Jellysandwich0

FYI

Line 92, changing "largest city in China's western interior", to "largest city in western China" (link is my addition) is a change in meaning and incorrect. Please be more cautious when copy-editing for geography. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 19:24, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

December 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Loud Luxury. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. See WP:BRD and don't restore your content again. We maintain a maximum of 10 columns on discographies. Ss112 22:38, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

I'm sorry that you seem to be unaware of how Wikipedia works. Your edits were disruptive because you restored content after being reverted and disregarded WP:BRD. That can be seen as unconstructive because you're not following the accepted practice of bold, revert, discuss (that means the editor wanting the change should seek consensus for their changes on the article talk page after they are disagreed with, not the reverting editor's talk page). So I will continue to characterise your edits in that manner if that's the way you want to carry on, thanks very much. I am "insisting" on a maximum of 10 columns because that's the way the article was before you edited it and you're insisting on adding more, which squashes the text to the point of illegibility and widens the page beyond its ordinary limit for some—that's why there's a recommendation and a widely observed standard for 10 columns. You are disregarding that standard (probably because of ignorance in regards to discography article/section conventions) and writing it off as a "recommendation" because you want to include more. Well, open a discussion at Talk:Loud Luxury instead of complaining at me for reverting you. Also, stop opening new discussions on my talk page. How have you been on Wikipedia for years and you still don't understand to reply on your own talk page when somebody opens a discussion there, and to sign your own messages? If you post at my talk page again, you'll be reverted for not following accepted practice. Go to the article talk page instead of bothering me again. Thanks. Ss112 02:52, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Sorry to intrude, but I caught the tail end of the discussion on IRC and was interested in finding the answer. One place to find the limit of 10 columns is at {{Singles discography/doc}} where it's described as a "current maximum". The fact that the Loud Luxury page is building the table without the benefit of the corresponding template is not license to exceed the limit. The other page you were referring to where the 10-column limit is a "suggested limit" is a dormant proposal, so does not carry much policy weight. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:01, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the constructive, supportive contribution, jmcgnh.john 05:43, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Spelling in links

Hello, I don't know if you're using a program or what, but fixing spelling in the mainspace of Wikipedia is a good and useful contribution, but do not "fix" the spelling of outbound links, such as those used in references, without first considering whether the wrong spelling is the correct link, as you did at Hart Island (Bronx), which was "fixed" to a file not found page from this "broken" actual City Record PDF. JesseRafe (talk) 17:37, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Thank you

Hello Jellysandwich0,

thank you for your spelling and style corrections at Unimog 406. Best regards, --Johannes Maximilian (talk) 17:44, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Hey, I really want people to know the whole story of RadhaKrishn. And that is why I had written everything in detail. I know I ain't professional but we can discuss and write. Best regards.

Hamshini K (talk) 14:23, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Minor Barnstar
		For fixing all those minor tpyos and spelling errors in various articles, I hereby award you the Minor Barnstar. Mjroots (talk) 22:09, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

December 2018

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! JesseRafe (talk) 14:14, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Just a token of appreciation for your contributions to Wikipedia. Masum Reza📞 16:38, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Poor English

Hi. First, I would like to say thank you for you corrections on Zenica article. I just got irritated by your edit summary "poor English" which you repeated twice. You don't have to depreciate one's contribs that way and I don't think it is poor English but only have some CE mistakes I missed (like not having the, a or missing one double letter); I am not a native English speaker but I gave all my efforts to have correct grammar when edit got published (I read article twice before publishing it, correcting some spelling and grammar errors, and there was plenty of them in the first version). If there are more spelling or grammar mistakes, I am calling you really to correct them, I don't get bothered by others peddling/pottering or how you say my work but get bothered by direct unduly insults however. --Obsuser (talk) 13:59, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

You are welcome

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:32, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Vaporizer (inhalation device). While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Tamravidhir (talk) 18:55, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

I corrected typos. The promotional material had already been added by another writer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jellysandwich0 (talk • contribs)

Hi, I just checked. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. A glitch seemed to show that the same input was by you while actually it was made by someone else. Deeply regret the inconvenience caused to you. I have striked out the message before. Sorry once again. --Tamravidhir (talk) 19:22, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

A Dobos torte for you!

