Last edited by Alfietalk⟩ on 8 06 2021
1.37.0-wmf.9 (cdeef1c)

March 2021Edit

Drmies and Blablubbs why I have been blocked? I had already accepted EditorThanos is my account and I didn't used that after the previous SPI. –Hulgedtalk⟩ 14:55, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

  • And Wahhid is yours, which was used on 9 February at a time when you were also using this account, and then there's Ulluly. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wahhid. I do not understand what purpose that mess served, by the way. Drmies (talk) 15:08, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Drmies, I had already confirmed that Wahhid and EditorThanos is me. Kammill and Kamilalibhat we're my former usernames not my accounts. I don't know anything about ulluly and Hornbill, they aren't me. –Hulgedtalk⟩ 15:19, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
"were my former usernames not my accounts" doesn't make any sense: your user name IS your account. And Ulluly and you are a perfect technical match, so that's a problem. Same with TheHornbill, whom I forgot to block with all these complications. CU, if you are responding to this unblock request, you'll see Hulged=Ulluly, and Wahhid = TheHornbill = Hulged. Drmies (talk) 16:14, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hulged (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I don't know why Ulluly and Hornbill are said that they are me, but I haven't used Wahhid and EditorThanos since previous SPI. Please unblock me.

Decline reason:

Ok, so what about User:Ollipinno, who is editing on the same IP as you, 3 minutes before you are? --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 19:31, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Nobody would undo a checkuser block, this is not possible.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:11, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Ymblanter, but why? –Hulgedtalk⟩ 16:17, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Ymblanter, does this mean that I will never be unblocked! –Hulgedtalk⟩ 16:18, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Most likely, you will indeed never be unblocked, but in any case only a checkuser can unblock you. Non-checkusers do not have tools to verify these conclusions.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:31, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Please see WP:OFFER. Drmies (talk) 16:48, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Drmies, thank you for pointing out, but I don't want to wait too much to edit. Please unblock me. I had already disclosed those accounts. Blablubbs, on Jazz's talk page, I wasn't talking about you. They were my tutor and I ask them questions regularly. I came to know about SPI when I was blocked! –Hulgedtalk⟩ 17:09, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Drmies and Jpgordon, then how can I get out of this. Is there any option for me to do. Yes, Ollipinno is mine :( –Hulgedtalk⟩ 03:54, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Your absolutely only choice is WP:OFFER. With this sequence of deception and bad behavior, you might not even be unblocked in six months, but it is your only viable option. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 04:11, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Jpgordon, please say clearly what do you mean. You want me to come back after 6 months and appeal unblock (without using any other account for this period of time). Right? –Hulgedtalk⟩ 04:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Jpgordon, what is 2nd chance here. –Hulgedtalk⟩ 04:26, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
A set of steps you can take at any time to attempt to gain back the trust of the community. The community will not consider it in this case until six months has elapsed. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 04:32, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Jpgordon, thanks for your help! I'll be back after 6 months with the hope that WP:OFFER will help.
You will receive a mail shortly. –Hulgedtalk⟩ 04:36, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Please don't. Follow the steps, and in six months make another unblock request. I won't attend to it; someone else will. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 04:47, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Jpgordon, I didn't appealed my block in the mail. It is my explanation of the whole scenario. –Hulgedtalk⟩ 05:12, 31 March 2021 (UTC)


Rosguill, I'm much ashamed to inform you that I have been blocked for the above reasons. I saw you graded my answers at our NPP school page. I have been said to appeal my unblock 6 months later. :() –Hulgedtalk⟩ 17:47, 31 March 2021 (UTC)


 
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hulged (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please give me only one chance. It will not take much to block me if I did anything wrong again. I will never abuse again. I'm much ashamed of my deception. I don't know how I will talk to Larry (if I'm unblocked) because I had broken the promise I made with him. I believe Drmies, Blablubbs and Jpgordon are right and I accept that all this was done by me. I think this block is not necessary now because I have understood what I was blocked for. I find I can't manage to go without wiki. It has been 4 days (probably 5) since I was blocked. I assure you that I will never ever do the same thing again. Further I confirm that EditorThanos, Ulluly, Wahhid were mine accounts. Please help! Unblock me

Decline reason:

You've worked hard to demonstrate you should not be trusted. Nothing in this unblock request convinces me otherwise. I suggest not trying again befoer 2021-10-03. Yamla (talk) 20:19, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Yamla, sorry, but I think I am being punished. I have understood what I was blocked for and I have already asked your goodself to let me prove myself. I was a productive editor and I would like to continue my journey as all of you are doing. Trust me! I will never deceive again! –Hulgedtalk⟩ 03:50, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Yamla, please one more chance. –Hulgedtalk⟩ 07:50, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
I ensure you that I will never deceive again. Please help me get through this. –Hulgedtalk⟩ 08:36, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
I think you are entirely unsuited to being unblocked at this time. You worked hard to destroy the community's trust in you. I suggest you wait six months and apply, no sooner than 2021-10-06, under the terms of WP:SO. At that point, you will need to work hard to demonstrate you can be trusted again. Don't ping me further. --Yamla (talk) 09:57, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

A message to fellow WikipediansEdit

I'm blocked nowadays, but this doesn't mean that I won't come back. I will certainly appeal my unblock after a period of 6 months. I'm much ashamed of what I have done. I promise that I will never use multiple accounts again. I'll be here checking what's happening around. So, please don't consider I've gone. To make it clear, let me tell you the names of the accounts I owned:

Till 2021-10-7, I will never create any account, I promise. –Hulged†^|k⟩ 11:01, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for that confession. Well done! See you in six months time. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 14:43, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 15, 2021)Edit

 

Thai comics are comics written and produced in Thailand.

