThis user is against involuntary military service.
Old book bindings.jpgThis user is a bibliophile.
Emblem of the United States Department of the Army.svg This user is retired from The United States Army. Dd214 corner.png
Combat Infantryman Badge
This user has been awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.
Basic Parachutist Badge
This user has been awarded the Basic Parachutist Badge.
User:Jake Wartenberg/centijimbo
No-spam.svgThis user is a member of WikiProject Spam.

Individual Sovereignty: every yard a kingdom, every dog and cat a serf.

Purple Star.png The Purple Barnstar
For standing out in your ability to bring vibrancy and style to the Wikipedia community! Ecoleetage (talk) 23:23, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Working Man's Barnstar.png The Working Man's Barnstar
for so tirelessly working on the LBHS page and fighting the vandals from there and their rival schools. GO-PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) 01:55, 5 December 2008 (UTC)


/archive 2


I noticed your comment here.. Decided that replying in that thread would be foolish, as it's a huge drama-fest and this issue is not directly related to that issue. But, I think you are way off base here. I'd wager that most admins have policies they don't care about enforcing. And since we're all volunteers, I don't think it's very reasonable to demand a particular level of service. If there's a job that needs done, it's OK if a bunch of people won't touch it. There's another bunch of people who will. Friday (talk) 14:21, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Fair enough and thank you for your feedback. We seem to disagree here and I am not interested in arguing the point and this is not an attempt to change your opinion, just to clarify mine. I understand your position and can certainly see the merits therein (so must others as it is our current methodology) but I do feel (since the community has seen fit to trust them with the broom) that a certain level of service is expected from the admin corps. We are all volunteers to be sure but taking on the mantle of adminship is a step beyond voluntarily editing the encyclopedia and comes with some responsibilities. This reminds me of the frustration I see expressed every so often at AiV; if an admin is unwilling to intervene with vandals, they should stay away from the vandalism intervention board. Sorry for the rant, this is just my opinion and you know what they say about opinions. Cheers. L0b0t (talk) 14:45, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 October 2#Bullshido.netEdit

Since you participated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ (3rd nomination), which was closed as "no consensus", you may be interested in a subsequent DRV. Since I disagreed with the close, I contacted the closing admin, who responded, "To be honest, Cunard, I would tend to agree with you, but I am not sure if the balance of things heads to delete rather than no consensus. Listing it at DRV might be a good option here; I won't endorse or oppose the close and will allow the DRV community to decide it. Therefore, I have listed this article at DRV; if you would like to participate, please see Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 October Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:12, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Please Stop Your Personal AttacksEdit

Not everything you don't understand is vandalism. -- (talk) 19:55, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

The Gelato Fiasco AFDsEdit

I've closed the second one and relisted the first one. I've also added the AFD tag to the article. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:44, 4 October 2009 (UTC)


[2], same with userpage. This [3] is a useful tool if you're harassed by crosswiki vandals. Best regards, Finn Rindahl (talk) 22:36, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of SmoshEdit

Ambox warning pn.svg
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Smosh. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smosh (4th nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Help LSUEdit

Hey buddy. I know you appreciated my work on the LSU page, but go here and nominate for LSU to be a collaboration article and a bunch of other people will pitch in

Just follow the directions on the page, and let me know if you need help. I'd really appreciate it. Thanks! Nowhereman86 (talk) 04:20, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Degrassi: The Next GenerationEdit

I have nominated Degrassi: The Next Generation for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. 117Avenue (talk) 03:29, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Your G.I. Joe IDW editEdit

If you could please explain to me the reason why you removed the sources for the names and dates of release of the GI Joe Collected editions in this edit [4]? Those references were provided so the table would be properly referenced/sourced and they were most certainly not a linkspam. Now with their removal the table is left totaly unsourced/unreferenced. I will await your response for the removal of the sources and, if you still have a problem with it, a compromise solution to our problem. Also, I took offense at you calling me a pimping spammy and would remind you of Wikipedias rule on civility. Thank you. Plastelin (talk) 17:45, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

They were removed because they were links to a comic book store selling those particular issues. Please see Wikipedia:Spam#External_link_spamming, and Wikipedia:External_links#Links_normally_to_be_avoided. The names and release dates are quite easily sourced by referencing the masthead of the publications themselves; there is no need to include external links to a particular retailer's inventory (there is also no reason to include external links in the article body at all, that is what the external links/sources/references sections are for). Sorry you got upset by an edit summary. L0b0t (talk) 16:00, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Bushmaster Firearms InternationalEdit

Talk:Bushmaster_Firearms_International Plese see my response. --Zeamays (talk) 22:10, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution discussionEdit


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is "Bushmaster Firearms International".

Guide for participants

If you wish to open a DR/N filing, click the "Request dispute resolution" button below this guide or go to Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/request for an easy to follow, step by step request form.

What this noticeboard is:
  • It is an early step to resolve content disputes after talk page discussions have stalled. If it's something we can't help you with, or is too complex to resolve here, our volunteers will point you in the right direction.
What this noticeboard is not:
  • It is not a place to deal with the behavior of other editors. We deal with disputes about article content, not disputes about user conduct.
  • It is not a place to discuss disputes that are already under discussion at other dispute resolution forums.
  • It is not a substitute for the talk pages: the dispute must have been discussed extensively on a talk page (not just through edit summaries) before resorting to DRN.
  • It is not a court with judges or arbitrators that issue binding decisions: we focus on resolving disputes through consensus, compromise, and explanation of policy.
Things to remember:
  • Discussions should be civil, calm, concise, neutral, and objective. Comment only about the article's content, not the other editors. Participants who go off-topic or become uncivil may be asked to leave the discussion.
  • Let the other editors know about the discussion by posting {{subst:drn-notice}} on their user talk page.
  • Sign and date your posts with four tildes "~~~~".
  • If you ever need any help, ask one of our volunteers, who will help you as best as they can. You may also wish to read through the FAQ page located here and on the DR/N talkpage.

Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you! ROG5728 (talk) 05:15, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello, from a DR/N volunteerEdit

Olive branch drawing.svg

This is a friendly reminder to involved parties that there is a current Dispute Resolution Noticeboard case still awaiting opening comments from participants. If this dispute has been resolved to the satisfaction of the filing editor and all involved parties, please take a moment to add a note about this at the discussion so that a volunteer may close the case as "Resolved". If the dispute is still ongoing, please add your input.--Amadscientist (talk) 07:19, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!Edit

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!Edit

Scale of justice 2.svgHello, L0b0t. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removedEdit

Hello L0b0t! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MusikBot II talk 20:19, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "L0b0t".