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:39, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

Here is a brownie for you! Have a good day! Cheers! CentralTime301 12:49, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Curious Me

Hey, I was just passing by & noticed some of your copy edit works & clocked that you didn’t create a userpage for yourself all this years. Any real reason for that or is it just arbitrary? Celestina007 (talk) 21:29, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Asking reply for his statement " poor english

Hey, did u have any sense. If my english is poor you have to point out where i made a mistake .but u simlply wrote poor english. I think you are from other country rather than india. You cannot understand about this contentent caste so, pls consider my reply and tell me where the english of mine is poor. Thank you Sathyanarayana naidu (talk) 03:21, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Sorry forgive me

Iam extremely sorry sir you are genious please forgive my mistakes i will correct it soon thank you thank you sir . Sathyanarayana naidu (talk) 06:50, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

How to Protect Wiki Page

Sir, I want your advice for how to protect the wiki page which i edited. Please ,please ,please, please, please, please, Guide me. Sathyanarayana naidu (talk) 07:15, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Spelling

Thanks, and sorry! - Cannot believe I confused myself! --81.137.62.113 (talk) 21:55, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

February 2020

Hello, I'm Dey subrata. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Gargi College molestations in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.

I want to thank for your effort at the article but I also want to give a soft warning about what you mention in your edit summaries. I have gone through your talk page, there are several cases when you have used "poor" and "awkward" english. Please refrain from such edit summaries, as is one of WP:SUMMARYNO and better mention "copyediting". Mind that wikipedia is not only for people of native English speaker, the changes that you make in various articles are also from countries where English is not the first language. I hope and wish that from now on you will change your behaviour in edit summaries. Dey subrata (talk) 05:17, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Gargi College molestations; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

Your edits do not seem appealing to me, first you have removed an important link without explanation and added the tags which are removed as the article does not need any more. The article in its present status does not need that tag and again the article is about current issue, better to add tag in future if needed. And please refrain from edit war, as it has been reverted twice. 1 and 2. Dey subrata (talk) 04:36, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Typos

Don't remove words because they have been misspelt, correct them instead or leave it, thanks. This is far from constructive [1] --HistoryofIran (talk) 12:48, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Rude buggery

When last I looked (quite recently thanks to you) there were over 38,000,000 registered contributors to “English”-language Wikipedia, mostly from the US and the UK. “Over 30,000 ” contribute more than 5 edits per month which is slightly below one in a thousand. It a vanishingly small and dismal proportion. Wikipedia is an unfinished project created by volunteers. Over the next few months, that high-profile virus is likely to bring an increase in the numbers of new volunteers. Despite eye-watering ambitions claimed for it at launch there is still much to be done both in terms of scope and in terms of quality. You contribute to addressing that which is great. But.

I have no objection to your correcting my typoes before I get to do it for myself. That’s helpful. Almost every wikipedia entry is a work in progress and some progress is self-evidently more urgent (if not necessarily more important) than ... the other stuff

I am more conflicted over your syntax modifications. Some of them look to me like useful improvements. Some of them look significantly worse than what went before. And some of them – most of them – look to me like changes that do no significant damage, but which bring no significant improvement. And I freely accept that this is one of those cases where “two opinions are (or should be) better than one”. Something I do appreciate is that by and large you appear to have taken trouble to familiarise yourself with the context sufficiently ‘’not’’ to introduce significant distortions to the meaning. Not all our wiki-comrades manage that. (Or maybe they simply don’t have the time and / or whatever else it takes.) And although you don’t wait till I’ve finished, you do (usually) manage your timing so as to avoid actual edit conflicts, which waste everyone's time. I appreciate that too.

Most of the (very small proportion of) people who contribute usefully to Wikipedia tend to disappear without trace over time. Maybe they get a day job. Maybe they die. Maybe the two were not mutually exclusive. But when people do take the trouble to explain why they gave up on Wikipedia, they far too frequently cite the aggressiveness and / or rudeness and / or a breath-taking absence of empathy on the part of fellow contributors. It’s a pity, to put it mildly. And a terrible terrible waste.

