Your submission at Articles for creation: K342E6 (September 1)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 15:27, 1 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, K342E6! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:27, 1 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: User:K342E6 has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:K342E6. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:28, 1 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:K342E6

edit
 

A tag has been placed on User:K342E6 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:28, 1 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Ryle Ibanez has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ryle Ibanez. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:31, 1 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ryle Ibanez (September 1)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 15:32, 1 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of Draft:Ryle Ibanez

edit

  Draft:Ryle Ibanez, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Ryle Ibanez and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Ryle Ibanez during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:34, 1 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ryle ibanez (September 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 07:05, 9 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

September 2018

edit