Hello, Hulged. The article for improvement of the week is:

Thai comics

Please be bold and help improve it!


Previous selections: Recreation room • Mixed climbing


Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 12 April 2021 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions

TheWikiWizard-April 2021Edit

Hello, Hulged! Here is the April 2021 issue of TheWikiWizard.

Wikipedia NewsEdit

  • MediaWiki has a new logo. Looks great, doesn't it?
  • Did you get to see the April Fools DYK for the Main Page? If not, catch them here (Under April 1)
  • In the Beta Features, try out "Discussion tools" it is a very useful feature for replying to talkpage messages. You will need an account to do so!

MemorialsEdit

  • Pi zero has passed away. Our condolences go out for Pi zero and anyone who knew him. Thank you Pi zero for your service here at Wikimedia. We are very sorry to hear this. We will never forget your valuable contributions to Wikipedia and it's sister projects.

HumourEdit

Tsugaru's Humour Section

  • April Showers can't Bring May Flowers, if the Flowers ran away to June!
  • You can't get in trouble, if you don't cause trouble!
  • The May Flowers can't be flowers if they are roses!

Please find CanadianOtaku's Humour Section below

  • Sadly, there was no edit war of 2021, maybe next year.
  • This joke space is up for rent!
  • You too can be a hacker by removing everything in an article!
  • Error 410: I dropped this joke and I can't find it.

Editor's NotesEdit

  • Just a reminder that TWW is delivered between the 16th to the 20th of each month


Like this Issue? Got Feedback? Spot a mistake? Discuss this issue here

To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here. Enjoy this Issue and stay safe! --つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 23:53, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

This Issue was delivered to you by --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 16, 2021)Edit

 

A street performer in New York wearing a do-rag

Hello, Hulged. The article for improvement of the week is:

Do-rag

Please be bold and help improve it!


Previous selections: Thai comics • Recreation room


Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 19 April 2021 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions

Tech News: 2021-16Edit

16:47, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2021Edit

This week's article for improvement (week 17, 2021)Edit

Hello, Hulged. The article for improvement of the week is:

Huizhou

Please be bold and help improve it!


Previous selections: Do-rag • Thai comics


Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 03:05, 26 April 2021 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions

The Signpost: 25 April 2021Edit

Tech News: 2021-17Edit

21:23, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 18, 2021)Edit

 

Watches are one type of fashion accessory.

Hello, Hulged. The article for improvement of the week is:

Fashion accessory

Please be bold and help improve it!


Previous selections: Huizhou • Do-rag


Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 3 May 2021 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions

Tech News: 2021-18Edit

15:42, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Unblock requestEdit

Oshwah, Mz7 or any other CheckUser can you please review my unblock request with whatever action you feel appropriate. I wouldn't have pinged you but this block appeal was made 8 days ago and I didn't received any response from the CU's. Thanks, Hulged (talk) 07:20, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

By my count, you are banned by the community per WP:3X – Editors who are confirmed by a CheckUser to have engaged in sockpuppetry on at least two occasions after an initial indefinite block that is active, for any reason, are effectively site banned by the Wikipedia community. Indefs: [15][16][17][18], evasion one [19], evasion two [20]. --Blablubbs|talk 11:39, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Blablubbs, I wasn't really aware of WP:3X when I evaded the block using those accounts. But now I am. What should I do now? Hulged (talk) 12:52, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Your awareness of the rules doesn't really play into this especially since you did know that block evasion was illegitimate. You can ask the reviewing administrator to copy your appeal to WP:AN. --Blablubbs|talk 12:55, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Blablubbs, no administrator has responded yet. Should I wait or ask any admin directly. Hulged (talk) 13:08, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Can anyone take my unblock request to the WP:AN? Hulged (talk) 17:09, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

You're going to run into a brick wall there. You were told, "I suggest not trying until 2021-10-03"; you said, "I will certainly appeal my unblock after a period of 6 months". That was exactly two months ago. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 17:17, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Okay! I have hidden my block appeal now. Hulged (talk) 02:11, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
(talk page watcher) Honestly, at this point you should be waiting in excess of a year before you even _consider_ appealing your WP:3X community ban - the only users I've seen successfully come back from a 3X CBAN early in their careers waited multiple years to appeal. -- a they/them | argue | contribs 11:08, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Alfie, thanks for dropping by. It is really hard for me to see myself banned from wikipedia. I didn't knew anything about WP:3X, but still it (possibly) applies because I knew that evading block is illegitimate, as said by Blablubbs above. I will try to be honest and I will appeal after some time. Let's hope I can bear all this. Hulged (talk) 14:14, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
3X applies whether you were aware of it or not. It is a policy designed to protect the community from repeated block evasion, and it works well. I'm going to be really blunt, here, because I've seen a number of editors stand in your shoes - feeling sorry for yourself ("It is really hard for me to see myself banned" / "Let's hope I can bear all this.") is not going to garner any sympathy, nor are non-committal statements ("I will try to be honest / I will appeal after some time", emphasis mine) going to convince an unblocking administrator that your unblock request is worth their time. You're not going to "try" to do better - you're either going to do better, or you're going to remain blocked. You are responsible for your own actions, and until your actions convince an admin that you are aware of this, you will remain blocked. -- a they/them | argue | contribs 15:17, 8 June 2021 (UTC)