I do not know how your edits and your summaries summaries look to you. To me they too often look gratuitously rude. They look as though you want me to know that you are one hell of a smart guy or gal and that everyone else is very stupid. If it's true, then you really should try and be smart enough to work on your self-knowledge a bit more. Having taken time (?wasted time) to look at your edit record, I find I am not the first to have come to this conclusion. Frankly, it all tells me more about you than I (or you) should wish for me to know or believe. If you have anger or aggression to offload – and most of us do – please could you do it somewhere else? I freely admit that here I am asking you to “do as I say (write) and not as I (necessarily always) do”. You’re clearly intelligent and competent to write decent English. And you have time for Wikipedia. That’s a depressingly rare combination. Maybe you could spend a little more of your valuable wiki-time (absolutely NO irony intended) on creating new entries and a little less time pissing off the folks who already do that. I refer to the hectoring style of the approach and narratives that too often accompany your contributions. Don’t give up on “improving” other folks’ contributions if that's what you like to do. But maybe a little more balance and a little more empathy might be called for here?

Under that aggression you may well be a sensitive flower like the rest of us. Please try and strip out any feelings of anger or resentment that I raise up from the surface layers of your inner your soul by my sharing my reactions here. I don’t ask you to agree with everything I write. (I’d most likely be amazed and appalled if you did: probably next week I’ll see stuff a bit differently myself.) But please think on it. And thank you.

Success Charles01 (talk) 16:40, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

You inserted a melodramatic as well as quite long message on my talk page. Mentioned were "Maybe they get a day job. Maybe they die. Maybe the two were not mutually exclusive.", "aggressiveness", "rudeness", "a breathtaking absence of empathy", "gratuitously rude", "work on your self-knowledge", "pissing off folks", "hectoring style of the approach and narratives", and "feelings of anger or resentment that I raise up from the surface layers of your inner your (sic) soul". Please reflect on this.

At Wikipedia a certain level of quality is expected in contributions, corrections are made when this is absent, and explanations of edits are made and expected.jellysandwich0 17:24, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

You can make the case that some of what I wrote to you earlier today was rude. If you think that is the case, then I have succeeded in communicating something of value to you. Thank you. But be assured that I intend you no gratuitous discourtesy. And I apologise if or where you nevertheless choose to infer just that.

Also, you deserve a serious reply to your criticisms of my contributions:

I live in England where the infrastructure is pretty basic. When I upload an edit to wikipedia the internet frequently cuts out. Sometimes I lose stuff, though over the years I am getting better at avoiding that. Neverthelss (sic), I have returned to tha (sic) habit I originally acuired (sic) for equivalent reasons with my first Apple Mac bnack (sic) in the 1980s. Save often, so that if the thing screws up you don't lose too much work.

So although I do indeed check my contributions very carefully in the preview window before uploading stuff, sometimes I am called away or otherwise rush off Sometimes I simply fail to notice things. I am, as it happens, more interested in meaning and word order than in the simple spelling errors that can be picked up all together after a couple of days.

You have different priorities. That's fine. Your (sic) right. You may have a reliable internet connection. You are to be envied.

I still think you need to work on your empathy.

Did that help? Hope so.

Best wishes Charles01 (talk) 17:56, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for fixing my spelling and bad grammar on my update on the Les Miserables article. :) Andrzejbanas (talk) 03:43, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Lab Rats (American TV series), you may be blocked from editing. Amaury • 16:03, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Lab Rats (American TV series); that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury • 16:03, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

I am sorry for the repetition of the correction. Please notice that you are using three words to say what one suffices to. I believe you have worsened the style of the writing. Take another look at it and you just might agree.jellysandwich0 16:13, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

IP 183.83.72.166

It is B.Bhargava Teja evading block. He is still as disruptive, replacing the good {{trans}} template with the absurd English: Translation and adding indic scripts in violation of WP:INDICSCRIPT. While copyediting his articles, can you please replace English: Translation with {{trans}} (itself a redirect to {{translation}})? --Kailash29792 (talk) 08:48, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

A large number of

Hi, you seem to be making a lot of edits replacing the phrase "a large number of" with "many". Yeah, this is sometimes an improvement, but at least occasionally the other one will be better, and I don't see why they should be changed like that across the board. What is it that I'm missing? – Uanfala (talk) 12:57, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

It is not my intent to switch to "many" every in every instance. But the longer version is often needlessly used. Extra words without extra meaning are a flaw. If you feel the previous way was better, restore it. An explanation in the edit summary will help me fine-tune my approach. Thank you for the feedback.jellysandwich0 13:15, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

I apologise for changing the phrasing in "Zemiaki language" twice. This was due to not knowing the edit had been reverted.jellysandwich0 13:36, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

No problem, this happens. Generally, there might be a variety of reasons why the longer phrase might have been chosen in each instance. I suspect the choice will often have to do with rhythm (sounds better when read out loud). In some cases I would use "a large number of" because it seems to foreground that piece of information, and – on account of its sheer length – it confers a somewhat greater salience to it. – Uanfala (talk) 13:51, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

In the past, some of my edits were reverted in articles regarding mathematics and statistics. Surprisingly, there is a small but relevant difference in meaning between "many" and "a large number of", making only one appropriate. I agree that in certain sentences one sounds better than the other, a real curiosity. Perhaps a linguist would say that language is not completely governed by logic.jellysandwich0 14:08, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Signatures

Hi. I noticed, in a recent post at the Help Desk, your signature does not contain a link to your user or talk pages, as requested at Wikipedia:Signatures#Guidelines and policies. This makes it inconvenient for people to see your contribs, navigate to your talk page, etc. You can reset your signature to the default by blanking out the Signature field at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-personal and unchecking the "Treat the above as wiki markup" checkbox. Thanks. —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 07:43, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Stay safe, EditQwerty (talk) 20:54, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

July 2020

Hello, I'm Tyw7. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Tire tread have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 08:43, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Judge Rotenberg Educational Center

Thanks for your help on Judge Rotenberg Educational Center. Your edits are much appreciated! --66.244.121.212 (talk) 19:49, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Thank you for your contributions to the Klagenfurt article and many others! gidonb (talk) 14:05, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Please stop changing quotes

Please stop editing quotes to change the wording, like you did here. Quotes are quotes, you can't change them just because you don't like what the author wrote. - Ahunt (talk) 14:07, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Sorry! I did not see the quotation marks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jellysandwich0 (talk • contribs) 14:09, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Request

Hello Sir i think u made some edits on Rana sanga wikipedia page but are reverted by User named as Alivardi even though are reviewed by Senior administraitor as i see the sources are scholary please revert those Paras in his page as it gives more detail about him.Regards The String 20 (talk) 13:58, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

== Request 2.0 ==

After defeating some sultans of Hindustan, thatincluding includesthe Sultans of Delhi, Malwa and Gujarat,Sanga succesfullySanga established soveregintysovereignty of Mewar Overover Rajasthan and also established his supermacysupremacy over Malwa and Gujarat. He united several Rajput states to Fightfight Babur and re-establish a Hindu power in Delhi.. Rajput Strength under Sanga reached its Zenith and start to threateans whole Muslim Position in Northern India.However he was defeated by Babur at Battle of khanwa.His Defeat at khanwa marks a turning point in Medieval India's History as it shifts the Sovereginty of The country from Rajput to mughals. Sir i was talking to re add this part in main lead as it important please re add it.RegardsThe String 20 (talk) 14:37, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

I will not add this edit. There are errors in spelling. Words that should be capitalised are not and words that should not be capitalised are. There should be space between words and between sentences, but there often is not. Please make more of an effort to correctly write in English.Jellysandwich0 (talk) 15:18, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

References

Contacted by sockpuppet

Hi, I just wanted to let you know that the account that recently contacted you, The String 20, is a confirmed sockpuppet of User:Showbiz826, who had been blocked for edit warring and block evasion. Due to various page protections and IP blocks, Showbiz826 is unable to make edits themselves on many articles. Instead, they have made several sockpuppets which they use to try to pester other users into implementing their desired edits (see Caliphates 727, Dk Lillee 1949 and Ennis1849 among others). It is therefore likely that they will contact you again in the guise of a new account. I'll leave it up to you how you decide to deal with this, though I personally believe it is best to just ignore such messages. I hope you find this message useful.
Alivardi (talk) 18:07, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you!Jellysandwich0 (talk) 22:42, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Yeh Rishtey Hain Pyaar Ke

Your recent revertion [2] removing my edits stating that it is a plot. But what i added was a cast description. So can i know what made you remove it? Thanks Noobie anonymous (talk) 07:11, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

The cast descriptions are to state who the actors and actresses portray, not what the characters do and what happens to them. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 19:09, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Reverts in Taro

Hi, I just thought I'd inform you that I had to revert your edits in Taro. It seems you were trying in good faith to phrase things better, but you replaced correct grammar with incorrect one. —I'llbeyourbeach (talk) 09:26, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Kiga people

Sorry Jellysandwich0 - I got myself confused at Kiga people and made a right mess - hopefully I've sorted it out - apologies again - Arjayay (talk) 16:16, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Zvi Bodie edits

Just a quick thanks for your edits to the information that I added to Zvi Bodie. I intended to add quotation marks around the list that you reworked, oops! =-O Mollifiednow (talk) 01:42, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

"Lots of"

Hi JSO, can you please point me to the Wikipedia guidance that deprecates the phrase "lots of"? Bermicourt (talk) 07:50, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

I replace it with many or much if they sound better. Why use two words when one suffices? Jellysandwich0 (talk) 14:17, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

That's fine, but it's basically subjective. And two words may sound better or more natural or just add more information; it depends entirely on the context. Why change words that are perfectly acceptable? Bermicourt (talk) 15:35, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

"Lots of" only sometimes sounds better and rarely if ever conveys more information. The single word often sounds better and if they are equivalent, why use two words instead of one? Jellysandwich0 (talk) 15:45, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

That is sometimes true, but not always, so we shouldn't be mass changing words based on what is essentially a personal opinion. Bermicourt (talk) 08:11, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

This is to warn you that this kind of editing without even an edit summary cannot be tolerated. Wikipedia works by rules and you continue to defiantly break them. It's probably time to suggest to administrators that your behavior is verging on WP:VANDALISM. Sweetpool50 (talk) 02:28, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

I can write summaries. What "rules" do you believe I am "defiantly" breaking? I believe that my edits are constructive and improve articles and do not consider them to be vandalism and am unaware of any rules being broken. Please explain to me why you feel this is vandalism (as well as inform me of these "rules"). Jellysandwich0 (talk) 02:45, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

WP:FIES. Persisting in not giving a valid summary as you have been doing counts as disruption. Pretending not to understand as you have been doing above counts as WP:WIKILAWYERING and is a sure sign of a vandal. Sweetpool50 (talk) 03:15, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

I am not pretending. We have already addressed the issue of summaries, so stop wallowing in the issue. Again, please let me know which "rules" you are writing about. And, again, please identify which edit or edits "is verging on vandalism". I have addressed your concerns, so please be constructive and answer my questions. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 03:33, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

The issue here is that you are persisting in making edits that are not based on Wikipedia guidelines but simply on your own WP:POV of what "sounds" like good English, despite the fact that it is clearly tendentious because other editors have challenged you. That is WP:DISRUPTIVE editing and I would ask you therefore to revert your edits except where you can achieve consensus on an individual article; otherwise you risk a ban. Bermicourt (talk) 08:57, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Your impression that you are improving articles is false. It's clear to me, as someone with a university degree in English and long experience of editing outside WP, that some of your edits have changed the meaning of what was originally written and therefore required WP:consensus. As said above, you have launched a campaign of POV edits which disrupts the encyclopedia. If you really want to be confronted by an administrator, we'll oblige you. Sweetpool50 (talk) 17:31, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Don't Remove Relevant Content

Hello I recently saw u Removing Many parts of Serial May I Come In Madam kindly dont do that again as u have done of removing everything like u done in Sequel series case and Reception Is a newly created page by me and need more citations which i am adding from Good sources.If u found Something Gramatical incorrect please corect that without removing or Inform me on My Talk Page i will definately solve the issue as Page is created by myself. Now hope u get my point it Took time to find good sources on new page and removing them isnt fine.Hope u get dear i re add part in better language now dont remove i am asking a Administraitor to review who will do that Thanks and Cheers. Aristocratic 536 (talk) 01:52, 27 October 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aristocratic 536 (talk • contribs)

I signed my comment now i forgot Chill out. Aristocratic 536 (talk) 01:53, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Much of the writing in the article was of very poor quality. There were many errors in the grammar, spelling, capitalisation, punctuation, and spacing. That writing does not belong in Wikipedia. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 02:09, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Yes you are right Although i improved the language Now and please dont remove content now i already talk to A user who will check it and currently article is on a trial.Grammar errors can be fix easily but removing Good Citations wont going to do any good for article future. Thanks for concern but in future dont remove content on that page u can improve language if u want although its unneccsary now,thanks. Have a good day mate.Aristocratic 536 (talk) 05:09, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Reverting rather than editing

Hi there,

I wanted to thank you for helping to keep the Otacon article under control recently with the user who insists on repeated vandalisation. However, I'd like to ask a favour in that when changing the article (or others like it) back, you use the undo function to revert the article where possible rather than editing it. A few times a number of details have been left unreverted and needing extra changes by editing back and simply undoing the edits outright would prevent this.

Thanks again for your help in monitoring the article.

You are welcome. I will do my best to remember. Is it possible to limit editing privileges on that article to a certain level of editors? Jellysandwich0 (talk) 17:00, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

May I Come In Madam

Hello I recently added more details about diff characters of May I Come In Madam but again u revert all of them without asking me even Once Fact is there is indeed need of elaborated sections in Characters of Hindi TV shows it gives more details about Serial theme I am re adding the part kindly dont remove now,Its a request,If u found gramatical error kindly try to correct not remove. Cheers. Aristocratic 536 (talk) 17:10, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

You can see Bhabhi Ji Ghar Par Hai serial and many others wiki of serials even their Characters are elaborated it didnt need to be brief Its not summary Morever i wrote as less as i can and give more idea about track of serial dont revert now 😊😊😊. Aristocratic 536 (talk) 17:28, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

The edits had very many errors in grammar, capitalisation, punctuation, spelling, spacing, and style. Wikipedia articles are written with at least a standard level of quality. Please write correctly. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 17:31, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Also i Want to Inform u That on Rana Sanga article page the edits were largely from a Blocked User secondly i tried to brief the part of Conquest of Malwa but you re add a lot of chunk of data from blocked user we already provide link to Battle of Gagron Page Kindly read the battle page and try to brief the details on Main page instead adding everything And i readd Characters of May I Come In Madam avoiding bad language kindly dont revert now. Aristocratic 536 (talk) 03:57, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Happy Diwali!

		Happy Diwali!!!
		Sky full of fireworks, Mouth full of sweets, Home full of lamps, And festival full of sweet memories... Wishing You a Very Happy and Prosperous Diwali. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:16, 14 November 2020 (UTC) Send Diwali wishings by adding {{subst:Happy Diwali}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.

Center Axle Disconnect

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Center axle disconnect, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. You don't correct spelling errors in links to website. It causes the link not to work. Thanks.Dana60Cummins (talk) 15:34, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Only the title was changed, so, if you look, the link still "worked" after my edit. I was not aware that there is a policy about that. Thank you for the policy information. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 15:50, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

I clicked the link and it did not work with the spelling correction. Like the warning says, just use the sandbox next time. Dana60Cummins (talk) 22:17, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Specification

Hi, as i saw that, your edits were non reasonable, your edit were most in international broadcast section for promotion, if you things that it was promotion, then you need to remove that from all the TV series. Kboomika33 (talk) 08:03, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello Jellysandwich0, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Happy editing, Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:19, 24 December 2020 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Happy New Year, Jellysandwich0!

Happy New Year!

Jellysandwich0,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:31, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Thank you, a barnstar for you

		The Editor's Barnstar
		For the article Sati (Hindu goddess). Thank you very much for your grammatical corrections. .💠245CMR💠.•👥📜 15:43, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Special Barnstar
		This barnstar is provided to you for your contributions on several articles especially for fixing Grammatical errors. Keep going. Vengeance 01 (talk) 12:22, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

poor English

Thank you. Please continue correcting my edits. English is not my native tongue. I try. I will happily correct your Tamil articles. Just order. Waked Bold Ambushed (talk) 11:38, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Gratitude

Thank you for the suggestion Brendonmotom (talk) 10:32, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Poor English matter

Hi, if someone's english is poor. Please do correct, information are provided by known person who may not be a native Englishman. Brendonmotom (talk) 10:34, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks

Your observation on my writing is very helpful and many thanks for the corrections, it guided me a lot to stay on focus when writing! - Further, may I request, please be polite a little bit - just say improve yout English, it will be more appropriate than saying "poor writing" or "poor English". I appreciate your contributions. Rane2030 (talk) 17:07, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Saath Nibhaana Saathiya 2

I liked what you did with your edit, since the plot shouldn't exceed 500 words, but maybe you could've just shortened the plot by paraphrasing and removing some sentences, instead of removing paragraphs, since they looked very important. We are the Great (talk) 16:55, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Rana Sanga article

Hii, Can you Please take a look at Rana Sanga article and fix some gramatical issues on that page as you seems to have a strong command on these issues.2401:4900:40A3:4B29:25A7:E0C3:1ACE:25BD (talk) 08:25, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

CE typo

Hi. I'm just letting you know that you missed a comma in Special:Diff/1027745379 before Sundeep, thereby changing meaning of the sentence completely. I've corrected it. Could you also verify your last edits to other articles changing the "get married" to "marry" so that you didn't miss anything? -- DaxServer (talk) 19:56, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for fixing my awkard English in several articles. Could you please have a look at Captain Raju, Cochin Haneefa, Harisree Ashokan and Anie Siva. I added plenty of contents in these also. Thank you for your help Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 12:04, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cold Case (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Usha. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:01, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Airlines

Hello, please, when you delete some airline from the list of active airlines, add that airline after that to the list of defunct airlines. Thank you. Peter11700 (talk) 07:49, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Gyaru wiki - regarding Zoomgals

Hello,

I know that my writing in the gyaru Wikipedia article, is either too cluttered when published or has too much information. I am grateful that you are proofreading all of the text that I add to the article, which is poorly written. But the Zoomgals music group in the music section is a necessary part of information for it. Even if it is unintelligible in my writing or explaining, it might also be how you may perceive the actual music itself; either way it is information that is in principal needed to that very section. So, how would you explain it or make this paragraph about this music group understandable since as you've seen already; I am incapable of explain this without becoming it redundant. Thank you.

Gyaru wiki - Zoomgals part II

Hello again,

I just want to tell you I'm going to re-add the text but written differently this time. I hope you'll understand it this time or is understandable. If it is still poorly written; I would appreciate a proofreading from you. If it is as you wrote "unintelligible" again, please don't remove it fully again; I just want the text to be understandable. Yet again, thank you for your help.

Have a nice day.

Gyaru Article, the use of semicolons

Hello,

I must thank you, yet again for proofreading the article. I know that my use of semicolons is incorrect, unnecessary and may diminish the Wikipedia article's value. So, I must thank you once more for helping, proofreading and telling me that I should pay attention. Therefore I shall try my best to avoid doing so and learn the correct use of this punctuation. If this were to ever happen again; please just send a message or correct the obvious mistakes I am making due to my poor use of these punctuations. Thank you.

Have a nice day. P.S.: I hope the following is correct; I've used Google translate: शुक्रिया! & सप्ताहांत शुभ रहे।

Pandian Stores revert

Hey, I just did a pretty substantial revert on Pandian Stores [3]. Did some digging, and Mia editz 008 is a really obvious sock of Giriprasad Damodar 02. SPI filed Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Giriprasad_Damodar_02. Their edits are so poorly written and sourced that I'm way past the point of even trying to help them out when they obviously don't care much about Wikipedia. Ravensfire (talk) 20:46, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Anupamaa editing

Hey please don't remove episode counts, plot and characteristics of any character again as they'll increase as the story will progress. And I'm it's regular viewer since starting. So I've seen each and every character growth and story. So please don't remove Pra2310 (talk) 17:08, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Yeh Hai Chahatein editing

Hi got your message on my talk page. Just wanted to clarify it with you, since have noticed you have been cutting off the plot in a way it’s hardly making any sense. However, I understand your point of plot being too long. A group of us regular viewers who watch the show joined Wikipedia to keep the plot updated as the page was extremely dry with no one updating at all. It’s a successful ongoing show, just wanted to keep the page updated. It takes time and effort to keep it updated and will do my best to keep it as short as possible since it’s an ongoing plot. Got your point, but it’s a sincere request to you since you didn’t seem to be a regular viewer of the show, to not keep changing it every three days, this was not a problem before. Will do the best to keep it as short as possible in the next edit, but please understand it’s an ongoing plot. Also new to Wikipedia, so still learning too. Hope you understand, thank you. GrottoVilla (talk) 21:27, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @GrottoVilla please remember that the goal of the plot is to present a short summary of the major plotlines. Daily updates make it very easy for plots to get beyond the MOS:TVPLOT of no more than 500 words per season and that's not good. It's often easier to avoid those quick updates that leads to the gradual plot length creep, and focus only on the really, truly significant plot lines. I assure you, this isn't something new and happens on more than a few articles, it takes some patience and willingness to collaborate to make it work. Ravensfire (talk) 21:50, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Alright got it! Patience and willingness to collaborate is okay! Will work on making it as short as possible- what’s not okay is cutting out the entire plot to only 2-3 lines which has been happening multiple times or cutting out relevant stuff that leaves the plot not making sense. This has been happening only recently by her/him. Regular viewers are updating the page which was once dry, so to please stop reverting their edits which take time and effort to do so, that is all. GrottoVilla (talk) 14:58, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

@GrottoVilla that can happen when someone adds an extremely large plot section - [4]. It's frustrating for the person adding it, but also look at it from the perspective of an editor trying to steward an article and keep it at least somewhat in line with Wikipedia's WP:MOS:manual of style. Look at the plot right now for Yeh Hai Chahatein - it's over 4,000 words, not the ~500 max it should be. (as of this version, I have reverted to the prior version which is still 2400 words) That's not good. Ravensfire (talk) 18:24, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Please stop reverting the yeh hai chahatein edits

Hi you need to stop reverting the edits on the yeh hai chahatein page. Your point about the plot length being too long was understood. So a different section for list of episodes was made which the rules allow, yet you still reverted the edit. Please do not do that again. I can see from your discussion page that you do this a lot on other pages despite people requesting you not to do so. Please respect the time and effort others take so such edits. GrottoVilla (talk) 18:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Shortening Gyaru Wiki article

Could you please help me with the subject of shortening it. I just recently added the Wiki transl template to the article, that is why it has gotten larger. If you could proofread the article or find things that can be elaborated in a shorter manner; I'll be whole heartedly grateful. Thank you for the warning! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.99.169.177 (talk) 10:40, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for the invitation. I will assist in the near future. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 18:31, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern about Kudumbavilakku

I saw this [5] edit which you made once in Kudumbavilakku. I tagged the article and said that the article has a big plot. Should I revert the tag, and shorten the cast section as you did??? What is your opinion?? This article really has multiple issues, and the cast section also shows excessive relationship with others, so I removed some, but it is hard to remove as I don't know which relationship is important and which is excess. So would you please see the article and help me. Thanks and regards. Itcouldbepossible (talk) 08:06, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for the message. The big-plot tag is a good idea, so please leave it there. Someone should shorten the plot section. But the cast section is acceptable and needs little if any improvement. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 18:21, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, but please ping me from the next time you write something. I am new and that is why I am not so comfortable with the watchlist. It took me so many days to find out what I had written and what you have replied. Thanks and Regards. Itcouldbepossible (talk) 06:29, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Mayakkam Enna

Hi, this is to inform you that the page Mayakkam Enna you have edited has been undone due to it being unconstructive. Please stop making disruptive edits otherwise you will be blocked from editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.177.191.118 (talk) 17:52, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Minor edits

Hi Jellysandwich0! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Ghmyrtle (talk) 20:55, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for this information and the link to the minor edit explanation. I was unaware of this. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 17:00, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

July 2023

Hi Jellysandwich0! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Eternamente amándonos that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 02:04, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Bigg Boss (Tamil season 7)

I've asked for protection Knitsey (talk) 13:42, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! Jellysandwich0 (talk) 13:44, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Excess space

I welcome you proofreading my work on Robert Hooke because I know my inattention to detail that means unclosed parentheses and the like. Please continue to do so as there is quite a bit more to come. But you may not be aware that "the system" closes up excess spaces automagically (as you will see if you look at the source of this sentence). So I fix horrors like full-stop double-space when I see them, but generally don't bother.

FYI only, your call. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 17:07, 11 January 2024 (UTC)